<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; paul lo duca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/tag/paul-lo-duca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To Pudge or not to Pudge</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/09/to-pudge-or-not-to-pudge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/09/to-pudge-or-not-to-pudge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jorge posada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul lo duca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pudge rodriguez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/09/to-pudge-or-not-to-pudge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the Tigers biggest decisions this off season will be whether or not to exercise Pudge Rodriguez&#8217;s $13 million option.&#160; The net cost to the Tigers is $10 million because there is a $3 million buyout.&#160; But be it $10 million or $13 million there is no way that Rodriguez will be &#8220;worth&#8221; what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>One of the Tigers biggest decisions this off season will be whether or not to exercise Pudge Rodriguez&#8217;s $13 million option.&nbsp; The net cost to the Tigers is $10 million because there is a $3 million buyout.&nbsp; But be it $10 million or $13 million there is no way that Rodriguez will be &#8220;worth&#8221; what he is owed.&nbsp; Still I think exercising the option is something the Tigers should do.</p>
<p>Rodriguez has caught over 2000 games, and is in a well expected decline phase of his career.&nbsp; Next year he&#8217;ll be 36 and there&#8217;s no reason to believe things will be better.&nbsp; His slugging percentage has declined each of the last 4 years and the .420 slugging he posted this year was the lowest since 1993.</p>
<p>But his slugging is the acceptable part of his offensive stat line.&nbsp; For the second time in the last 3 years he finished with a sub .300 on base percentage.&nbsp; He&#8217;s drawn a whopping 46 walks the last 3 years combined.</p>
<p>And then there is his defense.&nbsp; Rodriguez is much heralded for his ability to shut down the running game, and it has been largely deserved up until this year.&nbsp; However his caught stealing rate fell to 29% this year which was the lowest of his career.&nbsp; He also had trouble blocking balls as he allowed .510 passed balls and wild pitches to get by him per game.</p>
<p>Okay, so I haven&#8217;t painted a compelling reason to bring him back.&nbsp; But it really comes down to a matter of <i>if not Pudge, then who?&nbsp; </i>The <a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/03/2008_mlb_free_a.html">free agent class</a> includes the likes of <a HREF="http://www.baseball-reference.com/k/kendaja01.shtml">Jason Kendall</a> and <a HREF="http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/barremi01.shtml">Michael Barrett</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Two of the bigger names are <a HREF="http://www.baseball-reference.com/l/loducpa01.shtml">Paul Lo Duca</a> and <a HREF="http://www.baseball-reference.com/p/posadjo01.shtml">Jorge Posada</a>, but both are the same age as Rodriguez which is a dangerous age for a catcher. <br /><i><br /></i>Rodriguez&#8217;s offensive numbers were bad, and I don&#8217;t really look for them to get better.&nbsp; I&#8217;d expect a few more walks and a slightly better OBP next year, but I also expect the slugging to continue to drop.&nbsp; But even with the decline he&#8217;s still better than Lo Duca who had a .690 OPS this year.</p>
<p>As for the defense, Rodriguez was still above average at throwing out baserunners and ranked 5th among all starting catchers.&nbsp; While his kills were down, it was in a year when stolen base percentage reached <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/increasingly-in-baseball-stealing-pays-173/">an all time high</a> of 74.6%.&nbsp; Plus throw in the deterrent that his reputation is and he had the 4th fewest attempts per game against him.&nbsp; And it was still superior to Lo Duca&#8217;s 19% or Posada&#8217;s 22%.</p>
<p>As for the passed balls and wild pitches, he does rank 3rd from the bottom.&nbsp; He does rank ahead of Posada and he&#8217;s 2 spots behind <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5izNO9l-6RKloO4BK5-Zl0yGHxU5g"></a><a HREF="http://www.baseball-reference.com/p/pierza.01.shtml">A.J. Pierzynski</a> who just received a 2 year extension that will pay him $6.25 million in 2009 and 2010.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Out of all the options, Rodriguez&#8217;s might be the most palatable.&nbsp; Upgrading the position is going to be difficult at best and could prove to be impossible.&nbsp; I&#8217;m not going to say that Rodriguez won&#8217;t be overpaid if he comes back, but do you overpay for 1 year of Pudge or 3 to 4 years of another mediocre catcher?</p>
<p>Danny Knobler is saying that the Tigers are <a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2007/09/tigers_unlikely_to_bring_back.html">likely to turn down the option</a> I don&#8217;t know if he is reporting or opining, but his information is usually pretty good.&nbsp; If that&#8217;s the case I&#8217;d hope that the Tigers look to bring back Pudge for not one, but two more years at a discounted per year rate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2007/09/tigers_unlikely_to_bring_back.html">Tigers unlikely to bring back Pudge &#8211; MLive.com: Detroit Tigers</a><br /><a href="http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=catching&amp;linesToDisplay=50&amp;qual_filter=1&amp;season_filter%5B0%5D=2007&amp;league_filter%5B0%5D=All&amp;Submit=Submit&amp;orderBy=inn&amp;direction=DESC&amp;page=1">THT Catching &#8211; Major League Baseball Statistics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/09/to-pudge-or-not-to-pudge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

