<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; edwin jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/tag/edwin-jackson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It doesn&#8217;t add up</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/it-doesnt-add-up-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/it-doesnt-add-up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandy-trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/it-doesnt-add-up-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Curtis Granderson trade hasn’t set well with me from the outset. I’ve taken some time to mull everything over and look at it a number of ways. I think I’ve moved past the emotional component. I’ve taken a look back at the new Tigers and the return is OK. But therein lies the problem. The return was just OK in my view. An OK return isn’t enough to trade a player that didn’t have to be traded. It just doesn’t add up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/it-doesnt-add-up-2/" title="Permanent link to It doesn&rsquo;t add up"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1117095_18716019_thumb.jpg" width="242" height="182" alt="Post image for It doesn&rsquo;t add up" /></a>
</p><p>The <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=4747&amp;position=OF">Curtis Granderson</a> <a href="http://detroittigersweblog.com/tag/grandy-trade">trade</a> hasn’t set well with me from the outset. I’ve taken some time to mull everything over and look at it a number of ways. I think I’ve moved past the emotional component. I’ve taken a look back at the new Tigers and the return is OK. But therein lies the problem. The return was just OK in my view. An OK return isn’t enough to trade a player that didn’t have to be traded. It just doesn’t add up.</p>
<p>I know I’m not alone in this. Other Tigers bloggers who I respect for their <a href="http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/home/2009/12/10/trading-curtis-granderson-i-dont-like-it-one-bit.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+mackavenuetigers+%28Mack+Avenue+Tigers%3A+A+Detroit+Tigers+Blog%29">thoughtful</a> and <a href="http://www.tigersbythenumbers.com/2009/12/time-to-question-dave-dombrowski.html#comment-form">analytic</a> approach are still struggling with it as well. Like them, it is with the chronology of the deal that doesn’t make sense.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/hardball/up_halladay_joba_and_kennedy_v0XQ27RUmcLRpk6hxOpThL">Joel Sherman first reported</a> that the Tigers told the Diamondbacks that <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=3137&amp;position=P">Max Scherzer</a> wasn’t enough for <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">Edwin Jackson</a> which is how <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=8739&amp;position=P">Daniel Schlereth</a> came to be in the deal which is how the Yankees came into the deal.</p>
<p>I understand trying to maximize the trade value for Jackson, but wouldn’t a straight Scherzer for Jackson trade have accomplished the Tigers mission. They would have realized a net savings of $3-$4 million for 2010 while netting an additional 3 years of club control while not taking a step back on the field. Why not make that trade, forego Schlereth and keep Granderson on the team?</p>
<p>Perhaps Dombrowski shares the Diamondbacks concern that Scherzer can’t stay in the rotation because of violent delivery. If that’s the case the trade looks much less appealing right at the outset.</p>
<p>Or maybe the financial situation is much more dire <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/estimating-the-tigers-financial-situation/">than I project it to be</a>? That is certainly a possibility, but the difference between Jackson and Granderson on the payroll in 2010 is $5 million. It isn’t an insignificant number but giving up Granderson doesn’t seem like the best option to save $5 million. <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1698&amp;position=C">Gerald Laird</a> and <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1225&amp;position=P">Bobby Seay</a> will combine to make more than that in 2010. Not to mention the fact that the payroll crunch is over after 2010.</p>
<p>I’m just not buying it.</p>
<p>I understand the Tigers limited resources this year, both in terms of budgets and in attractive assets and that some difficult moves may need to be made. If the Tigers had been bowled over with an offer I would get behind it. That wasn’t the case though. Reports are that the Tigers compromised their demands to let the deal happen. It was almost as if the team HAD to trade Granderson.</p>
<p>What if Dombrowski asked for Scherleth just to force the Yankees into the deal to unload Granderson? The Yankees would probably put together the best package due to the presence of Austin Jackson and the ability for the team to sell it to fans that Jackson could step right in next year.</p>
<p>The question still becomes why? Why would Granderson have to be unloaded and quickly? There has never been even a hint of any sort of character issue and Zach Miner spoke about how<a href="http://beck.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/12/tigers_teammates_react_to_trad.html"> the club would miss his leadershi</a>p. Not to mention the fact the club seems content with Miguel Cabrera’s transgressions the final weekend of the season.</p>
<p>It’s all speculation at this point, but with so little making sense right now that’s what we’re left with.What I do know is that for the first time since the 2002 I’m not looking forward to the coming baseball season with hopeful anticipation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/it-doesnt-add-up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More notes on the trade</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/more-notes-on-the-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/more-notes-on-the-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel schlereth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandy-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max scherzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/more-notes-on-the-trade/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like there will be plenty of news, notes, and opinion on the trade that will come out today - along with a formal announcement and quotes galore. I'll use this post to try and capture some of the more salient information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/more-notes-on-the-trade/" title="Permanent link to More notes on the trade"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/austinjackson_thumb.jpg" width="178" height="240" alt="Post image for More notes on the trade" /></a>
</p><p class="alert"><strong>UPDATE 7:30 PM:</strong> Freddy Dolsi and Dusty Ryan were designated for assignment. I&#8217;m surprised by both moves with other seemingly expendable players on the 40 man roster&#8230;Jason Beck spoke with Gerald Laird and got <a href="http://twitter.com/beckjason/statuses/6513730218">his</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/beckjason/statuses/6513769343">take</a>&#8230;Beck also spoke with Dombrowski and Phil Coke&#8217;s role has <a href="http://twitter.com/beckjason/statuses/6513570628">been left open</a>&#8230;Danny Knobler sees the Tigers as potentially big spenders <a href="http://danny-knobler.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/8590096/18847902?source=rss_blogs_MLB">after this season</a>.</p>
<p>UPDATE: 4:50 PM: The press conference just ended Dave Dombrowski fielded most of the questions. Here are the notes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Dombrowski: team needed to make adjustments. Wanted to get a young starter and a young centerfielder to start. Team is trying to stay competitive and set themselves up for the future.</li>
<li>On Schlereth: He was a player the team considered drafting in 2008. For the Diamondbacks to include him, they were going to need a second arm which brought in the Yankees.</li>
<li>On Austin Jackson: they are counting on Jackson to make the big league club. They have been scouting him for a while. &#8220;Jim Leyland breaks in young players as well as anybody.&#8221;</li>
<li>Cashman on Granderson: After speaking about how hard it was to give up the young players that they did he went on to say he&#8217;s a premiere player and an exceptional character guy. He can step in right away as an established player which was important with potential departure of Damon and Matsui</li>
<li>Dombrowski on trading Granderson and his popularity: It&#8217;s difficult and he told Granderson it was one of the more difficult calls he&#8217;s made in his career. Granderson has meant a lot to the franchise, the city, and the state but it is a business decision. He&#8217;s a unique individual. Hope is that they have acquired more players that the fans will learn to love.</li>
</ul>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE: 4:08 PM</strong>: Now pretty much every writer says its official and the presser comes at 4:30. Also John Lowe has a story on <a href="“It’s a concern that you could be breaking in a couple of young players,” Leyland said. “I love it, but you have to understand they’re not going to just tear it up.” ">Leyland&#8217;s media session</a> this afternoon and his concerns about the youth of the team and the right handedness of the lineup.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 3:35 PM</strong>: Joel Sherman just tweeted that <a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6507705176">the trade is official</a>. Expect press releases and a news conference very shortly.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE: 2:10</strong> It sounds as if Jim Leyland is holding court with some reporters at the moment. Kevin &#8216;Duk Kaduk of Big League Stew (@bigleaguestew) has been tweeting the notes. Leyland is frustrated to be talking about players he used to have and is <a href="http://twitter.com/bigleaguestew/statuses/6505329828">worried his lineup is too right handed</a>. Sounds like a familiar refrain.</p>
<p><span class="drop_cap">I</span>t looks like there will be plenty of news, notes, and opinion on the trade that will come out today &#8211; along with a formal announcement and quotes galore. I&#8217;ll use this post to try and capture some of the more salient information.</p>
<p>As of 11:15 AM what&#8217;s being reported is:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Tigers plan on Austin Jackson being <a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6500276261">the starting centerfielder in 2010</a></li>
<li>The Tigers as of now are <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10491164">planning on</a> Max Scherzer being in the rotation</li>
<li>Joel Sherman <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/hardball/up_halladay_joba_and_kennedy_v0XQ27RUmcLRpk6hxOpThL">has details on how the trade</a> came together. It sounds as if at one point there was a straight Edwin Jackson for Scherzer trade on the table but it wasn&#8217;t enough for the Tigers.</li>
<li>There are whispers about <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/hardball/why_yanks_know_granderson_well_1dw7ip1Bt485N3jwuBH2NK">Granderson having a depth perception issue</a>. I view this as mostly ridiculous but Grandy did talk about having trouble picking up the ball at Comerica Park.</li>
<li>For what it&#8217;s worth Scherzer is a Scott Boras client</li>
<li>Baseball America released their <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2010/269226.html">Top 10 prospect list for the Diamondbacks</a> and Daniel Schlereth ranks 5th.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/more-notes-on-the-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrapping up the trade</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/wrapping-up-the-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/wrapping-up-the-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bobby seay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dusty ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandy-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff larish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robinzon diaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/wrapping-up-the-trade/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After some extensive reflection I’ve come to the conclusion that this deal will never really sit well with me. By never I don’t actually mean for eternity, but at least until the fruits of the trade bear some sort of championship or something. That isn’t a reflection on the players the Tigers received, more on the circumstances and the players they let go. Still, there are ends to tie up and dots to connect and other miscellany in need of blogging.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/wrapping-up-the-trade/" title="Permanent link to Wrapping up the trade"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1130866_thumb.jpg" width="170" height="240" alt="Post image for Wrapping up the trade" /></a>
</p><p><span class="drop_cap">A</span>fter some extensive reflection I’ve come to the conclusion that this deal will never really sit well with me. By never I don’t actually mean for eternity, but at least until the fruits of the trade bear some sort of championship or something. That isn’t a reflection on the players the Tigers received, more on the <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10493760/Losing-Granderson-hurts,-but-Tigers-had-to-do-it" target="_blank">circumstances</a> and the players they let go. Still, there are ends to tie up and dots to connect and other miscellany in need of blogging.</p>
<h3>Roster Moves</h3>
<p>The Tigers are plus 2 on their 40 man roster once this deal is made official. Jon Morosi tweeted that the <a href="http://twitter.com/jonmorosi/statuses/6481575269" target="_blank">Tigers have let it be known</a> that <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1225&amp;position=P">Bobby Seay</a>, <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=2312&amp;position=C">Dusty Ryan</a>, and <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5128&amp;position=1B/DH">Jeff Larish</a> are on the trade block.</p>
<p>I can see trying to get something for players who aren’t in the plans, and it’s clear that Ryan isn’t a Jim Leyland favorite (and they signed Robinzon Diaz to a minor league deal today), but why hold space on the roster for <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1703&amp;position=P">Dontrelle Willis</a> or <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=2216&amp;position=OF">Don Kelly</a>?</p>
<h3>Lefty-palooza</h3>
<p>In the last 2 days the Tigers have picked up 3 left handed bullpen arms. The Tigers dropped Clay Rapada but they still have Fu-Te Ni and Seay on the roster. Now Thomas is kind of a question mark but the Tigers expect him to help at the big league level. <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=8739&amp;position=P" target="_blank">Daniel Schlereth</a> may need more seasoning in the minors and it remains to be seen if the Tigers will use <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5535&amp;position=P" target="_blank">Phil Coke</a> in the rotation or the pen.</p>
<p>But more and more signs point to Seay being non-tendered. Seay would likely make about $2 million so that could potentially be another opportunity to save $1.5 million.</p>
<h3>Payroll</h3>
<p>Given today’s moves, and even allowing for a return by Seay, I have estimated the <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/tigers-payroll/">Tigers payroll</a> to be about $115 million heading into 2010. In 2011 that committed money drops to $49 million with Magglio Ordonez’s option and $34 million without. Of course that only accounts for 3 players so the Tigers would have some holes to fill.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I do believe that today’s move will have a negative impact on attendance before the season even begins. People are pissed and I’ve heard many say they are cancelling their season tickets. It wouldn’t surprise me to see outrage and empty checking accounts combine to knock down the season ticket base by 3000 which is roughly a quarter of a million tickets. It gets worse if the Tigers record sinks and let’s face it, this team isn’t as good as last year.</p>
<h3>Silver Linings</h3>
<p>Despite being bummed out that Granderson is gone, the reviews of the trade from around the country have been mostly favorable. <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=4725306&amp;name=law_keith">Keith Law</a>, <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-big-trade/">Dave Cameron</a>, and <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/1693/winners-and-losers-in-megadeal">Rob Neyer</a> have all said that the Tigers did well. Danny Knobler talked to several executives that thought the Tigers <a href="http://danny-knobler.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/8590096/18833096?source=rss_blogs_MLB">got a real nice collection of players</a>. Mike Rogers put some <a href="http://www.tigersbythenumbers.com/2009/12/trade-foolish-projections-ahead.html">estimates on performance and salary</a> and things seem to work out well in that regard as well.</p>
<p>I’ll just reiterate now that when I speak ill of this trade, it isn’t the players the Tigers got back. I think the Tigers got a decent package. I just never wanted to part with Granderson in the first place.</p>
<h3>The legacy</h3>
<p>Dave Dombrowski has made a number of bold moves in his career. He traded Randy Johnson for Mark Langston. He turned some blockbusters as the Marlins GM and the Miguel Cabrera trade was epic. But if this trade doesn’t work out (and we won’t know if it works out for a couple years), this will be his legacy in the Detroit due to Granderson’s popularity. It takes guts to make a move like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/wrapping-up-the-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day 2 Granderson and Jackson buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/day-2-granderson-and-jackson-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/day-2-granderson-and-jackson-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandy-trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/day-2-granderson-and-jackson-buzz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it seems that the blockbuster Yankees-Diamondbacks-Tigers trade may be a long shot at this  point, the Tigers will likely still continue to be active on this front. I’d still say that a Curtis Granderson trade is a long shot, but an Edwin Jackson deal seems likely. We’ll keep track of the buzz here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/day-2-granderson-and-jackson-buzz/" title="Permanent link to Day 2 Granderson and Jackson buzz"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/4109620600_633bdfcfe1_thumb.jpg" width="240" height="143" alt="Post image for Day 2 Granderson and Jackson buzz" /></a>
</p><p class="alert"><strong>UPDATE 1:37 PM:</strong>Shit. <a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6471060236">Granderson&#8217;s medical records sent to Yanks</a>.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 1:20 PM:</strong> We may know soon enough (or too soon if you ask me). Ed Price says the Tigers are waiting for the Yankees to sign off on 3-way deal and <a href="http://twitter.com/ed_price/statuses/6470664588">a decision is expected by 2pm</a>. Rosenthal <a href="http://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/statuses/6470643702">says one of the lefties</a> (Coke or Dunn) is out of the original deal. <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/hardball/after_setback_yankees_granderson_iQYDj1G4AqzN3n9kokryPI">Joel Sherman</a> has more on the framework of a proposed deal where the Tigers would get Schereth, Scherzer, A Jackson, and one other pitcher.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 12:33 PM</strong>: There&#8217;s way too much smoke for their not to be fire unless everybody is just getting their information from each other. Heyman just tweeted that a direct Yankees/Tigers deal would involve Granderson, Austin Jackson, Ian Kennedy, and Phil Coke. That&#8217;s not enough in my mind for Granderson &#8211; especially given his very reasonable contract and the fact the Tigers don&#8217;t HAVE to trade him.<a href="http://twitter.com/SI_JonHeyman/statuses/6469275325"> Another tweet</a> and its a 3 way where the Tigers get Scherleth, Scherzer, A Jackson, and Coke. A better haul to be sure. Everybody (ESPN, SI, Fox) is saying things that are way too similar here. Olney has info in the <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/hotstove09/news/story?id=4717538">ESPN live tracker</a> that the Tigers are the ones who reignited talks. I hate the idea of the Tigers compromising.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 11:28 AM:</strong>Jon Morosi notes that <a href="http://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/6467634568">the Tigers are interested</a> in Angels centerfield prospect <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=bourjo001pet">Peter Bourjous</a>. Bourjous posted a 281/354/423 line as a 22 year old at AA&#8230;Mark Feisand thinks the talks of <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/yankees/2009/12/winter-meetings-day-2.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nydnrss%2Fblogs%2Fyankees+%28Blogs%2FBlogging+the+Bombers%29">Granderson to the Yankees aren&#8217;t dead</a>, but it wouldn&#8217;t be for the same set of prospects as originally reported and throws in that the Mariners are expected to make a Grandy push. He also says <a href="http://twitter.com/BloggingBombers/statuses/6467867251">the Tigers may be caving on their price </a>for Granderson (NO!)&#8230;Jon Heyman says <a href="http://twitter.com/SI_JonHeyman/statuses/6467827349">the talks are being resuscitated</a> as well.</p>
<p><span class="drop_cap">W</span>hile it seems that the blockbuster Yankees-Diamondbacks-Tigers trade may be a long shot at this  point, the Tigers will likely still continue to be active on this front. I’d still say that a <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=4747&amp;position=OF">Curtis Granderson</a> trade is a long shot, but an <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">Edwin Jackson</a> deal seems likely. We’ll keep track of the buzz here.</p>
<p>As of 10:30 this morning, various sources are reporting that the blockbuster is <a href="http://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/6464945232" target="_blank">dormant</a>. The Yankees don&#8217;t like the prospect cost and <a href="http://twitter.com/SI_JonHeyman/status/6464627499" target="_blank">various</a> reports say the Tigers aren&#8217;t thrilled with their take either. Phil Rogers tweets that there <a href="http://twitter.com/ChiTribRogers/status/6466323268" target="_blank">is no movement on the Cubs front</a> for Granderson either.</p>
<p><small>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/soldiersmediacenter/4109620600/" target="_blank">The US Army on flickr</a>. As an aside, for all the talk of Granderson’s community service (which is warranted), Jackson is very active when it comes to working with soldiers and making appearances as well. The above photo was taken at Fort Hood this November.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/day-2-granderson-and-jackson-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winter Meetings Day 2</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/winter-meetings-day-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/winter-meetings-day-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam everett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brad thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandon lyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clay rapada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fernando rodney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george sherrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. putz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin gregg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramon santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zach simons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/winter-meetings-day-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first day of the Winter Meetings has come to an end and the sun is coming up on a snowy second day. For Tigers fans there was no shortage of news and drama. The recap follows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/winter-meetings-day-2/" title="Permanent link to Winter Meetings Day 2"><img class="post_image aligncenter" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/indywm1.gif" width="500" height="125" alt="Post image for Winter Meetings Day 2" /></a>
</p><p><span class="drop_cap">T</span>he first day of the Winter Meetings has come to an end and the sun is coming up on a snowy second day. For Tigers fans there was no shortage of news and drama. To recap:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Tigers were tied to several relievers including <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1793&amp;position=P" target="_blank">Kevin Gregg</a>, <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=6291&amp;position=P" target="_blank">George Sherrill</a>, and as of <a href="http://twitter.com/jonmorosi/statuses/6457003033" target="_blank">a late night rumor</a> <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1795&amp;position=P" target="_blank">J.J. Putz</a></li>
<li>Two of their own relievers both turned down salary arbitration in <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1312&amp;position=P" target="_blank">Brandon Lyon</a> and <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=494&amp;position=P" target="_blank">Fernando Rodney</a></li>
<li>The Tigers traded Clay Rapada to the Rangers for cash considerations</li>
<li>The Tigers signed reliever Brad Thomas who had pitched the last two years in Korea and they made room for him by outrighting Zach Simons to Toledo</li>
<li><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1430&amp;position=SS" target="_blank">Adam Everett</a> inked a 1 year deal to return and be the heavy side of a shortstop timeshare with <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1417&amp;position=2B/SS" target="_blank">Ramon Santiago</a>.</li>
<li>And there was a <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/granderson-and-jackson-nuggets/" target="_blank">bevy</a> of <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">Edwin Jackson</a> and <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=4747&amp;position=OF">Curtis Granderson</a> speculation culminating in a rumored  potential (and potentially dead) <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-blockbuster-that-stalled/" target="_blank">3-way deal</a> with the Yankees and Diamondbacks.</li>
</ul>
<blockquote class="right"><p>“Tomorrow will bring a different tone in conversations,” Dombrowski said Monday.</p></blockquote>
<p>Day 2 figures to have much more of the same, but talks <a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2009/12/brandon_lyon_fernando_rodney_d.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+detroit-tigers+%28Detroit+Tigers+Impact+-+MLive.com%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">are likely to intensify</a> as Dombrowski tries to sort out the back of their bullpen.</p>
<p>My feeling is that they don’t want to spend a lot, but that they want some established presence closing games. Lyon and Rodney were both in that mix had they accepted arbitration. Neither are necessarily out of that discussion but the Tigers no longer have to hold a potential spot for them.</p>
<p>And all those rumors swirling around the Tigers, <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20091208/SPORTS0104/912080327/1129/rss15" target="_blank">Lynn Henning caught up with Dombrowski</a>. Dombrowski said the deals make sense from a baseball perspective, but not to believe everything you hear.</p>
<p>Taking of some administrative functions, I ran things a little differently on the site with the most active (posts getting multiple updates throughout the day) or relevant posts staying at the top of the list with a carousel of recent posts at the very top. Does this work for people or should I return to straight reverse-chronological?</p>
<p>As a reminder,<a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-winter-meetings-at-dtw/"> there are many ways to follow the Winter Meetings</a> at the Detroit Tigers Weblog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/winter-meetings-day-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The blockbuster that stalled</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-blockbuster-that-stalled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-blockbuster-that-stalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max scherzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil hughes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-blockbuster-that-stalled/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi report that the framework for a blockbuster deal (h/t) between the Tigers, the Diamondbacks, and the Yankees was in place before at least one of the teams pulled out. The Tigers would have sent Edwin Jackson to Arizona, Curtis Granderson to the Yankees, and they would have received Max Scherzer with other young players floating to each team involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-blockbuster-that-stalled/" title="Permanent link to The blockbuster that stalled"><img class="post_image aligncenter" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/granderson-at-bat.jpg" width="520" height="285" alt="Post image for The blockbuster that stalled" /></a>
</p><p><span class="drop_cap">K</span>en Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi report that the framework for <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10475170" target="_blank">a blockbuster deal</a> (<a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/yanks-tigers-dbacks-discussed-blockbuster.html" target="_blank">h/t</a>) between the Tigers, the Diamondbacks, and the Yankees was in place before at least one of the teams pulled out. The Tigers would have sent <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">Edwin Jackson</a> to Arizona, <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=4747&amp;position=OF">Curtis Granderson</a> to the Yankees, and <a href="http://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/statuses/6453587012" target="_blank">they would have received Max Scherzer</a> with other young players floating to each team involved.</p>
<p>This would mesh with the various reports throughout the day that Arizona was looking like the destination for Jackson, and it also connects the dots on a report from Nick Piercoro about <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/NickPiecoro/69041" target="_blank">a third team being needed for the Diamondbacks to give up Scherzer</a> (<a href="http://www.blessyouboys.com/2009/12/7/1190525/jackson-to-d-backs-rumors-picking" target="_blank">h/t</a>).</p>
<p>From the sounds of the Fox Sports report it wasn’t Arizona who balked on the deal meaning it was the Tigers and/or the Yankees who passed. The Tigers had set their price for Granderson as Phil Hughes and Austin Jackson and with Jackson included in an outbound package I’d guess the Tigers would have been looking for Scherzer, either Jackson or Hughes, and then probably an additional prospect from the Yankees.</p>
<p class="alert">UPDATE: The Tigers would have received Scherzer, Jackson, Phil Coke, and Mike Dunn</p>
<p>What we don’t know is if this deal is dead, or just dormant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/the-blockbuster-that-stalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Granderson and Jackson nuggets</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/granderson-and-jackson-nuggets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/granderson-and-jackson-nuggets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/granderson-and-jackson-nuggets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no real news on the Curtis Granderson and Edwin Jackson trade fronts, but here is a roundup of some news and related tweets from this morning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/granderson-and-jackson-nuggets/" title="Permanent link to Granderson and Jackson nuggets"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/639108699_e01d28bb1a_m_thumb.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Post image for Granderson and Jackson nuggets" /></a>
</p><p class="alert"><strong>UPDATE: 10:01 PM</strong>: Things seem to have really slowed down. For Nightengale&#8217;s insistence that the Tigers want to move Granderson this week, <a href="http://twitter.com/cst_cubs/status/6445164004">others</a> <a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2009/12/are_mets_a_player_in_edwin_jac.html">aren&#8217;t seeing</a> the same things. Buster Olney on Baseball Tonight said the Tigers asked for Austin Jackson and Phil Hughes from the Yankees for Grandy and from the Cubs they wanted Starlin Castro and 2 pitching prospects. Phil Rogers says <a href="http://twitter.com/ChiTribRogers/statuses/6446774571">the Mariners may be in on Granderson</a> and Ed Price further confirms <a href="http://twitter.com/ed_price/statuses/6446789595">the Diamondbacks interest in Edwin Jackson</a>. And Dombrowski has <a href="http://twitter.com/beckjason/statuses/6446426460">a weak denial</a> (my interpretation) that the team is close to any deals.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 4:54 PM</strong>Foxsports.com <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10475170">has updated their site</a> reiterating that a deal is close for Jackson but still call Arizona and Seattle as the favorites. Joel Sherman said <a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6442936670">Mariners officials are downplaying their interest</a> while Ed Price said the Tigers are mulling over <a href="http://twitter.com/ed_price/statuses/6442261630">a dozen offers</a> for the right hander. Morosi says the <a href="http://twitter.com/jonmorosi/statuses/6442862738">Angels are still in</a> on both Granderson and Jackson.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 4:18 PM</strong>: Foxsports.com reports the Tigers are <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10475170">close to trading Jackson</a> and lists the D&#8217;backs and Mariners but rule out the Dodgers, Brewers, and Mets. Buster Olney tweets <a href="http://twitter.com/Buster_ESPN/statuses/6440712726">the asking price for Jackson is very hig</a>h. The Chicago Tribune says lobby buzz is that <a href="http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2009/12/curtis-granderson-a-yankee.html">the Yankees are hot on the trail of Granderson</a>. Ed Price calls interest <a href="http://twitter.com/ed_price/statuses/6442032431">lukewarm because of unwillingness to deal Austin Jackson</a>.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 3:14 PM:</strong>Ed Price <a href="http://twitter.com/ed_price/status/6440014794">tweeted rumor that the Mets acquired Edwin Jackson</a>, but then quickly <a href="http://twitter.com/ed_price/status/6440184494">clarified</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/KenDavidoff/statuses/6440324516">Mets officials issued a denial</a>.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>UPDATE 1:59 PM</strong>: Bob Nightengale tweets <a href="http://twitter.com/BNightengale/statuses/6438679050">the Tigers are close to trading Edwin Jackson</a>. No mention of where that might be though.</p>
<p><span class="drop_cap">T</span>here is no real news on the <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=4747&amp;position=OF">Curtis Granderson</a> and <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">Edwin Jackson</a> trade fronts, but here is a roundup of some news and related tweets from this morning.</p>
<ul>
<li>Joel Sherman spoke with an official from another team that thinks <a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6434202475" target="_blank">the Yankees really want Granderson</a>.</li>
<li>The Cubs and Yankees have been mentioned as two potential destinations for Granderson. Not coincidentally both have some interest in Mike Cameron and <a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6434118716" target="_blank">according to Sherman</a> the Cubs like Melky Cabrera. I don’t know what this all means.</li>
<li>Dave Sheinin of the Washington Post said the Nationals (<a href="http://twitter.com/nyp_joelsherman/statuses/6437187268" target="_blank">who just traded for Brian Bruney</a>) are looking for veteran starting pitching help and mentions <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/03/AR2009120303910.html" target="_blank">Edwin Jackson as a potential target</a> (<a href="http://www.federalbaseball.com/2009/12/5/1186410/washington-nationals-winter" target="_blank">h/t</a>). I don’t know that <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/baseball/mlb/12/01/farm.systems/index.html" target="_blank">the Nats have the pieces</a> to do it though.</li>
<li>Be it the Nats or one of the other 28 teams, Bob Nightengale surveys the buzz and <a href="http://twitter.com/BNightengale/statuses/6428517467" target="_blank">says Jackson will be dealt soon</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><small>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/spilt-milk/639108699/" target="_blank">yoppy on flickr</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/granderson-and-jackson-nuggets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tigers interested in George Sherrill?</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/tigers-interested-in-george-sherrill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/tigers-interested-in-george-sherrill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bobby seay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carlos guillen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george sherrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juan pierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/tigers-interested-in-george-sherrill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all the talk of the Tigers being broke, the Dodgers might be in a tougher situation. They didn’t offer any of their players arbitration and now they are looking to move players, including reliever George Sherrill. Matthew Pouilot notes that the Tigers might be a fit for a deal where Sherrill and a prospect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/tigers-interested-in-george-sherrill/" title="Permanent link to Tigers interested in George Sherrill?"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/3637171991_d9088cf6ed_m_thumb.jpg" width="240" height="187" alt="Post image for Tigers interested in George Sherrill?" /></a>
</p><p><span class="drop_cap">F</span>or all the talk of the Tigers being broke, the Dodgers might be in a tougher situation. They didn’t offer any of their players arbitration and now they are looking to move players, <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10357594" target="_blank">including reliever</a> <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=6291&amp;position=P" target="_blank">George Sherrill</a>.</p>
<p>Matthew Pouilot notes that the <a href="http://bases.nbcsports.com/2009/12/another-sign-dodgers-are-broke-sherrill-up-for-grabs.html.php" target="_blank">Tigers might be a fit for a deal</a> where Sherrill and a prospect head to Detroit in exchange for <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">Edwin Jackson</a>. Pouilot also mentions the Rangers, Rays, and Phillies as potential suitors.</p>
<p>The lefty reliever made $2.75 million last year and in 2010 he enters <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">his last year of arbitration eligibility</span> his last 2 years of arbitration eligibility before becoming a free agent. Sherrill keep his strikeout rate above 9 and he generally keeps his walks a touch over 3 except for 2 outlier years in 2006 and 2008. While his FIP projection is similar to Bobby Seay’s, Sherrill did it as a general reliever and not a LOOGY like Seay did making his numbers more impressive.</p>
<p>Steve Kornacki also concocts a Sherrill to Detroit trade scenario <a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2009/12/tigers_dave_dombrowski_heads_t.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+detroit-tigers+%28Detroit+Tigers+Impact+-+MLive.com%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">that also includes Juan Pierre and Carlos Guillen switching uniforms</a>. While getting out from under Guillen’s contract would be helpful the Tigers would be taking on $18.5 million of Pierre’s salary over the next 2 seasons. I also disagree with his assessment of Pierre helping the top of the order.</p>
<p>Sherrill would be a nice addition to the Tigers pen, but I’d be surprised to see the Tigers offering up significant players or money to acquire bullpen help given organizational depth provided by Robbie Weinhardt, Cody Satterwhite, Zach Simons, Casey Fien, and others.</p>
<p class="note">UPDATE 8:47 PM: Ned Colletti <a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/dodgers-notes-.html">shoots down rumors</a> about the Dodgers shopping Sherrill</p>
<p><small>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/keithallison/3637171991/">Keith Allison on Flickr</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/tigers-interested-in-george-sherrill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Granderson and Jackson rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/more-granderson-and-jackson-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/more-granderson-and-jackson-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/more-granderson-and-jackson-rumors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t know that we’ll cover every Tigers trade rumor here. It usually isn’t worth the effort, but there were some fairy significant reports regarding subjects of Edwin Jackson and Curtis Granderson.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">I</span> don’t know that we’ll cover every Tigers trade rumor here. It usually isn’t worth the effort, but there were some fairy significant reports regarding subjects of Edwin Jackson and Curtis Granderson.</p>
<p> The New York and Chicago media have been beating the drum for Granderson to land in their respective cities. Now there are reports <a href="http://www.newsday.com//sports/yankees-could-try-to-make-deal-for-granderson-1.1585007">that Dave Dombrowski has had discussions with the Angels</a>. The Angels have 24 year old shortstop prospect Brandon Wood who the Tigers may find appealing. Granderson would presumably move to left field with Torii Hunter manning center.</p>
<p>If the thought of trading Granderson is upsetting to you (it is to me), you may take some comfort in that at least <a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2009/11/will_the_tigers_trade_curtis_g.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+detroit-tigers+%28Detroit+Tigers+Impact+-+MLive.com%29">one AL executive doesn’t think it’s going to happen</a>.</p>
<p>On the Jackson front, the Tigers have talked with <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/69988612.html">Doug Melvin and the Milwaukee Brewers</a>. I’m sure they’ve talked with a number of clubs, but here’s the money quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Dave&#8217;s in charge of that one,&quot; said Melvin. &quot;They&#8217;ll identify which clubs are matches and they&#8217;ll call them. he&#8217;s looking for young players and young pitchers.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree with Jason Beck in that it sounds like the team <a href="http://beck.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/11/telling_comment_on_jackson_fro.html">is doing a little more than just listening</a> to offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/more-granderson-and-jackson-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the heck is going on (re: trade rumors)?</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/what-the-heck-is-going-on-re-trade-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/what-the-heck-is-going-on-re-trade-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandon inge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerald laird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/what-the-heck-is-going-on-re-trade-rumors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t remember the general manager meetings being this interesting in past years. Most of the action seems to usually take place at the winter meetings that take place in December. This year the GM meetings have served Tigers fans up with a disconcerting set of rumors with the Tigers making most of the team available for trade. But does this qualify as a fire sale?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">I</span> don’t remember the general manager meetings being this interesting in past years. Most of the action seems to usually take place at the winter meetings that take place in December. This year the GM meetings have served Tigers fans up with a disconcerting set of rumors with the Tigers making most of the team available for trade. But does this qualify as a fire sale?</p>
<p>It all started Tuesday night when the news hit that Edwin Jackson could be available along with Gerald Laird. Things got more interesting Wednesday afternoon when a New York Post story cited a National League executive who said the Tigers were <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/hardball/yankees_could_deal_for_tigers_granderson_ihbBrkhw4ntvdRpbuw2iJJ">listening to offers on Curtis Granderson</a>. Olney later <a href="http://twitter.com/Buster_ESPN/statuses/5627618227">tweeted</a> the same information. With two All Stars potentially on the block, a depressed economic region, and a payroll that leaves little flexibility the phrases “financial difficulty” and “fire sale” began working their way into columns. By evening <a href="http://twitter.com/SI_JonHeyman/status/5634838816">Jon Heyman added Brandon Inge</a> (h/t <a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/11/heymans-latest-lackey-tigers-reds.html">MLBTR</a>) to the list of those the Tigers could be looking to trade. Are the Tigers slashing payroll?</p>
<p>Dave Dombrowski <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20091111&amp;content_id=7654948&amp;vkey=news_det&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=det&amp;partnerId=rss_det">denied that the Tigers were in fire sale mode</a>. He also iterated that the Tigers don’t have a set payroll yet from Mike Ilitch. So if the Tigers aren’t cutting and slashing the payroll, what is behind all the rumor and speculation?</p>
<p>When the Jackson rumor hit we went through <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/is-edwin-jackson-for-sale/">a number of factors and possible scenarios</a>. With Granderson and Inge added to the list it clears up a lot of the possibilities but I don’t think it points to payroll slashing. What I do think it confirms – and this isn’t a surprise – is that the team likely has limited flexibility with their payroll.</p>
<p>What we’re seeing now is every player on the roster with potential value being floated. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Miguel Cabrera’s name or Justin Verlander’s names pop up in the coming weeks. The Tigers have holes to fill and limited means to fill them. They also have a number of contracts coming off the books after 2010. If the Tigers trade a player or two to fill a couple holes and get younger or cheaper at the same time, it’s a win – especially going into a season where playoff aspirations are likely limited.</p>
<p>Granderson, Laird, Jackson, and Inge all make some money, but the 4 are a relatively small part of the overall payroll. Moving one or two of them isn’t going to have a significant financial impact. It’s more a matter of improving the team in the long run. </p>
<p>With Granderson and Jackson in particular the Tigers would be able to net a <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10353396/Wednesday%27s-buzz-from-the-G.M.-meetings">significant package</a>. These players aren’t going to be given away which means that it is unlikely they are going anywhere, and if they do the team stands to be better for it.*</p>
<p> <small><em>*The above paragraph is my best attempt at taking a cold and analytical look at the situation. The fan in me is sick about the thought of Curtis Granderson playing for another team. So maybe on second thought the paragraph is an attempt at rationalizing the minimal likelihood of a Granderson trade to make me feel better.</em></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/what-the-heck-is-going-on-re-trade-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Edwin Jackson for sale?</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/is-edwin-jackson-for-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/is-edwin-jackson-for-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerald laird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/is-edwin-jackson-for-sale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been considerable speculation about the Tigers financial state. The payroll will be high, and there are continued questions about revenue potential. Mike Ilitch saw less advertising revenue. Attendance was relatively strong, but the Tigers missed out on any postseason gate receipts despite adding payroll midseason. Now Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi are reporting that Dave Dombrowski is listening to offers on Edwin Jackson.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/is-edwin-jackson-for-sale/" title="Permanent link to Is Edwin Jackson for sale?"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/money_thumb.jpg" width="279" height="210" alt="Post image for Is Edwin Jackson for sale?" /></a>
</p><p><span class="drop_cap">T</span>here has been considerable speculation about the Tigers financial state. The payroll will be high, and there are continued questions about revenue potential. Mike Ilitch saw less advertising revenue. Attendance was relatively strong, but the Tigers missed out on any postseason gate receipts despite adding payroll midseason. Now Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi are reporting that <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/10349688/Sources:-Tigers-looking-to-shed-payroll,-Jackson">Dave Dombrowski is listening to offers on Edwin Jackson</a>.</p>
<p>Jackson will likely command a salary of about $5 million in 2010 as he enters his 2nd of 3 years of arbitration eligibility and so a trade would seemingly be at least a year early. The salary wouldn’t appear to be prohibitive for a player that was <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1841&amp;position=P">3.5 WAR</a> last year and 1.5 WAR each of the previous 2 years. In other words, Jackson will have surplus value next year even he reverts closer to his 2007-8 numbers than his 2009 campaign. Of course value or not, cash is cash and if the Tigers don’t have the money they don’t have the money regardless of the value.</p>
<p>Aside from money, or perhaps in addition to it, are there are reasons why trading Jackson may be desirable?</p>
<h3>The Sell High theory</h3>
<p><strong>Why this makes sense: </strong>Jackson is coming off legitimately the best season of his career. His 3.62 ERA was stellar, but he pitched into some luck without a remarkable strike out rate. His FIP ERA was 4.28. Definitely above average, but not eye-popping. Jackson faded down the stretch – badly. Perhaps the Tigers think Jackson hit his ceiling and they don’t think he can replicate or build upon his 2009 season. They know that Jim Leyland rode him pretty hard and they’re worried about his health or stamina going forward.</p>
<p>Bill James predicts his FIP to balloon back to 4.72 for the 2010 season. If the Tigers can parlay his 2009 season into younger/cheaper talent it may make sense to move now.</p>
<p><strong>Why this doesn’t make sense: </strong>As mentioned earlier, Jackson is still a good bet to be a good value as long as he remains under club control. Plus, opposing GM’s have access to all these same stats and circumstances. Also, the Tigers would need to replace over 200 innings of above league average  production and it&#8217;s doubtful that talent exists currently in the organization. This leads us to…</p>
<h3>Freeing up money for a big move theory</h3>
<p><strong>Why this makes sense: </strong>The Tigers were <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/10/tigers-not-tapped-out-in-on-chapman/">reported to meet with Aroldis Chapman</a> who will command big money. Perhaps the Tigers think they have a shot at Chapman and that he could step right into the rotation. I don’t know how Chapman’s contract would be structured, but it seems reasonable that he would make comparable money (or perhaps a little less) than Jackson in 2010. The upshot is the team gets younger without adding payroll in the coming season – and they get some prospects.</p>
<p><strong>Why this doesn’t make sense:</strong> Lots of teams want Chapman and that would be a lot of eggs to put in a basket that may be full of holes.</p>
<h3>Pitcher X is ready theory</h3>
<p><strong>Why this makes sense:</strong> Andy Oliver, the Tigers 2009 second round pick was aggressively sent to the Arizona Fall League where he’s had some success after getting roughed up in his first outing. Are the Tigers looking at a rotation of Verlander/Porcello/Bonderman/Oliver/Robertson in 2010? The Tigers are paying Bonderman and Robertson (and Willis) no matter what so they might as well try and extract something from them. They aren’t movable but Jackson is. Plus the Tigers have been aggressive in their promotions in the past.</p>
<p>You could also make the case that the Tigers think they have found something in Scot Drucker. He’s also been strong in the AFL and <a href="http://tigers.scout.com/2/915740.html">he could find himself in the mix as well</a> come April 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Why this doesn’t make sense: </strong>Oliver is very talented and could prove to be a great pick in the second round. But he has 12 professional inning at this point and a 13:8 K:BB ratio. I’m not saying that Oliver couldn’t make starts at some point in 2010 – or even break camp in the rotation – but to pencil him in 3 months before spring training starts would be kind of crazy.</p>
<p>Drucker is probably a more legitimate candidate for this spot, but I don’t think he’s at the point where the Tigers would be freeing up a rotation spot for him.</p>
<h3>Playing for beyond 2010</h3>
<p><strong>Why this makes sense: </strong>As challenged as the Tigers will be with payroll in 2010, things get better in 2011. Robertson, Bonderman’s, Inge’s, and Willis’ contracts all come off the books and because of Ordonez’s limited playing time in 2009 he isn’t a sure bet to vest for 2011. Maybe the Tigers bite the bullet in 2010 knowing that things will be better in the future with a core of Miguel Cabrera, Curtis Granderson, Justin Verlander, Rick Porcello and hopefully developing youngsters Scott Sizemore, Alex Avila, and Ryan Perry.</p>
<p>Conversely, they may view the division as so weak that even in a re-tooling season they could hang around enough in the AL Central to make things interesting.</p>
<p>If Jackson isn’t required under these scenarios, now might be the time to trade him because his value may not be appreciably higher after the 2010 season. If he can replicate 2009 next year it would further establish that 2009 was a break through rather than a fluke, but it would also take away a year of club control for the receiving team.</p>
<p><strong>Why this doesn’t make sense: </strong>The Tigers will still have over a $100 million payroll without Jackson and that is too much for a re-tooling team. The Tigers are likely to be turning to a younger middle infield already, as well as a new closer most likely. If the payroll is too high for a non-competing team then the talent without Jackson probably isn’t sufficient for a middling team.</p>
<h3>Putting it together</h3>
<p>If the Tigers are serious about trading Jackson, there are probably facets of each of the above scenarios that come into play. Even then, the overarching motivation is probably money. The same Fox Sports article also mentioned that industry sources are saying that Gerald Laird is available as well further leading to the cash flow theory. But at the same time <a href="http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2009/11/reliever_brandon_lyon_interest.html">the Tigers are still talking about bringing Brandon Lyon back</a> and he’ll command a salary similar to what Jackson would make.</p>
<p>As long as Mike Ilitch is mum on the payroll fans are left to speculate as to how Dombrowski will improve a team with many question marks on a tight budget. Unconventional moves like flipping Jackson may the only recourse to get through to the salary relief coming after 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/11/is-edwin-jackson-for-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Star Game 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/all-star-game-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/all-star-game-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandon inge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin verlander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/all-star-game-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With four Tigers on the roster, it only seems fitting that we have a game thread. Plus it gives me a chance to catch-up on some All Star related linking. Most newsworthy and relevant is the fact that Evan Longoria is out with an infected ring finger. Michael Young will start at third base, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>With four Tigers on the roster, it only seems fitting that we have a game thread. Plus it gives me a chance to catch-up on some All Star related linking.</p>
<p>Most newsworthy and relevant is the fact that <a href="http://beck.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/07/longoria_injured_shuffle_at_3b.html">Evan Longoria is out</a> with an infected ring finger. Michael Young will start at third base, but maybe this gets Inge to the game earlier? Chone Figgins was added to the roster in Longoria’s place.</p>
<p>Curtis Granderson is having a grand time and <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/big_league_stew/post/The-Grandstand-Greetings-from-StL-and-my-first-?urn=mlb,176275">blogging each day at the Stew</a>. Last night Grandy thought the Home Run Derby was a little long and tonight he hopes to schmooze the Pres and set up a meeting with the Secretary of Education.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/v/verlaju01.shtml">Justin Verlander</a> is sort of available tonight. According to Beck’s Twitter Verlander is <a href="http://twitter.com/beckjason/statuses/2641156624">only available if needed</a>.</p>
<p>This also gives me the opportunity to link up some Home Run Derby coverage. I intended to do an open thread for that as well. But I got home a little later than planned and I turned on the television to see Inge getting his complimentary Gatorade and Joe Buck joining the broadcast. Not really what I was hoping for on either account. But I don’t think it’s possible for <a href="http://beck.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/07/inge_i_was_actually_thinking_1.html">Inge to have a better outlook on the night</a>. Kurt did come away impressed with<a href="http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/home/2009/7/14/scott-pickens-is-good-at-pitching-or-why-brandon-inge-was-sh.html"> Scott Pickens arm though</a>.</p>
<p>Edwin Jackson took on the Army in a Playstation battle. Video is below:<br />
<object id="viddler" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="437" height="265" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/97219af4" /><param name="name" value="viddler" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="viddler" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="437" height="265" src="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/97219af4" name="viddler" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>So which Tiger will do the best tonight? Inge? Grandy? Jackson? Verlander? Or are you just hoping nobody gets hurt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/all-star-game-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Striped All Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/tiger-striped-all-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/tiger-striped-all-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandon inge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curtis granderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin verlander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/tiger-striped-all-stars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tigers are sending 3 representatives to the All Star game, and maybe one more. Justin Verlander, Edwin Jackson, and Curtis Granderson were all named to the AL All Star Game. Brandon Inge still has a chance ( a slim one) to get on the team if the fans vote him in. Verlander and his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Tigers are sending 3 representatives to the All Star game, and maybe one more. <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/v/verlaju01.shtml">Justin Verlander</a>, <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/j/jacksed01.shtml">Edwin Jackson</a>, and Curtis Granderson were all named to the AL All Star Game. Brandon Inge still has a chance ( a slim one) to get on the team if the fans vote him in.</p>
<p>Verlander and his MLB leading strikeout total was pretty much a lock for the squad and was likely voted in by the players. Jackson has had an exceptional first half, but a startling lack of run support has held him to 6 wins despite a sterling ERA. Still, the players thought enough of him to include him on the squad.</p>
<p>Granderson was a bit of a surprise. He’s had better seasons, but Lee points out that he is on pace for a 30-30 season and <a href="http://www.detroittigertales.com/2009/07/granderson-on-pace-for-3030.html">an argument could be made that he is the second best centerfielder in the AL</a>. Granderson was also a player selection.</p>
<div style="float:right;margin: 0 0 10px 10px;"><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://widgets.clearspring.com/o/4a4263777ca3b4e9/4a517269ab1302d7/4a429c64a8a4702b/1187ae1/-cpid/fd5cfd77a2d24977" id="W4a4263777ca3b4e94a517269ab1302d7" width="300" height="250"><param name="movie" value="http://widgets.clearspring.com/o/4a4263777ca3b4e9/4a517269ab1302d7/4a429c64a8a4702b/1187ae1/-cpid/fd5cfd77a2d24977" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /></object></div>
<p>That brings us to Brandon Inge. I’ve stumped for <a href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/vote-early-vote-often-vote-inge/">Inge already</a> and Jim Leyland opined that Inge should be backing up Evan Longoria. Instead that duty went to Michael Young who is on par with Inge offensively, but atrocious defensively. Defense doesn’t typically get you into the ASG though. But Inge does have a chance if he can beat out:</p>
<ul>
<li>Chone Figgins (which he should)</li>
<li>Ian Kinsler (who has a beef that he should be starting at 2nd)</li>
<li>Carlos Pena (AL homer leader)</li>
<li>Adam Lind</li>
</ul>
<p>So let’s see if we can get 4 Tigers to the All Star Game and <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090705&amp;content_id=5706712&amp;vkey=news_mlb&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=mlb">Vote Inge</a>. What works against him though is that he was the 2nd best third baseman, but it&#8217;s not as cut and dry that he&#8217;s the best of these 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/07/tiger-striped-all-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday&#8217;s Bloops and Blasts</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/fridays-bloops-and-blasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/fridays-bloops-and-blasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dontrelle willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin verlander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick porcello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/fridays-bloops-and-blasts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bunch of stuff that I should highlight or comment on that I just haven&#8217;t gotten around to doing so I&#8217;ll let others do it for me: Ian drops the hammer on Dontrelle after yesterday&#8217;s debacle. I give Ian credit for coming strong (damn, I sound like Jim Rome). I&#8217;ve yet to comment because while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A bunch of stuff that I should highlight or comment on that I just haven&#8217;t gotten around to doing so I&#8217;ll let others do it for me:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ian drops the hammer on Dontrelle after yesterday&#8217;s debacle. I give Ian credit for coming strong (damn, I sound like Jim Rome). I&#8217;ve yet to comment because while I&#8217;ve watched the replay, I still can&#8217;t even digest what happened. So take it away Ian: <a href="http://www.blessyouboys.com/2009/6/4/899017/d-train-disaster-red-sox-6-tigers-3">D-Train Disaster: Red Sox 6, Tigers&nbsp;3 &#8211; Bless You Boys</a><br />
<blockquote>Congratulations, Dontrelle.  You pitched well enough in the first four years of your career to get a $29 million contract.  You benefited from a career-worst decision by a general manager and owner who felt they needed to push their team through an open championship window before it closed.  You got to cash in on a 22-win season that took place four years ago.  Kudos to you, sir.  But this has been a massive failure.  Seriously, man &#8211; you and the Tigers should be done professionally.</p></blockquote>
</li>
<p>
<li>Here is a look at <a href="http://fireleyland.blogspot.com/2009/06/examining-edwin-jacksons-success.html">Edwin Jackson&#8217;s Success Through Pitchf/x</a>. It&#8217;s one of those posts that I&#8217;ve been wanting to do. It looks like the slider has more down action this year than last. (h/t <a href="http://blessyouboys.com">Bless You Boys</a>)</li>
<p>
<li>The folks at It&#8217;s Just Sports just relaunched their blog, and I was honored to be part of the <a href="http://blog.mlive.com/its-just-sports/2009/06/better_know_a_blogger_detroit.html">Better Know a Blogger</a> feature this week. </li>
<li>The Tigers recent struggles have people wanting change. Kurt<a href="http://www.mackavenuetigers.com/2009/06/04/the-changes-the-tigers-need/"> takes a rational look</a> some of the options the Tigers may have</li>
<li>And from the <a href="http://twitter.com/OFFICIAL_TIGERS/status/2033304814">Good News department</a>, Rick Porcello was AL Rookie of the Month and Justin Verlander took him the AL Pitcher of the month honors</li>
<p></ul>
<p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/fridays-bloops-and-blasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearing up some roster confusion</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/clearing-up-some-roster-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/clearing-up-some-roster-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armando galarraga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dontrelle willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edwin jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nate robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan raburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zach miner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tigers have some roster decisions looming with the imminent return of Jeremy Bonderman and Marcus Thames. In both cases there aren't clear cut performance based decisions on who gets sent down so things like options come into play. There has been some confusion about the option status and service time of various players so let's clear that up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">T</span>he Tigers have some roster decisions looming with the imminent return of Jeremy Bonderman and Marcus Thames. In both cases there aren&#8217;t clear cut performance based decisions on who gets sent down so things like options come into play. There has been some confusion about the option status and service time of various players so let&#8217;s clear that up.</p>
<p>MLB roster rules are never simple and chuck full of exceptions. While salary data and service time data is generally findable, options are harder to find and often requires combing through transaction lists. Fortunately for Tigers fans Eddie Bajek <a href="http://tigers-thoughts.blogspot.com/2008/09/service-time-estimates-and-options.html">compiled this information</a> during the offseason.</p>
<p>When a player is on the 40 man roster and on neither the disabled list or the 25 man roster, they are on OPTIONAL assignment to another club. There is a limit to the number of years that a player can be on optional assignment and these are commonly refered to OPTIONS or OPTION YEARS. If said player is using an option in a given year, they can be recalled an optioned to the minors repeatedly without burning additional options. For example, Wilkin Ramirez was added to the 40 man roster prior to the season. During spring training he was optioned to Toledo so he used an option. When the Tigers recalled him while Magglio Ordonez was on bereavement leave and subsequently optioned back to Toledo, he didn&#8217;t use an additional option. It is still just one option.</p>
<p>Players typically have 3 options. This is to keep a team from burying a player in the minors forever which helps the player and helps distribute talent around the league. There are some exceptions where a player can have a 4th option year, based on when they were added to the 40 man roster but this is fairly rare.</p>
<p>Those are options in their simplest terms, now let&#8217;s take a look how it applies to a couple of Tigers:</p>
<p><strong>Zach Miner</strong>: Zach Miner was added to the 40 man roster when he was called up by the Tigers during the 2006 season. He then spent the rest of the year on the active roster meaning that no option was used. In 2007 he split time in the minors and the majors meaning he used his 1st option year. Last year Miner was optioned to Toledo on July 2nd. So you&#8217;d think he would use an option, but to actually use the option you need to be on optional assignment for at least 20 days. Miner was backing pitching for the Tigers by July 21st and remained up the rest of the year. So he has 2 options remaining.</p>
<p><strong>Armando Galarraga</strong>: This one had me fooled. The Rangers purchased his contract ahead of the 2006 season and he spent the bulk of that season and 2007 in the minors meaning he had used 2 options when the Tigers acquired him. He was assigned to Toledo to start the 2008 season but he was recalled prior to the 20 day rule meaning he has one option remaining.</p>
<p><strong>Dontrelle Willis &amp; Nate Robertson</strong>: Both players came up and when they were added to the 40 man roster earlier in their careers they pretty much stuck. Nate used one option early in his career but Dontrelle had his full slate going into 2008. Well last year  Willis used an option but it was completely at the club&#8217;s discretion. It a player has more than 5 years since their debut the player has the right to refuse the assignment. So Willis has 2 options, Nate has 3, but both could theoretically refuse optional assignment.</p>
<p><strong>Ryan Raburn:</strong> Raburn started the year in the minors initiating his last option year. There is another caveat (and one that applies to Willis and Robertson as well) is that if it is more than 3 years after the debut a player must pass through revocable waivers before being optioned down. This shouldn&#8217;t be an issue though.</p>
<p><strong>Clete Thomas &amp; Jeff Larish:</strong> This is their second option year meaning that he&#8217;ll have one left after this year.</p>
<p>The above are the main candidates who could be bumped with the return of Thames and Bonderman and perhaps you learned something along the way. Big thanks to Eddie who captured all the information and presented it so succinctly. To see the option status for the rest of the Tigers be sure to check out his site.</p>
<h3>Edwin Jackson</h3>
<p>There has been some misinformation being floated around that Edwin Jackson is set to become a free agent. Seeing as we are talking about roster business I figured this should be addressed as well. To become a big league free agent you need 6 years of service time. Jackson came into this year with 3 years and 70 days (often seen as 3.070 years). He will be arbitration eligible in both 2010 and 2011 and won&#8217;t become a free agent until 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/06/clearing-up-some-roster-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

