<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; 5th starter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/tag/5th-starter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Porcello Kid</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/02/this-porcello-kid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/02/this-porcello-kid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th starter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick porcello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spring training is never short on stories about guys being in the best shape of their lives, or young kids making a favorable impressions on the coaching staff. But the Rick Porcello hype is reaching a fever pitch, and the first spring training game hasn&#8217;t even been played yet. Jim Leyland made the familiar comments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Spring training is never short on stories about guys being in the best shape of their lives, or young kids making a favorable impressions on the coaching staff. But the Rick Porcello hype is reaching a fever pitch, and the first spring training game hasn&#8217;t even been played yet.</p>
<p>Jim Leyland made the familiar comments about taking the best players early on, and the brass mentioned Rick Porcello has an outside candidate for the 5th starter spot. I pretty much shrugged off that talk for the following reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>The Tigers already have 3 candidates for the 5th starter spot (Willis/Robertson/Miner) and will already be sending a player with a substantial contract someplace other than the rotation.</li>
<li>It seemed more like a managerial challenge to both the rookie, as well as the other guys in competition to see how they would respond.</li>
<li>Porcello spent last year on a strict pitch count limit with a hard stop at 75 pitches. Plus, the hard stop not only held down his intra-game workload, but it held down his seasonal workload at 125 innings. Breaking camp with the team would be a significant jump in required workload.</li>
</ol>
<p>But then <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090222/SPORTS02/902220431/1048/rss03">Jim Leyland said</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You can protect (one) pitcher in the majors &#8212; maybe one starting and relieving. &#8230; In other words, you can make up your mind that a starter is going to pitch five or six innings and get him out of there &#8212; you can do that a few times. You can&#8217;t do it all the time. &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Presumably Porcello wouldn&#8217;t be at the 75 pitch limit, but even a 90 or 100 pitch limit for a full big league season would be a significant jump in workload. In the minors Porcello was focused on using his 2 seamer to get groundball outs early in the count. He was quite effective in this regard and it had 2 effects. One, he only needed about 14.4 pitches per inning. Second, it limited his strike outs to a low 5.1 per 9 innings. At the big league level he&#8217;d be looked to employ his full arsenal and miss more bats (I&#8217;d hope anyways), thus driving up his pitch count.</p>
<p>PECOTA player cards aren&#8217;t available for pitchers yet, but I&#8217;d guess that the system doesn&#8217;t love Porcello at this point due to the low strike out numbers. But scouts and <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=law_keith&#038;id=3840355">people who know</a> these things felt that Porcello had pitches that were <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2009/267222.html">big league</a> quality <a href="http://www.saberscouting.com/2008/04/16/rickporcelloreport2-2/">at the beginning of last year</a>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m less concerned with Porcello being rushed due to his stuff needing more refinement (though some time to work on the pitches that were de-emphasized last year might not be a bad thing) and more so from a workload perspective. Unlike the Jeremy Bonderman situation where there weren&#8217;t really other options, the Tigers  do have a couple other arms to consider for the spot. I wouldn&#8217;t be opposed to Porcello breaking camp with the team, but I&#8217;d probably prefer more of the Justin Verlander approach where he makes a couple spot starts to fill in for injuries or double headers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/02/this-porcello-kid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

