<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Tigers got</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith (Mr. X)</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136139</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith (Mr. X)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136139</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m  Austin Jackson&#039;s #1 fan here. I wasn&#039;t an Austin Jackson fan before, but now that he&#039;s a Tiger, he&#039;s one of my favorite players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m  Austin Jackson&#8217;s #1 fan here. I wasn&#8217;t an Austin Jackson fan before, but now that he&#8217;s a Tiger, he&#8217;s one of my favorite players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136122</guid>
		<description>Ideas that are bugging me:

1.  The trade was caused by overpaying Ordonez, Willis, Robertson, etc.

John Paul Morosi wrote an article on this and many people seem to agree, but the argument is extremely weak on many levels.  The presumption seems to be the Tigers are under an NFL-style salary cap.  What would 10 or 20M less in salary really change?  Maybe you could add talent through payroll instead of through trade, but maybe thats not enough.  Instead of crticizing DD for overpaying, lets give some credit to Illitch for being willing to overspend and attract marquee players to Detroit.  We had a winner in &#039;06 and a contender last season....Back to my original point.  The trade makes sense on many fronts.  If you&#039;re going to &quot;blame&quot; something, you can blame the teams failures last seasons, Granderson&#039;s inability to hit lefties, EJax 2nd half fade, Granderson&#039;s marketability making him more valuable as a team member than a baseball player, the mediocre farm system and talent development, etc.  Writers and fans looking for a simple and easy answer (its money!) to explain this need to dig and think a little deeper.  The Tigers had to get better for a lot of reasons and couldn&#039;t keep pulling out the Illitch&#039;s wallet to do it.  Yes, some investments made painted the team into a corner with limited flexibility, but thats just one of many reasons why this trade went down.

2.  Austin Jackson swings this deal.

Reallly?  If Scherzer becomes a second ace to pair with JV, this isn&#039;t a homerun trade for the Tigers?  If Granderson becomes a mediocre hitting platoon player and EJax fades into NL mediocrity is this not a good trade?  If Schlereth and Coke join Zumaya and Perry to form a dominant bullpen for years, this isn&#039;t a good trade?  The Tigers got 4 quality prospects.  Deciding the trade hinges on one of them is preposterous.

3.  Curtis Granderson will always be a Tiger.

I&#039;ve said as much myself.  Its natural to form attachment to players you spend a lot of time cheering for, especially over a long period of time.  But as a few people have touched on, its completely irrational.  Curtis is probably extremely happy about this opportunity.  He&#039;s getting promoted to the highest stage in baseball.  It may not be great for you and me as Tiger fans, but our adoration doesn&#039;t go both ways.  This is worth remembering.  Don&#039;t shed tears for Curtis, because he isn&#039;t shedding them for you.  Nor should he.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideas that are bugging me:</p>
<p>1.  The trade was caused by overpaying Ordonez, Willis, Robertson, etc.</p>
<p>John Paul Morosi wrote an article on this and many people seem to agree, but the argument is extremely weak on many levels.  The presumption seems to be the Tigers are under an NFL-style salary cap.  What would 10 or 20M less in salary really change?  Maybe you could add talent through payroll instead of through trade, but maybe thats not enough.  Instead of crticizing DD for overpaying, lets give some credit to Illitch for being willing to overspend and attract marquee players to Detroit.  We had a winner in &#8217;06 and a contender last season&#8230;.Back to my original point.  The trade makes sense on many fronts.  If you&#8217;re going to &#8220;blame&#8221; something, you can blame the teams failures last seasons, Granderson&#8217;s inability to hit lefties, EJax 2nd half fade, Granderson&#8217;s marketability making him more valuable as a team member than a baseball player, the mediocre farm system and talent development, etc.  Writers and fans looking for a simple and easy answer (its money!) to explain this need to dig and think a little deeper.  The Tigers had to get better for a lot of reasons and couldn&#8217;t keep pulling out the Illitch&#8217;s wallet to do it.  Yes, some investments made painted the team into a corner with limited flexibility, but thats just one of many reasons why this trade went down.</p>
<p>2.  Austin Jackson swings this deal.</p>
<p>Reallly?  If Scherzer becomes a second ace to pair with JV, this isn&#8217;t a homerun trade for the Tigers?  If Granderson becomes a mediocre hitting platoon player and EJax fades into NL mediocrity is this not a good trade?  If Schlereth and Coke join Zumaya and Perry to form a dominant bullpen for years, this isn&#8217;t a good trade?  The Tigers got 4 quality prospects.  Deciding the trade hinges on one of them is preposterous.</p>
<p>3.  Curtis Granderson will always be a Tiger.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said as much myself.  Its natural to form attachment to players you spend a lot of time cheering for, especially over a long period of time.  But as a few people have touched on, its completely irrational.  Curtis is probably extremely happy about this opportunity.  He&#8217;s getting promoted to the highest stage in baseball.  It may not be great for you and me as Tiger fans, but our adoration doesn&#8217;t go both ways.  This is worth remembering.  Don&#8217;t shed tears for Curtis, because he isn&#8217;t shedding them for you.  Nor should he.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136086</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136086</guid>
		<description>OK... here are my thoughts.

Incoming players:

Max Scherzer: 25 yr-old right handed pitcher; 1.5 seasons in the majors.   Strong fastball/strikeout pitcher.   Weak point is control.    I like his potential.    A year younger than Edwin Jackson; hopefully he can step into his role.

Phil Coke: So-so left handed reliever.   Not sure what to think.   Fu Te-Ni and Bobby Seay are lefties.   Perry, Zumaya, Dolsi are righties (assuming Zumaya is back).

Austin Jackson:  22 yr-old who batted .300 at AAA.   His minor league stats are somewhat similar to Granderson although he&#039;s moved up faster.    More on Granderson later

Dan Schlereth:  No clue.   First round draft pick in 2008.   Pushed to the majors in 2009 and did poorly - but jumped from AA where he had a 1.01 ERA in 20 games.   Too early to say.   Another lefty.

Outgoing players:

Curtis Granderson: Coming off his worst season - batting .249 (although with 30 homers).    I&#039;m actually not a huge Granderson fan.   He&#039;s struck out over 140 times 3 of the last 4 seasons with a peak of 170ish.   He&#039;s got a lot of speed - but trading in his BA for 30 HRs doesn&#039;t help, IMO.    In reality, Granderson is an average player who had one good season (2007) where he batted .300.   I know he&#039;s a fan favorite; but I think Jackson will be better in the long run.

Edwin Jackson:  Coming off his best season (by far, IMO).   Jackson had 3 full seasons in the majors with ERAs of 5.76, 4.42, and 3.62.   This is a risk, if the 3.62 is for real.   Scherzer has more power and pitched better at age 24 than Jackson did (that was Jackson&#039;s 4.42 ERA year).   Scherzer was, I think, 4.02 last year.    My gut tells me that Scherzer&#039;s fastball will make him a better risk in the long run.

So... on balance - I like the trade (sorry, Tigers fans).    The Tigers get 4 players in exchange for 2.   Scherzer has a slightly better chance of success than E. Jackson, IMO.    A. Jackson has upside; Granderson doesn&#039;t.   And the Tigers get two lefties for the bullpen that may or may not help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230; here are my thoughts.</p>
<p>Incoming players:</p>
<p>Max Scherzer: 25 yr-old right handed pitcher; 1.5 seasons in the majors.   Strong fastball/strikeout pitcher.   Weak point is control.    I like his potential.    A year younger than Edwin Jackson; hopefully he can step into his role.</p>
<p>Phil Coke: So-so left handed reliever.   Not sure what to think.   Fu Te-Ni and Bobby Seay are lefties.   Perry, Zumaya, Dolsi are righties (assuming Zumaya is back).</p>
<p>Austin Jackson:  22 yr-old who batted .300 at AAA.   His minor league stats are somewhat similar to Granderson although he&#8217;s moved up faster.    More on Granderson later</p>
<p>Dan Schlereth:  No clue.   First round draft pick in 2008.   Pushed to the majors in 2009 and did poorly &#8211; but jumped from AA where he had a 1.01 ERA in 20 games.   Too early to say.   Another lefty.</p>
<p>Outgoing players:</p>
<p>Curtis Granderson: Coming off his worst season &#8211; batting .249 (although with 30 homers).    I&#8217;m actually not a huge Granderson fan.   He&#8217;s struck out over 140 times 3 of the last 4 seasons with a peak of 170ish.   He&#8217;s got a lot of speed &#8211; but trading in his BA for 30 HRs doesn&#8217;t help, IMO.    In reality, Granderson is an average player who had one good season (2007) where he batted .300.   I know he&#8217;s a fan favorite; but I think Jackson will be better in the long run.</p>
<p>Edwin Jackson:  Coming off his best season (by far, IMO).   Jackson had 3 full seasons in the majors with ERAs of 5.76, 4.42, and 3.62.   This is a risk, if the 3.62 is for real.   Scherzer has more power and pitched better at age 24 than Jackson did (that was Jackson&#8217;s 4.42 ERA year).   Scherzer was, I think, 4.02 last year.    My gut tells me that Scherzer&#8217;s fastball will make him a better risk in the long run.</p>
<p>So&#8230; on balance &#8211; I like the trade (sorry, Tigers fans).    The Tigers get 4 players in exchange for 2.   Scherzer has a slightly better chance of success than E. Jackson, IMO.    A. Jackson has upside; Granderson doesn&#8217;t.   And the Tigers get two lefties for the bullpen that may or may not help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136085</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136085</guid>
		<description>I think his point was actually a convoluted argument that they traded Granderson now rather than running the risk of holding on to him overly long, since apparently management has been psychologically damaged by the poor contracts they handed out in the past.  Seriously, that&#039;s what he&#039;s actually saying. His argument had nothing to do with payroll restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think his point was actually a convoluted argument that they traded Granderson now rather than running the risk of holding on to him overly long, since apparently management has been psychologically damaged by the poor contracts they handed out in the past.  Seriously, that&#8217;s what he&#8217;s actually saying. His argument had nothing to do with payroll restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136083</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, this whole thing hinges on Austin Jackson.  I think we&#039;re all comfortable here with dealing Edwin Jackson for Scherzer and Schlereth, and I&#039;m fairly comfident we&#039;ll come out ahead in that part of the deal if everyone stays healthy (that&#039;s a question mark for Scherzer in particular).  But getting marginal return for Granderson is what can ruin this trade.  If AJax can become a similar player to Granderson (not necessarily BETTER, just significantly better than replacement level), then this trade is palatable.  If not, I&#039;d have to say we gave away a core up-the-middle player with little to show for it.

I used fangraph&#039;s WAR numbers and projections to try and estimate some sort of balance among the players.  Based on their projections, Granderson is worth about 5.1 wins next year, and EJax 2.3 for a total of 7.4 wins we&#039;re giving up.  Coming back we get Scherzer at 3.2 wins (there&#039;s no projection for him so I conservatively guessed he will repeat his value of 2009.  I think this is fair since he will improve some but is moving to a tougher league), but not much value for Coke and Schlereth since they are relievers.  I pegged them at 0.2 and 0.5, respectively which might be aggressive.  That gives a total of 3.9 wins coming back, leaving a deficit of 3.5 wins.  This is the amount AJax would have to produce at in order to balance the trade in year one.

The only 3.5 WAR players last year were Nick Swisher and Jason Bay.  Some 3.6 guys were Todd Helton, Nate McLouth and Nelson Cruz.  Some 3.4 WAR players were Shane Victorino, David Wright, Juan Rivera, Brian Roberts, and..... Curtis Granderson (cosmic coincidence, no?).

Most of those guys have at least a decent amount of power, something that Jackson has not yet developed, so I would guess that for 2010, we probably come up a bit on the short end.  Longer term, Jackson apparently has the potential to eclipse those guys in terms of production, and if he does, we might look back and call this a favorable trade for the Tigers.

I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a better way to do this, so I&#039;d really like to see somebody else take a stab at it using whatever metric works best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, this whole thing hinges on Austin Jackson.  I think we&#8217;re all comfortable here with dealing Edwin Jackson for Scherzer and Schlereth, and I&#8217;m fairly comfident we&#8217;ll come out ahead in that part of the deal if everyone stays healthy (that&#8217;s a question mark for Scherzer in particular).  But getting marginal return for Granderson is what can ruin this trade.  If AJax can become a similar player to Granderson (not necessarily BETTER, just significantly better than replacement level), then this trade is palatable.  If not, I&#8217;d have to say we gave away a core up-the-middle player with little to show for it.</p>
<p>I used fangraph&#8217;s WAR numbers and projections to try and estimate some sort of balance among the players.  Based on their projections, Granderson is worth about 5.1 wins next year, and EJax 2.3 for a total of 7.4 wins we&#8217;re giving up.  Coming back we get Scherzer at 3.2 wins (there&#8217;s no projection for him so I conservatively guessed he will repeat his value of 2009.  I think this is fair since he will improve some but is moving to a tougher league), but not much value for Coke and Schlereth since they are relievers.  I pegged them at 0.2 and 0.5, respectively which might be aggressive.  That gives a total of 3.9 wins coming back, leaving a deficit of 3.5 wins.  This is the amount AJax would have to produce at in order to balance the trade in year one.</p>
<p>The only 3.5 WAR players last year were Nick Swisher and Jason Bay.  Some 3.6 guys were Todd Helton, Nate McLouth and Nelson Cruz.  Some 3.4 WAR players were Shane Victorino, David Wright, Juan Rivera, Brian Roberts, and&#8230;.. Curtis Granderson (cosmic coincidence, no?).</p>
<p>Most of those guys have at least a decent amount of power, something that Jackson has not yet developed, so I would guess that for 2010, we probably come up a bit on the short end.  Longer term, Jackson apparently has the potential to eclipse those guys in terms of production, and if he does, we might look back and call this a favorable trade for the Tigers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a better way to do this, so I&#8217;d really like to see somebody else take a stab at it using whatever metric works best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormin Norman $</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136080</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormin Norman $</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136080</guid>
		<description>Let the hand-wringing begin... and the comparisons to all the other lousy contracts the Tigers signed over the past few years - all irrelevant comparisons.

If the Tigers could have traded Robertson, Willis, Bonderman, Ordonez, Inge , etc they would have - but no other team is looking add overpaid underachievers - so the Tigers had to give up talent to get talent.

Now if last year Granderson had batted .349 instead of .249 and struck out only 40 times instead of 145 times last year - and batted .280 against left handed pitching, instead of the .180 he did, i could understand the outrage, but he didn&#039;t.

For once the Tigers made a trade for their future and sold high, rather than waiting until there&#039;s little or no value left in the player.

Hold off with all the b*tching until we see how this year plays out - and how the 6 players (the 4 new tigers and the two ex-tigers) produce in 2010 and 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the hand-wringing begin&#8230; and the comparisons to all the other lousy contracts the Tigers signed over the past few years &#8211; all irrelevant comparisons.</p>
<p>If the Tigers could have traded Robertson, Willis, Bonderman, Ordonez, Inge , etc they would have &#8211; but no other team is looking add overpaid underachievers &#8211; so the Tigers had to give up talent to get talent.</p>
<p>Now if last year Granderson had batted .349 instead of .249 and struck out only 40 times instead of 145 times last year &#8211; and batted .280 against left handed pitching, instead of the .180 he did, i could understand the outrage, but he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>For once the Tigers made a trade for their future and sold high, rather than waiting until there&#8217;s little or no value left in the player.</p>
<p>Hold off with all the b*tching until we see how this year plays out &#8211; and how the 6 players (the 4 new tigers and the two ex-tigers) produce in 2010 and 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormin Norman $</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136078</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormin Norman $</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136078</guid>
		<description>If and that&#039;s a big &quot;if&quot; Mauer goes anywhere (other than the Twinkies), its where the big dollars are - you know, as in the Yankees, Red Sox or possibly the Dodgers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If and that&#8217;s a big &#8220;if&#8221; Mauer goes anywhere (other than the Twinkies), its where the big dollars are &#8211; you know, as in the Yankees, Red Sox or possibly the Dodgers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen F.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136077</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136077</guid>
		<description>Preface: I am as big of a Granderson fan as anybody here, love the guy to death. That being said...(if you get upset by the below paragraph, read the last one before you respond)

I think everyone here is overlooking the fact that his numbers have declined two straight years from his magical 07 campaign. Areas that have declined: Hits, doubles, AVE, OBP (almost), SLG and OPS. HR have increased a bit, as have his walks, but he still strikes out way to much, despite apparent strides away from that trend in 2008. Also, he has never hit lefties well, and with a .183/.245/.239 line against lefties in 2009 at the age of 29 next year, it isn&#039;t like he hasn&#039;t had time to work on it. How much longer would he be a valid option in center? And at what price? Personally, I think about 3-4 years, but with a much increased contract. And he would continue to throw away 200 at bats per season against lefties. 

Why this trade is good for Grandy:
I think this trade can (and will) help his career immensely if he can handle playing in New York. I expect him to hit 30 HR and drive in 100 Runs in that matchbox of a stadium, especially with the short porch in right. Sitting a little lower in the order, around 5,6,7 slot should allow him to not need much better than a .260 AVE if he can continue to mash righties. The Yanks have that luxury that they can pay him good money to play mostly against righties and be productive. Plus, now that he has more spotlight hopefully he can win that Gold Glove he so deserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preface: I am as big of a Granderson fan as anybody here, love the guy to death. That being said&#8230;(if you get upset by the below paragraph, read the last one before you respond)</p>
<p>I think everyone here is overlooking the fact that his numbers have declined two straight years from his magical 07 campaign. Areas that have declined: Hits, doubles, AVE, OBP (almost), SLG and OPS. HR have increased a bit, as have his walks, but he still strikes out way to much, despite apparent strides away from that trend in 2008. Also, he has never hit lefties well, and with a .183/.245/.239 line against lefties in 2009 at the age of 29 next year, it isn&#8217;t like he hasn&#8217;t had time to work on it. How much longer would he be a valid option in center? And at what price? Personally, I think about 3-4 years, but with a much increased contract. And he would continue to throw away 200 at bats per season against lefties. </p>
<p>Why this trade is good for Grandy:<br />
I think this trade can (and will) help his career immensely if he can handle playing in New York. I expect him to hit 30 HR and drive in 100 Runs in that matchbox of a stadium, especially with the short porch in right. Sitting a little lower in the order, around 5,6,7 slot should allow him to not need much better than a .260 AVE if he can continue to mash righties. The Yanks have that luxury that they can pay him good money to play mostly against righties and be productive. Plus, now that he has more spotlight hopefully he can win that Gold Glove he so deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSE</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136075</link>
		<dc:creator>TSE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136075</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already forfeited my ticket options for next year.  I will not go to a game and support this team with what I consider to be reprehensible mismanagement that&#039;s gone on just far too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already forfeited my ticket options for next year.  I will not go to a game and support this team with what I consider to be reprehensible mismanagement that&#8217;s gone on just far too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSE</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136074</link>
		<dc:creator>TSE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136074</guid>
		<description>His HS stats could tell a lot of different things, or it could tell nothing of interest.  There&#039;s no possible way to know if there&#039;s interesting and useful information within his HS stats until you get to see them.  Some sets of stats are going to be useful for drawing relevant conclusions that pertain to the subject being discussed while others won&#039;t.  

For your second question, I&#039;m not sure what you mean or are trying to get at with that question.  I never said that nobody knows how to rank prospects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His HS stats could tell a lot of different things, or it could tell nothing of interest.  There&#8217;s no possible way to know if there&#8217;s interesting and useful information within his HS stats until you get to see them.  Some sets of stats are going to be useful for drawing relevant conclusions that pertain to the subject being discussed while others won&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>For your second question, I&#8217;m not sure what you mean or are trying to get at with that question.  I never said that nobody knows how to rank prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcm</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136072</link>
		<dc:creator>jcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136072</guid>
		<description>Now , they are a 1946´s baseball team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now , they are a 1946´s baseball team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Panas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136071</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Panas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136071</guid>
		<description>I think this was as much a salary trade as a baseball trade.  It could very well work out for them but I doubt they would nave made this trade if they had managed their payroll better the past few years.  

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this was as much a salary trade as a baseball trade.  It could very well work out for them but I doubt they would nave made this trade if they had managed their payroll better the past few years.  </p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Panas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136069</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Panas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136069</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m encouraged that scouts are still high on him but I&#039;m skeptical.  I need to see results soon.  He may have an upside but I see him as a huge question mark at this point.  

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m encouraged that scouts are still high on him but I&#8217;m skeptical.  I need to see results soon.  He may have an upside but I see him as a huge question mark at this point.  </p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136066</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136066</guid>
		<description>Hey I like Curtis Granderson as much as anyone and will miss him. I think as mentioned several times this is a pretty big PR bust. This is the fall out of the other bummer deals where the cash did not work into a fieldable player, but all that said, Since DD has had the keys we have had some good summers and as much as this hurts to say, I dont go to see Curtis or Edwin I go to see the Tigers and who they are this year and watch baseball.  Lets see how this all pans out, for my money I still think we need an other bat. With Everett at short and Inge at third and a new second baseman, the loss of CG.... I see us real short in the batting dept but top 8 in pitching (unscientific method).

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I like Curtis Granderson as much as anyone and will miss him. I think as mentioned several times this is a pretty big PR bust. This is the fall out of the other bummer deals where the cash did not work into a fieldable player, but all that said, Since DD has had the keys we have had some good summers and as much as this hurts to say, I dont go to see Curtis or Edwin I go to see the Tigers and who they are this year and watch baseball.  Lets see how this all pans out, for my money I still think we need an other bat. With Everett at short and Inge at third and a new second baseman, the loss of CG&#8230;. I see us real short in the batting dept but top 8 in pitching (unscientific method).</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith (Mr. X)</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136064</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith (Mr. X)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/12/what-the-tigers-got/#comment-136064</guid>
		<description>Probably not Mauer, but maybe next winter, the Tigers could flip some of these young guys for Hanley Ramirez.    

Other questions-
Did EJax&#039;s comment about Run support mean anything?-
 http://twitter.com/edwinjackson/status/2742217762

Is Granderson&#039;s top priority now a reality show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not Mauer, but maybe next winter, the Tigers could flip some of these young guys for Hanley Ramirez.    </p>
<p>Other questions-<br />
Did EJax&#8217;s comment about Run support mean anything?-<br />
 <a href="http://twitter.com/edwinjackson/status/2742217762" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/edwinjackson/status/2742217762</a></p>
<p>Is Granderson&#8217;s top priority now a reality show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

