The Detroit Tiger Weblog



« | »

Game 2009.153: Tigers at White Sox

PREGAME: The Tigers enter into their final road series of the season. They’ll face a White Sox team who was eliminated from the division crown last night. They’ll face a White Sox team who was just swept by the Twins despite having Mark Buehrle and John Danks go in the series.

The Tigers send out Eddie Bonine. Bonine makes just his 3rd start of the season, but it his second against the White Sox. Back when the White Sox were hot on the Tigers tails Bonine was called on to pitch the backend of a double header and he held the sox Sox to 3 runs in 6 innings.

Jake Peavy makes just his second start since the trade that sent him from the Padres. In his first time out he allowed just 3 hits and 2 walks over 5 innings to the Royals, but 3 runs came around to score.

Detroit vs. Chi White Sox – September 25, 2009 | MLB.com: Gameday

POSTGAME: I can’t really add much that won’t show up in a regular game story. Eddie Bonine allows 2 hits and takes a loss because the offense can’t get anything done. Heck the offense could barely put balls in play with 12 K’s. And Inge made an error. And Adam Everett was used as a pinch hitter for the designated hitter.

Posted by on September 25, 2009.

Categories: 2009 Season, Game Post

103 Responses

  1. Is this the first time we have faced Peavy and any idea if we have players that have faced him before. It is bad enough when the Tigers see new call ups for the first time and do nothing let alone a vet like Peavy.

    by Jason on Sep 25, 2009 at 5:52 pm

  2. didn’t throw one strike to Inge…..K

    just got back from three weeks in Michigan( no where near Detroit) ..glad to be back chatting with you all

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:30 pm

  3. The B.O.O.B.s are looking a bit flat tonight.

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:34 pm

  4. Eddie looks pretty good so far, though!

    by Kathy on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:40 pm

  5. go Eddie!

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:41 pm

  6. Our pitching is just so much better than last year…and it’s more or less the same guys (not to discount Lyon, who has been big)…

    Best offseason pickup: Knapp?

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:44 pm

  7. Pre ASG Maggs tonight. Guillen should hit number 3

    by Mcb on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:48 pm

  8. That should have read “bullpen / 5th starter pitching,

    I was thrown off when my iPhone autocorrected bull pen to bull pen*s…no joking…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:51 pm

  9. Actually, I beg to differ.

    Please, PLEASE, may I differ? Thanks…

    Maggs, during his MVPish years, accomplished the GIDP at a prodigious, almost Pudge-level rate

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:55 pm

  10. Now that would have been the comment of the night, Coleman.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:56 pm

  11. Well, that was sure a pretty throw by Avila. Looks like he’s been taking notes.

    by Kathy on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:56 pm

  12. Well, Bonine showed up tonight. Perhaps the offense can get going.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:09 pm

  13. That almost startled me as much as the time my iPhone started autocompleting words in French–ah, yes, it has realized it’s owner is a man of culture, n’est-ce pas? Like I’d type “diffic-” and I’d get “difficile”..

    And then it kinda freaked me out, thinking it actually had different autocorrect personalities, so I long-tossed it into the Pacific and bought a new one…

    (I’m just being a jackanapes about the long-toss thing…and also my phone doesn’t know the word jackanapes, which I guessed on a lucky hunch but just had to test).

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:14 pm

  14. And that should be “its owner” you auto-correcting, freedom-hating iPhone

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:16 pm

  15. Bonine is, um, half-decent so far…

    Hopefully the BOOBs will be a bit perkier next time through the line-up…then again, this is the ultimate compliment to Bonine–the team is hitting like Verlander is on the mound…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:20 pm

  16. Well Guillen had an argument there- Ramirez was definitely safe.

    by ouchudied on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:20 pm

  17. Bo………..way to go

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:22 pm

  18. KC had runners on first and second one out and the batter hit into an Ordonez!

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:23 pm

  19. Bonine is dealing tonight. Wish the offense would get inspired behind his effort and put up some crooked number.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:23 pm

  20. It’s like a disease that’s catching.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:24 pm

  21. Granderson isn’t making Peavy work at all tonight.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:25 pm

  22. Brandon’s got to make up for that screw-up.

    by Kathy on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:34 pm

  23. And now its a huge screw-up.

    by ouchudied on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:36 pm

  24. Tejeda looked like Cy Young against the Tigers and he looks like Loretta Young against the Twikies…6 walks

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:37 pm

  25. The Twins and White Sox have combined for 6 runs on 3 hits so far tonight…

    by Tbone on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:39 pm

  26. Inge is 0-3 with 3 K’s and an error. Where’s Stephen?

    by ouchudied on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:43 pm

  27. we better come back or it’s a 2 game lead…….twins won’t blow their lead.

    by mcb on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:44 pm

  28. We don’t need Stephen to spoon feed the obvious. Inge is horrible.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:45 pm

  29. I hate it when a pitcher goes from throwing a no-hitter to giving up a home run. Inge didn’t help matters at all there. It wouldn’t be quite so bad if the offense had at least pushed across a couple runs instead of the ol’ GIDP.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:45 pm

  30. looking like #43 in the less two runs derby

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:45 pm

  31. twins have 6 runs on 2 hits

    by mcb on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:48 pm

  32. Nothing is more frustrating than when the offense refuses to show up.

    One bad pitch — literally — determines the game.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:50 pm

  33. Let’s not go into panic mode, yet. There’s still time. That said, I just gulped down a couple xanax.

    by Kathy on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:52 pm

  34. I just can’t believe the freaking twins

    by Mcb on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:53 pm

  35. It’s a shame the Tigers hitters couldn’t support a gutty performance by Bonine. Up to the pen to keep any more runs off the board now.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:55 pm

  36. what a great job by Bonine tonight …wow

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:55 pm

  37. Yeah it’s pretty obvious Inge is horrible and the Twins will catch us…if only we had a 3rd baseman who was hitting .213 with no power we’d have a chance to compete with them…and his error clearly caused the home run pitch; in fact most home runs the Tigers have given up are actually Inge’s fault in some way.

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:58 pm

  38. Royals right back in it 6-4 now

    by Tommy B on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:59 pm

  39. Phew, Perry gets out of a jam. Lets get some runs :)

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:00 pm

  40. Coleman, no need to go into reality check mode. Let the poor guys vent. Can’t we just let perception be reality?

    by Neal on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:01 pm

  41. Nice to see Peavy not on the glassless bump anymore for the night. Maybe we can get to their pen

    by Tommy B on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:02 pm

  42. We’ve hit Dotel before.

    by Kathy on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:04 pm

  43. Billy Butler just hit a ball about 600 feet. Wow.

    by Jeff on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:06 pm

  44. It’s not Inge’s fault the team can’t come up with a clutch hit. And to give Inge his due, his play last night may have been the difference between a win and a loss. Errors are also part of the game. The error hurt, but who cares if the team can’t score? You can’t win if you don’t plate any runs — regardless of the pitching and defense.

    Be that as it may, Inge is absolutely lost at the plate tonight. Some of his strike outs border on the absurd — amplified, of course, in games where the division/playoffs are on the line.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:10 pm

  45. I don’t think we’ll get too many ABs vs Dotel…when a guy is throwing balls that Polanco won’t swing at he doesn’t last long

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:10 pm

  46. Well Magglio, at least with 2 outs and nobody on you couldn’t go for your 3rd GIDP of the night.

    by Andrew on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:11 pm

  47. its hard to stay awake while the Tigers are batting

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:13 pm

  48. An Inge error is kind of like a Cabrera GIDP…yeah it kinda bites but how much can you complain without being silly…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:14 pm

  49. The tigers have no MOJOE.You can’t have a team that doesn’t speak english good to win anything. They don’t have any leaders. There is no team RA-RA. How can 20 Latin players get excited about anything????????????????

    by pat on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:15 pm

  50. What? the Koreans and Japanese don’t speak any English and they were in the finals of the WBC…they looked excited too!

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:16 pm

  51. I hope you’re joking. And if you are joking, its a stupid joke. And if you’re not joking, you are an idiot, good sir.

    by ouchudied on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:29 pm

  52. Two hits allowed. And the lead shrinks. Something is seriously wrong with this picture.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:29 pm

  53. “”".You can’t have a team that doesn’t speak any English good to win anything. “”"

    I guess there is English, and again there is English!

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:30 pm

  54. Everett for Huff?

    I want me some. Whatever it is.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:31 pm

  55. I worry less about the Tigers than I do about the Twins these days. We are who we thought we were.

    They are on a streak for the ages right now.

    by Tbone on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:32 pm

  56. how bad a hitter can you be if Everett hits for you

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:33 pm

  57. Where is Thames? Why would you possibly PH Everett?

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:34 pm

  58. Pinch hit for Inge. Please.

    by Mark L on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:34 pm

  59. 43rd time two runs or less you are exactly right ..We are who we thought we are………………….

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:35 pm

  60. Thames is riding the pine. Where else?
    Bring him now, with a man on base.

    by Mark L on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:36 pm

  61. why in the world would you bat Inge here???????

    by Jud on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:38 pm

  62. Ugh.

    by Mark L on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:39 pm

  63. Well another tough loss where all we gave up was 2 freakin hits and still lose. I have said it before that if the Tigers don’t win the division you can pretty much lay the blame on the offense with another game in where they just can’t get it done. Peavy pitched well but they had chances to score and just didn’t ever get a big hit.

    by Walter55 on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:39 pm

  64. Thames should have PH for Inge.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:39 pm

  65. I second that.

    Really crummy loss. One friggin pitch.

    by Mike in CT on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:40 pm

  66. My point isn’t that Inge had an alright night. He didn’t. But when you score 0 runs, it’s a bit silly to complain about the performance of the #7 hitter. The only guy hitting was the #2 hitter, and the #3 hitter was following up with GIDPs, and the #4 hitter did nothing. Ill take nothing from the 7-9 hitters over nothing from the 3-5 hitters every day.

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:41 pm

  67. Leyland never pinch hits for Inge. Ever.

    And over the course of the season this has probably worked out well for the smokey one…

    I’ll bet if you go back and look at the comments on the games where Inge had walkoff/game-winning hits they were preceded by “pinch-hit for Inge” pleas…so Leyland doesn’t dare now…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:43 pm

  68. I wouldn’t always advocate PH for Inge, except maybe in the 9th inning late in September when your only hope to get a W and stave off a teaming charging hard is the long ball, on a night where Inge risks taking home a sombrero.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:49 pm

  69. Hey, glad everyone missed me. I’m not going to rail on inge, but the difference between him and the guy hitting .213 is about five million dollars and an inexplicable all star appearance. And adam everett batting for audrey hepburn really has to be the pinch hit of all time. Seriously, I know I will be making references to it when I’m 65. You have a roster of 33 and you pinch hit with the worst batter in the american league! That’s sort of awesome. I still say there’s no way the twins can take 3 out of 4 in detroit, which looks like the most likely scenario. I don’t want folks I’m only jumping in after a loss, tigers have impressed me this week. But losing with a two hitter with AE pinch hitting is depression city.

    by stephen on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:52 pm

  70. Kind of like this game:

    http://www.baseball-reference......9060.shtml

    by billfer on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:54 pm

  71. I’m voting no joke because of the “can’t have a team that doesn’t speak english good to win anything.” Because that is kind of ironically funny, perhaps, if you are responding to something on the topic, or if you hadn’t just spoken of “mojoe” and “ra-ra” But…whatever.

    It’s only confusing because he violates some stupid prejudiced generalization basics. Because Latin players are supposed to be emotional and excitable, doesn’t he realize (and also, in that illogical way of prejudices, lazy).

    But I wasn’t going to say anything at first, because why encourage him…and yet he’s had a rough season in New York, and he was a Tiger for a while, so I figured oh, why not give Sheff a break?

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:55 pm

  72. By the way, aforementioned third-baseman is hitting in the .340s range with multiple clutch hits/game winning hits over the 15 game run stretch in which the Twins shrunk their lead from 7 games to 2 games.

    Just sayin’

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:58 pm

  73. The 9th inning is the worst time to pinch hit for Inge…especially with Thames.

    2009 9th inning OPS:
    1.167 Guillen
    1.083 Inge
    .941 Granderson
    .802 Ordonez
    .694 Cabrera
    .655 Polanco
    .520 Thames

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:00 pm

  74. Ummm. We don’t do racism here. You can take that crap someplace else. Oh yeah, and you look like an idiot when you can’t formulate (make) a coherent (sensible) (not stupid) sentence.

    by billfer on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:00 pm

  75. I need some clarity on Granderson. I’m just mystified at his season. Need him to do something, anything.

    by Chief on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:01 pm

  76. Billfer, I don’t see the relevance of that box score, but I’m at a blackberry so maybe I’m an idiot. I do want to say inge’s play last night was awesome, but the rotary phone where I’m staying precluded saying ‘ingetastic.’

    by stephen on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:04 pm

  77. Are you talking about Buscher? (Tolbert is playing tonight).

    Combined they have 3 go-ahead hits for the entire season.

    Crede has 9 but he hasn’t played in weeks.

    Inge has 18.

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:09 pm

  78. Good job–especially putting the key sentences at the front…I don’t know if he’ll be able to navigate the parentheses…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:12 pm

  79. That’s the game where Inge stuck out 3 times (sound familiar?) then hit a 9th inning walk off grand slam…

    (and after the game gave props to Kirk Gibson, so extra credit for that).

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 pm

  80. To be clear:

    I’m not discounting Inge’s power or his occasional late-inning bomb. If you’re looking for a HR, and only a HR, odds still favor Thames hitting the long ball over Inge. Even so, I wouldn’t necessarily pitch hit for Inge in this situation, even given the odds, but there was just something sooooo circa 2008 about Inge’a approach at the plate tonight. Taking pitches right down the heart of the plate and check-swinging away. Sometimes a hitter just has an off night, and it looked like that kind of night for Inge tonight.

    Plus, the error may have got into his head a little bit.

    But maybe I’m just reading too much into it. The way all the Tigers were hitting tonight any one of them would have likely whiffed.

    by T Smith on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:21 pm

  81. Ah Coleman, that was with the bases loaded when everyone knows Inge channels Pujols. Inge’s problem starts when the pitcher doesn’t have to give him a strike. And man, I don’t buy that game winning hit stat. You can not convince me a guy hitting .215 since may 1 and .205 last year is anybody’s definition of clutch.that’s like saying steve forbes was a legit presidential contender because he won the delaware primary in 1996.

    by stepheb on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:24 pm

  82. Most likely to hit a home run (HR/PA %):

    1. Raburn (5.2%)
    2. Cabrera (4.9%)
    3. (tie) Inge (4.6%)
    3. (tie) Thames (4.6%)

    So Raburn would be a better choice than Thames…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:26 pm

  83. Well, first of all, my main point was that Leyland seems to buy it–when has he ever pinch hit for Inge?

    And Inge DOES fit some definitions of clutch, although obviously not yours, which seems too complicated for me, and involves removing certain months from statistics which is too much work for a lazy guy like me…

    There is a “there is no such thing as clutch situations” argument which throws out the whole idea of a “clutch” hitter; if that’s your point, then yeah, there’s something to that. But otherwise I can’t quite figure out what you WOULD call a clutch stat–I KNOW what his yearly/lifetime etc batting averages are, but the whole point of the “clutch” thing is that someone performs better than his usual same old when the game is on the line, so citing the players same old numbers doesn’t really answer the question.

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:34 pm

  84. Btw, I wasn’t suggesting pinch hitting for Inge. I’m just not buying Inge as Mr. Clutch

    by stephen on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:35 pm

  85. Inge has been the very definition of clutch this year. He has elevated his game in high leverage situations. He’s 16th in the majors in the Fangraphs stat called clutch which is a ratio of a player’s performance in high leverage situations to his performance in non-high leverage situations.

    Now that ratio is inflated by his dismal performance in most situations, but it is real.

    Personally I don’t think it is sustainable and I think it is more reasonable to expect him to perform at his overall numbers in all situations. But that doesn’t take away from what he’s done this year.

    by billfer on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:36 pm

  86. That’s one of the Brandon En-Inge-mas: not just that he excels in high-leverage situations, but his pure crappiness in other situations. In fact I think you’re half-right in that the ratio is inflated by his dismal performance in most situations, but it’s almost more like there IS no average situation with him–his average is more a mix of good and crappy, not a standard level from which he occasionally varies.

    Last season he was a sad .205, .672 OPS, but even that doesn’t cover how bad he was in some situations. With runners on base he was actually a decent .243/.790. But with bases empty he was a mind-boggling .176/.584. (!)

    So I think he actually is a good clutch player. And, conversely, a far worse un-clutch player probably than even Stephen thinks…

    by Coleman on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:50 pm

  87. You know, call me old fashioned, but you’re never going to convince me that a guy who has one of the lowest batting averages of anyone playing throughout the decade and will become the Tigers all time strikeout leader in about half the at bats as the other folks on that list is anyone’s definition. But then again, you guys thought Inge should be an all star. You’re right Coleman, about isolating stats. But isn’t that what you’re doing with the clutch hit stat? Suffice to say, even including April Inge is hitting roughly .222 over the last two years. Don’t like batting average? How about his OPS career wise? Ill even let you throw out his catcher stats! Can we just agree Inge is a great fielder a significantly below average hitter at the corner? I’ve always said bat Inge ninth and we’re fine. Bat him seventh, you aint winning a pennant.

    by stephen on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:53 pm

  88. “You have a roster of 33 and you pinch hit with the worst batter in the american league! ”

    Post of the night.

    by Kevin in Dallas on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:53 pm

  89. Ah coleman, I am no match on a thumbs only device for your dexterity. You have already outflanked my argument. I retire for the night. The tigers are still winning this.

    by stephen on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:58 pm

  90. Edit: I spoke to soon. Any DE ’96 primary reference = post of the night. I don’t even care if it is accurate (is it?).

    How about Ahmadinejad on LKL tongiht? That’s a lot what I envision arguing with Ozzie Guillen would be like. “Leht mee esk jou a queestion umpire-guy. Jou know what a beisball striike ees? Haou meeny beisball stiikes jid jou know es bout? Me oyes cabron?”

    by Kevin in Dallas on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:05 am

  91. And I hit enter too soon, and left out his Low Leverage numbers from last year:

    .156 / .588

    My point–if I have one–is that it’s not just that he seems to do better in high leverage situations, but also that he seems to do more poorly than you would expect in low leverage situations, which is something slightly different.

    by Coleman on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:06 am

  92. “I’ve always said bat Inge ninth and we’re fine. Bat him seventh, you aint winning a pennant.”

    Ironically, we’ve done best as far as W/L in games where he has hit either 6th or 8th…

    And we’re GONNA win a pennant with him batting 5th, 6th, 7th, or 8th…

    by Coleman on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:10 am

  93. The one thing I am certain of is the fact steve forbes won the delaware primary. It is a night I will never forget.

    by stephen on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:14 am

  94. did the Tigers play today ?? I slept thru the game hoping a loud crack of a Tiger bat would wake me up

    by Jud on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:17 am

  95. I remember what a shock that was…Delaware! It’s still a state, and people live there and everything!

    by Coleman on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:22 am

  96. Oops… i keep thinkin’ Punto is playing 3rd… Dunno what his overall average is, but .213 sounds about right.

    But now that you mention it, Tolbert (frickin Tolbert!) hit a clutch home-run in in Twins first win over the panty hose, which I believe was the deciding factor the Twins win in that crucial first game …

    by T Smith on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:26 am

  97. You slept through this game? Blasphemous! How can you now tell your incredulous grandchildren of some bygone era, of a simpler time before the end of the Mayan calendar, when you actually witnessed Adam Everett pinch hit for the DH (and in lieu of 33 other qualified hitters on the bench) with a game on the line that may have determined the pennant?

    by T Smith on Sep 26, 2009 at 12:41 am

  98. “You have a roster of 33 and you pinch hit with the worst batter in the american league!”

    He’s far from that vs. LHP.

    by Jeff on Sep 26, 2009 at 7:26 am

  99. Everett’s not so bad vs. LHP. The only guy I would’ve rather seen in there is Thames.

    by Jeff on Sep 26, 2009 at 7:33 am

  100. At least Bonine has some confidence going into his next start…

    by MCM on Sep 26, 2009 at 8:04 am

  101. If nothing more, I’m in awe of the irony of this post.

    by T Smith on Sep 26, 2009 at 8:42 am

  102. we need a new hitting coach to have the same effect that knapp has had on the pitching.

    by charlie on Sep 26, 2009 at 11:10 am

  103. I bet Eddie Bonine is sad you slept through it. That was a hell of a performance.

    by billfer on Sep 26, 2009 at 11:13 am

« | »




Recent Posts


Pages



About The Detroit Tiger Weblog

About the Site Detroit Tigers Weblog was launched in July, 2001. At the time it was the only Tigers blog and it resided as a blogspot page. There were multiple authors and it mostly consisted of links to the rare times the Tigers were mentioned in the national media. We only had a few dozen […]more →

Switch to our desktop site