The Detroit Tiger Weblog



« | »

Clearing up some roster confusion

The Tigers have some roster decisions looming with the imminent return of Jeremy Bonderman and Marcus Thames. In both cases there aren’t clear cut performance based decisions on who gets sent down so things like options come into play. There has been some confusion about the option status and service time of various players so let’s clear that up.

MLB roster rules are never simple and chuck full of exceptions. While salary data and service time data is generally findable, options are harder to find and often requires combing through transaction lists. Fortunately for Tigers fans Eddie Bajek compiled this information during the offseason.

When a player is on the 40 man roster and on neither the disabled list or the 25 man roster, they are on OPTIONAL assignment to another club. There is a limit to the number of years that a player can be on optional assignment and these are commonly refered to OPTIONS or OPTION YEARS. If said player is using an option in a given year, they can be recalled an optioned to the minors repeatedly without burning additional options. For example, Wilkin Ramirez was added to the 40 man roster prior to the season. During spring training he was optioned to Toledo so he used an option. When the Tigers recalled him while Magglio Ordonez was on bereavement leave and subsequently optioned back to Toledo, he didn’t use an additional option. It is still just one option.

Players typically have 3 options. This is to keep a team from burying a player in the minors forever which helps the player and helps distribute talent around the league. There are some exceptions where a player can have a 4th option year, based on when they were added to the 40 man roster but this is fairly rare.

Those are options in their simplest terms, now let’s take a look how it applies to a couple of Tigers:

Zach Miner: Zach Miner was added to the 40 man roster when he was called up by the Tigers during the 2006 season. He then spent the rest of the year on the active roster meaning that no option was used. In 2007 he split time in the minors and the majors meaning he used his 1st option year. Last year Miner was optioned to Toledo on July 2nd. So you’d think he would use an option, but to actually use the option you need to be on optional assignment for at least 20 days. Miner was backing pitching for the Tigers by July 21st and remained up the rest of the year. So he has 2 options remaining.

Armando Galarraga: This one had me fooled. The Rangers purchased his contract ahead of the 2006 season and he spent the bulk of that season and 2007 in the minors meaning he had used 2 options when the Tigers acquired him. He was assigned to Toledo to start the 2008 season but he was recalled prior to the 20 day rule meaning he has one option remaining.

Dontrelle Willis & Nate Robertson: Both players came up and when they were added to the 40 man roster earlier in their careers they pretty much stuck. Nate used one option early in his career but Dontrelle had his full slate going into 2008. Well last year  Willis used an option but it was completely at the club’s discretion. It a player has more than 5 years since their debut the player has the right to refuse the assignment. So Willis has 2 options, Nate has 3, but both could theoretically refuse optional assignment.

Ryan Raburn: Raburn started the year in the minors initiating his last option year. There is another caveat (and one that applies to Willis and Robertson as well) is that if it is more than 3 years after the debut a player must pass through revocable waivers before being optioned down. This shouldn’t be an issue though.

Clete Thomas & Jeff Larish: This is their second option year meaning that he’ll have one left after this year.

The above are the main candidates who could be bumped with the return of Thames and Bonderman and perhaps you learned something along the way. Big thanks to Eddie who captured all the information and presented it so succinctly. To see the option status for the rest of the Tigers be sure to check out his site.

Edwin Jackson

There has been some misinformation being floated around that Edwin Jackson is set to become a free agent. Seeing as we are talking about roster business I figured this should be addressed as well. To become a big league free agent you need 6 years of service time. Jackson came into this year with 3 years and 70 days (often seen as 3.070 years). He will be arbitration eligible in both 2010 and 2011 and won’t become a free agent until 2012.

Posted by on June 4, 2009.

Tags: , , , , ,

Categories: 2009 Season, Injuries, Roster Management

9 Responses

  1. thanks, helped me personally a bunch

    if I were DD I’d send down the two Ls(ironic?) Larrish and Lyon

    After today’s start Bonderman can have Willis’ spot. Call me crazy but if we have Bondo ready I don’t have a whole lot of patience for him.

    We don’t have all this margin for error, and we can’t have a fifth starter getting shelled this often. I’m not for getting rid of him quite yet, but he just demoted himself to be a long reliever with his last few starts and last year imo.

    by David on Jun 4, 2009 at 10:07 pm

  2. Jeff Larish and Ryan Raburn have not spent 20 days in the minors yet this year, so they really haven’t used option years quite yet…

    by Eddie on Jun 4, 2009 at 11:04 pm

  3. very nicely explained–thanks!

    by Jen on Jun 4, 2009 at 11:12 pm

  4. thanks, time for some changes the two teams that absolutely eat the Tigers up are next and the current 25 aren’t exactly getting it done lately

    by jud on Jun 4, 2009 at 11:27 pm

  5. [...] does a bang-up job over at the Detroit Tigers Weblog of figuring out this whole “option thing” that needs to be considered and Jeremy [...]

    by The Spot Starters » 2009 Season » Random Thoughts on Jun 5, 2009 at 9:43 am

  6. Want him back?

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/.....rilli.html

    by Chris in Dallas on Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56 am

  7. We already have Miner, Nate, and Lyon… do we really need a four-headed gas tank in the bullpen?

    by T Smith on Jun 5, 2009 at 1:57 pm

  8. Jamie Walker is apparently set to be released too… Throw in Wil Ledezma and the band is back together.

    by Eddie on Jun 5, 2009 at 4:31 pm

  9. I know back-up catchers aren’t huge difference makers, but… It may be about time for the Sardinha experiment to end. Can we have another look at Dusty Ryan, please? I know he’s not exactly a lights-out hitter, but I think we could reasonably expect a 150 point increase over Sardinha’s average, with a fighting chance to hit one out now and then. Sardinha’s WAY below the Mendoza line.

    RYAN (Toledo) .244 / .365 / .435 / .800
    SARDINHA (Det.) .115 / .111 / .154 / .265

    YES, Ryan’s AAA OPS is .535 points better than Sardinha’s. The reason Sardinha’s on-base percentage is LOWER than his batting average is that he has one sac fly and ZERO walks this year.

    I know Ryan’s ideally better off developing for a while, but the needs of the big club — sitting in first place today — should be taken into account. With a long June road trip coming up, including a double-header, the second catcher might get a dozen or more plate appearances, and the difference between the two could be worth a handful of hits. Which, as this team has been hitting, could make a difference.

    by scotsw on Jun 8, 2009 at 9:12 am

« | »




Recent Posts


Pages



About The Detroit Tiger Weblog

About the Site Detroit Tigers Weblog was launched in July, 2001. At the time it was the only Tigers blog and it resided as a blogspot page. There were multiple authors and it mostly consisted of links to the rare times the Tigers were mentioned in the national media. We only had a few dozen […]more →

Switch to our desktop site