<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 2009.030: Tigers at Indians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117779</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117779</guid>
		<description>As we speak, there&#039;s speculation that Leyland gets extended.

http://detroitnews.com/article/20090512/OPINION03/905120364/1004/Jim-Leyland-deserves-contract-extension-for-2010

If there were to be a managerial change, I&#039;d imagine it would be someone DD is familiar with and who has managerial experience.  He seemed to be high on Walbeck, so he&#039;d probably be a top candidate.  If the Tigers end up winning the division, I don&#039;t foresee any sort of change, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we speak, there&#8217;s speculation that Leyland gets extended.</p>
<p><a href="http://detroitnews.com/article/20090512/OPINION03/905120364/1004/Jim-Leyland-deserves-contract-extension-for-2010" rel="nofollow">http://detroitnews.com/article.....n-for-2010</a></p>
<p>If there were to be a managerial change, I&#8217;d imagine it would be someone DD is familiar with and who has managerial experience.  He seemed to be high on Walbeck, so he&#8217;d probably be a top candidate.  If the Tigers end up winning the division, I don&#8217;t foresee any sort of change, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre in Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117777</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre in Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117777</guid>
		<description>David,

As always its a pleasure conversing with you. 

Since you view responsibility as subjective, I suppose I don&#039;t have to go to the trouble of explaining that: my point was that Mr. X (given the forum and his relative clout) wasn&#039;t being irresponsible. If you understand English, that means that you and I were less so. Baseball hardly needs Mr. X to cast a cloud of doubt over steroid use, it does that just fine on its own. Its also unlikely that anyone will be banned as a result of his insinuations. 

&quot;I for one understand that MLB is taking this seriously&quot;

Sure it did, after the roid-freaks helped save baseball post-lockout, it got real tough. 

&quot;If you’re going to say it was rampant and nearly everybody did it, you need to show me positive test results for 90% of MLB before I’d believe you.&quot;

Take a look at the nature of steroid use and testing, and couple it with the possibility that players may have been getting advanced notice of testing dates...it makes the above seem like a sub-optimal way of showing that the MLB is mostly steroid-free.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m not really endorsing Mr. X&#039;s comments. This has more to do with a person crusade to get you to tone it down. You don&#039;t need to ratchet everything up to 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>As always its a pleasure conversing with you. </p>
<p>Since you view responsibility as subjective, I suppose I don&#8217;t have to go to the trouble of explaining that: my point was that Mr. X (given the forum and his relative clout) wasn&#8217;t being irresponsible. If you understand English, that means that you and I were less so. Baseball hardly needs Mr. X to cast a cloud of doubt over steroid use, it does that just fine on its own. Its also unlikely that anyone will be banned as a result of his insinuations. </p>
<p>&#8220;I for one understand that MLB is taking this seriously&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure it did, after the roid-freaks helped save baseball post-lockout, it got real tough. </p>
<p>&#8220;If you’re going to say it was rampant and nearly everybody did it, you need to show me positive test results for 90% of MLB before I’d believe you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Take a look at the nature of steroid use and testing, and couple it with the possibility that players may have been getting advanced notice of testing dates&#8230;it makes the above seem like a sub-optimal way of showing that the MLB is mostly steroid-free.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not really endorsing Mr. X&#8217;s comments. This has more to do with a person crusade to get you to tone it down. You don&#8217;t need to ratchet everything up to 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117763</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117763</guid>
		<description>I agree that there is a fuzzy line on performance enhancement and medical advances, but let&#039;s clarify something on cortisone as a steroid. A steroid references the chemical structure of a substance, not the purpose for it.

The steroids on the banned list are anabolic steroids which exist for the express purpose of building skeletal muscle.

Cortisone, a class of drugs called corticosteroids, exist to work with the immune system and to reduce allergic reactions and swelling. That is why people don&#039;t make a big deal about cortisone. They are referring to anabolic steroids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is a fuzzy line on performance enhancement and medical advances, but let&#8217;s clarify something on cortisone as a steroid. A steroid references the chemical structure of a substance, not the purpose for it.</p>
<p>The steroids on the banned list are anabolic steroids which exist for the express purpose of building skeletal muscle.</p>
<p>Cortisone, a class of drugs called corticosteroids, exist to work with the immune system and to reduce allergic reactions and swelling. That is why people don&#8217;t make a big deal about cortisone. They are referring to anabolic steroids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117762</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117762</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a Mud Hen coach getting it. Durham has no managerial experience, nor does Sager. And the Tigers already had Parish as a manager and won&#039;t go back there beyond an interim assignment. Matt Walbeck and Tom Brookens would probably be leading candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a Mud Hen coach getting it. Durham has no managerial experience, nor does Sager. And the Tigers already had Parish as a manager and won&#8217;t go back there beyond an interim assignment. Matt Walbeck and Tom Brookens would probably be leading candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117761</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117761</guid>
		<description>As to the first part of your statement, the Mitchell report was hampered because he didn&#039;t have subpoena power. Nobody had to cooperate with him and he simply found the information where he could, which was limited.

Assuming every single team had a steroid dealer in place is a pretty weighty claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to the first part of your statement, the Mitchell report was hampered because he didn&#8217;t have subpoena power. Nobody had to cooperate with him and he simply found the information where he could, which was limited.</p>
<p>Assuming every single team had a steroid dealer in place is a pretty weighty claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117728</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117728</guid>
		<description>Also the Tribe won today 9-4.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the Tribe won today 9-4.  <img src='http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117724</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117724</guid>
		<description>OK let me put it really simple

1) I&#039;m NOT AGAINST ROIDS

2) I AM against crucifying everybody and his brother without providing any sources.

The burden of proof is on the accusers.  I for one understand that MLB is taking this seriously, whether I agree with it or not is another thing.  If you&#039;re going to say it was rampant and nearly everybody did it, you need to show me positive test results for 90% of MLB before I&#039;d believe you.  


What are the many irresponsible thing(s) I&#039;ve said?   Again please provide proof.  Plus irresponsible is a subjective term.

Also when this Big Mac/Sosa barrage went on I was a minor - so you couldn&#039;t &quot;point the finger at me&quot;.  

Plus whether I&#039;m a big fan of the long ball or not I know it is good for baseball revenue.  

It is funny how you mention HR derby.  Sadly like I have argued before, this game has been turned into a hr derby.  For better or for worse it puts butts in the seats, and that is what was(and is)  most important to any business, baseball being no different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK let me put it really simple</p>
<p>1) I&#8217;m NOT AGAINST ROIDS</p>
<p>2) I AM against crucifying everybody and his brother without providing any sources.</p>
<p>The burden of proof is on the accusers.  I for one understand that MLB is taking this seriously, whether I agree with it or not is another thing.  If you&#8217;re going to say it was rampant and nearly everybody did it, you need to show me positive test results for 90% of MLB before I&#8217;d believe you.  </p>
<p>What are the many irresponsible thing(s) I&#8217;ve said?   Again please provide proof.  Plus irresponsible is a subjective term.</p>
<p>Also when this Big Mac/Sosa barrage went on I was a minor &#8211; so you couldn&#8217;t &#8220;point the finger at me&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Plus whether I&#8217;m a big fan of the long ball or not I know it is good for baseball revenue.  </p>
<p>It is funny how you mention HR derby.  Sadly like I have argued before, this game has been turned into a hr derby.  For better or for worse it puts butts in the seats, and that is what was(and is)  most important to any business, baseball being no different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. X</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117681</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sad because the Mitchell Report only had a few witnesses.  It&#039;s also sad that only one player came forward and supported Mitchell (Frank Thomas).   Everyone else was either guilty and/or not man enough to help.  They all deserve blame because of that.

Heck, I&#039;d inject  myself with the swine flu for a  4 year / $20 million contract.  I&#039;m sure most people would do the same.  I wouldn&#039;t hide behind a union and keep it quiet though.  I&#039;d be man enough to come forward and rat everyone out who did it with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad because the Mitchell Report only had a few witnesses.  It&#8217;s also sad that only one player came forward and supported Mitchell (Frank Thomas).   Everyone else was either guilty and/or not man enough to help.  They all deserve blame because of that.</p>
<p>Heck, I&#8217;d inject  myself with the swine flu for a  4 year / $20 million contract.  I&#8217;m sure most people would do the same.  I wouldn&#8217;t hide behind a union and keep it quiet though.  I&#8217;d be man enough to come forward and rat everyone out who did it with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre in Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117658</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre in Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117658</guid>
		<description>David,

If the league and the players had only taken it as seriously as you are here, we wouldn&#039;t be having this conversation. 

I don&#039;t know if I agree with what Mr. X is saying, but its hardly more irresponsible than some of the things you or I have said. If the league had been serious about cracking down on steroids, we would never have had the home-run derbies that were the McGuire vs Sosa years. Its also telling that the home-run derby itself is a bigger spectacle than the All-Star Game. Collectively as fans, I think we all &quot;deserve&quot; some of the blame too...after all, we didn&#039;t really question the explosion of home runs or freakish, almost comical bodies that started cropping up in many (if not all) the MLB clubhouses. 

Innocent until proven guilty is a funny phrase in the era of perception = reality. It doesn&#039;t help that a run down of recent MVPs is littered with offenders. Maybe Mr. X was over generalizing, but people post some strange things here without fact-checking all the time, it doesn&#039;t mean we should freak out on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>If the league and the players had only taken it as seriously as you are here, we wouldn&#8217;t be having this conversation. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I agree with what Mr. X is saying, but its hardly more irresponsible than some of the things you or I have said. If the league had been serious about cracking down on steroids, we would never have had the home-run derbies that were the McGuire vs Sosa years. Its also telling that the home-run derby itself is a bigger spectacle than the All-Star Game. Collectively as fans, I think we all &#8220;deserve&#8221; some of the blame too&#8230;after all, we didn&#8217;t really question the explosion of home runs or freakish, almost comical bodies that started cropping up in many (if not all) the MLB clubhouses. </p>
<p>Innocent until proven guilty is a funny phrase in the era of perception = reality. It doesn&#8217;t help that a run down of recent MVPs is littered with offenders. Maybe Mr. X was over generalizing, but people post some strange things here without fact-checking all the time, it doesn&#8217;t mean we should freak out on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117648</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117648</guid>
		<description>It is hard to ever know for 100% certain that a player was 100% clean.  In the USA you&#039;re innocent until proven guilty.  

And I believe that many players were not taking banned supps.  Even IF there was one guy in every locker room distributing the stuff, it does NOT mean that all the stars were doing it.

And the majority of the public can&#039;t really say much, because they haven&#039;t played on an MLB or MiLB team.  

And if you don&#039;t care, like you claim, why would you assume one way or the other?  And why do you find it &quot;sad&quot; that there was a guy on every team distributing it, and yet you&#039;d &quot;do it too&quot;?

This is a serious matter, not to be taken lightly, considering players can be banned from baseball for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to ever know for 100% certain that a player was 100% clean.  In the USA you&#8217;re innocent until proven guilty.  </p>
<p>And I believe that many players were not taking banned supps.  Even IF there was one guy in every locker room distributing the stuff, it does NOT mean that all the stars were doing it.</p>
<p>And the majority of the public can&#8217;t really say much, because they haven&#8217;t played on an MLB or MiLB team.  </p>
<p>And if you don&#8217;t care, like you claim, why would you assume one way or the other?  And why do you find it &#8220;sad&#8221; that there was a guy on every team distributing it, and yet you&#8217;d &#8220;do it too&#8221;?</p>
<p>This is a serious matter, not to be taken lightly, considering players can be banned from baseball for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117644</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117644</guid>
		<description>Well I guess you got me there.   I still don&#039;t think it has a chance of happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess you got me there.   I still don&#8217;t think it has a chance of happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.  X</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.  X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117638</guid>
		<description>&quot;When in this day and age have you seen TWO managers in the same division get fired and one of them switch teams?&quot;

In 2006.  SD fired Bruce Bochy, then SF hired Bruce Bochy.

It&#039;s not too far fetched.  DD went after a NL rival before.  When Leyland got fired in Pittsburgh in 1996, DD hired him to manage the Marlins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When in this day and age have you seen TWO managers in the same division get fired and one of them switch teams?&#8221;</p>
<p>In 2006.  SD fired Bruce Bochy, then SF hired Bruce Bochy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not too far fetched.  DD went after a NL rival before.  When Leyland got fired in Pittsburgh in 1996, DD hired him to manage the Marlins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.  X</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.  X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117626</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just not naive.  Nearly every other player was guilty of taking PED&#039;s prior to 2006.  The Mitchell Report proved how deep it was only on a few clubs; he only went after the NY Radomski and McNamee connections.   The sad fact is that every single team had a trainer and/or player in the clubhouse that was covertly distributing PED&#039;s.  They most certainly did, but just didn&#039;t get caught.  

I have nothing against those Cleveland players I named. It&#039;s easy to figure out who did what if you just start at the top with the best players.  More than likely they took something at one time or another.   Do I really care if Tiger players like Polanco, Guillen, or Ordonez took PED&#039;s?  Not really.  I just assume that they did.  Inge probably took something too.  They all do it to get the long term contracts.  I&#039;d do it too if I could afford it and it would  make me rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just not naive.  Nearly every other player was guilty of taking PED&#8217;s prior to 2006.  The Mitchell Report proved how deep it was only on a few clubs; he only went after the NY Radomski and McNamee connections.   The sad fact is that every single team had a trainer and/or player in the clubhouse that was covertly distributing PED&#8217;s.  They most certainly did, but just didn&#8217;t get caught.  </p>
<p>I have nothing against those Cleveland players I named. It&#8217;s easy to figure out who did what if you just start at the top with the best players.  More than likely they took something at one time or another.   Do I really care if Tiger players like Polanco, Guillen, or Ordonez took PED&#8217;s?  Not really.  I just assume that they did.  Inge probably took something too.  They all do it to get the long term contracts.  I&#8217;d do it too if I could afford it and it would  make me rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117599</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117599</guid>
		<description>Dombo is still going to be the GM either way.

If Leyland gets fired (and that won&#039;t happen if they play at this winning%) or should I say - not renewed,  I highly HIGHLY doubt they&#039;d hire Wedge.

Their would be a much better chance of a former Dombro friend or heck even a Mudhen guy getting the call.  Ie Parrish or Leon or Sager.

When in this day and age have you seen TWO managers in the same division get fired and one of them switch teams?

Its about as crazy as saying Cabby will be wearing Chief Wahoo on his sleeve next season.  Ain&#039;t gunna happen, ya heard it hur first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dombo is still going to be the GM either way.</p>
<p>If Leyland gets fired (and that won&#8217;t happen if they play at this winning%) or should I say &#8211; not renewed,  I highly HIGHLY doubt they&#8217;d hire Wedge.</p>
<p>Their would be a much better chance of a former Dombro friend or heck even a Mudhen guy getting the call.  Ie Parrish or Leon or Sager.</p>
<p>When in this day and age have you seen TWO managers in the same division get fired and one of them switch teams?</p>
<p>Its about as crazy as saying Cabby will be wearing Chief Wahoo on his sleeve next season.  Ain&#8217;t gunna happen, ya heard it hur first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117595</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/game-2009030-tigers-at-indians/#comment-117595</guid>
		<description>@ Mr. X

This is absurd.  Do you even read what you write?

1) Innocent until proven guilty - don&#039;t start making accusations.  
2) His power has gone down since 2006???? He only played one full year after that.
3) He is done?  He has a 133 OPS+ for 2009.

As far as the Tigers taking banned substances again refer to #1.  Who else is gone besides Pudge and Sheff?  And how do you KNOW that Pudge did it?  

I&#039;m shocked YOU didn&#039;t harp on Ordonez and his dip in performance as evidence that he has been using, considering he was named in Canseco&#039;s book.  Or that Guillen or Bonderman had been.   

There are things called aging, getting injured and dips in performance when both occur, or even when they don&#039;t.  To blanket everybody under that cloud is downright foolish.

Minirant - 

And personally I have nothing against people who juice or take HGH.  If they are experts (or can pay for expert advise) to use what they are using - let them.

A cortisone shot is a steroid - nobody calls foul on that.  Or for example - What about getting laser eye surgery?  That isn&#039;t performance enhancing?  It sure as $ isn&#039;t natural.  

These people who spread propaganda hate against the stuff usually have no understanding of it at all.  Many fear what they don&#039;t understand.  


Anyways, again don&#039;t spew accusations that you aren&#039;t sure about.   In my eyes saying that everybody and his brother was using or even certain players were using without any sources or proof besides your own inclinations push your credibility into the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mr. X</p>
<p>This is absurd.  Do you even read what you write?</p>
<p>1) Innocent until proven guilty &#8211; don&#8217;t start making accusations.<br />
2) His power has gone down since 2006???? He only played one full year after that.<br />
3) He is done?  He has a 133 OPS+ for 2009.</p>
<p>As far as the Tigers taking banned substances again refer to #1.  Who else is gone besides Pudge and Sheff?  And how do you KNOW that Pudge did it?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked YOU didn&#8217;t harp on Ordonez and his dip in performance as evidence that he has been using, considering he was named in Canseco&#8217;s book.  Or that Guillen or Bonderman had been.   </p>
<p>There are things called aging, getting injured and dips in performance when both occur, or even when they don&#8217;t.  To blanket everybody under that cloud is downright foolish.</p>
<p>Minirant &#8211; </p>
<p>And personally I have nothing against people who juice or take HGH.  If they are experts (or can pay for expert advise) to use what they are using &#8211; let them.</p>
<p>A cortisone shot is a steroid &#8211; nobody calls foul on that.  Or for example &#8211; What about getting laser eye surgery?  That isn&#8217;t performance enhancing?  It sure as $ isn&#8217;t natural.  </p>
<p>These people who spread propaganda hate against the stuff usually have no understanding of it at all.  Many fear what they don&#8217;t understand.  </p>
<p>Anyways, again don&#8217;t spew accusations that you aren&#8217;t sure about.   In my eyes saying that everybody and his brother was using or even certain players were using without any sources or proof besides your own inclinations push your credibility into the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

