<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edwin Jackson&#8217;s 132 pitches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:22:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bunt Singles: May 23 &#187; Mack Avenue Tigers : A Detroit Tigers Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118928</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunt Singles: May 23 &#187; Mack Avenue Tigers : A Detroit Tigers Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118928</guid>
		<description>[...] Like me, Billfer didn&#8217;t object to Jackson throwing 132 pitches so much a couple days ago, as he objected to Jackson staying in the game long enough to give up the lead in the eighth inning. (Detroit Tigers Weblog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like me, Billfer didn&#8217;t object to Jackson throwing 132 pitches so much a couple days ago, as he objected to Jackson staying in the game long enough to give up the lead in the eighth inning. (Detroit Tigers Weblog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118839</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118839</guid>
		<description>&quot;Does he really have so little confidence in his bullpen?

Simply?  Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does he really have so little confidence in his bullpen?</p>
<p>Simply?  Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118838</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118838</guid>
		<description>On the contrary.  I think there&#039;s plenty of insight in both those quotes.   I understand Billfer&#039;s POV and the analysis is excellent.  But I so happen to completely disaggree with it.  For once I&#039;m actually happy with Jim Leyland for making a gutsy call.   This team is fired up.   Baseball shouldn&#039;t be so &quot;clinical&quot; -- imo.   Ten or twenty extra pithes isn&#039;t going to kill EJ&#039;s arm.   Putting some &quot;heart&quot; back into the game can&#039;t be a bad thing for the game, and for this team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary.  I think there&#8217;s plenty of insight in both those quotes.   I understand Billfer&#8217;s POV and the analysis is excellent.  But I so happen to completely disaggree with it.  For once I&#8217;m actually happy with Jim Leyland for making a gutsy call.   This team is fired up.   Baseball shouldn&#8217;t be so &#8220;clinical&#8221; &#8212; imo.   Ten or twenty extra pithes isn&#8217;t going to kill EJ&#8217;s arm.   Putting some &#8220;heart&#8221; back into the game can&#8217;t be a bad thing for the game, and for this team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118834</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118834</guid>
		<description>I would have been perfectly fine with Perry pitching in the eighth too. I know Leyland wants to &quot;stretch him out&quot; and have him in lower pressure situations, but it&#039;s not like Perry hasn&#039;t pitched in the eighth in a tight game before and survived to tell about it.

Far as Jackson goes, I was fine with him going out to the mound in the eighth to see what happens. But when he was struggling with his location, walking batters and giving up some hard-hit balls, I think the responsible thing is to pull him. Maybe there&#039;s some Jim Leyland-psychology going on and it really works in the long haul. I hope so. Otherwise, the move made absolutely no sense, regardless of pitch count. 

So count me as in agreement with Bill on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have been perfectly fine with Perry pitching in the eighth too. I know Leyland wants to &#8220;stretch him out&#8221; and have him in lower pressure situations, but it&#8217;s not like Perry hasn&#8217;t pitched in the eighth in a tight game before and survived to tell about it.</p>
<p>Far as Jackson goes, I was fine with him going out to the mound in the eighth to see what happens. But when he was struggling with his location, walking batters and giving up some hard-hit balls, I think the responsible thing is to pull him. Maybe there&#8217;s some Jim Leyland-psychology going on and it really works in the long haul. I hope so. Otherwise, the move made absolutely no sense, regardless of pitch count. </p>
<p>So count me as in agreement with Bill on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118833</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118833</guid>
		<description>I would&#039;ve been perfectly fine with Perry pitching to &lt;i&gt;start&lt;/i&gt; the 8th.  Once EJax let the leadoff batter on base, though, I guess it was kinda &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; inning.  Perry walks too many guys right now to be trusted to come in with baserunners.  If Lyon never throws another pitch wearing a Tigers uniform, I wouldn&#039;t be sad.  Miner was available, though...he maybe could&#039;ve been used to try and get a ground ball/double play after Jackson issued the leadoff walk.  But whatever.  They won, and life is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would&#8217;ve been perfectly fine with Perry pitching to <i>start</i> the 8th.  Once EJax let the leadoff batter on base, though, I guess it was kinda <i>his</i> inning.  Perry walks too many guys right now to be trusted to come in with baserunners.  If Lyon never throws another pitch wearing a Tigers uniform, I wouldn&#8217;t be sad.  Miner was available, though&#8230;he maybe could&#8217;ve been used to try and get a ground ball/double play after Jackson issued the leadoff walk.  But whatever.  They won, and life is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118832</guid>
		<description>I think the real problem is the bullpen.  There are only three guys (Rodney, Zumaya, Seay) who you can legitimately throw into a high leverage situation.  I wholly disagree with letting Jackson have more than one batter in the eighth, but worrying about the overuse of those three is pretty legit.  Either Perry or Lyon has to be the fourth guy.  If they can&#039;t, they need to be off the roster.  If neither of them steps up, you almost have to look at guys like Fien, Ni, French, and Dolsi and see what you can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real problem is the bullpen.  There are only three guys (Rodney, Zumaya, Seay) who you can legitimately throw into a high leverage situation.  I wholly disagree with letting Jackson have more than one batter in the eighth, but worrying about the overuse of those three is pretty legit.  Either Perry or Lyon has to be the fourth guy.  If they can&#8217;t, they need to be off the roster.  If neither of them steps up, you almost have to look at guys like Fien, Ni, French, and Dolsi and see what you can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118824</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118824</guid>
		<description>When Grady Little came out of the dugout after the Davis walk, I figured EJax was getting the hook.  I was releived.  Then when Grady Little walked back to the dugout and Jackson was still in the game, I was mortified.  When the game was 3-3 shortly thereafter, I was furious.  Fortunately, the game ended well.  Unfortunately, these excessively high pitch counts will take their toll.  Maybe this is why the Tigers have struggled in August/September under Grady Little?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Grady Little came out of the dugout after the Davis walk, I figured EJax was getting the hook.  I was releived.  Then when Grady Little walked back to the dugout and Jackson was still in the game, I was mortified.  When the game was 3-3 shortly thereafter, I was furious.  Fortunately, the game ended well.  Unfortunately, these excessively high pitch counts will take their toll.  Maybe this is why the Tigers have struggled in August/September under Grady Little?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briggs45</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118819</link>
		<dc:creator>briggs45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118819</guid>
		<description>Mike R- &quot;I think is was in Chicago against the Pale Hose...&quot;

Has anyone else noticed the MLB Network&#039;s overruse of monikers such as  &quot;Pale Hose&quot;, &quot;Fightin&#039; Phils&quot; and &quot;bump&quot;? It&#039;s almost as annoying as the Von Bondies song they played throughout  their &quot;30 Clubs in 30 Days&quot; programing.  

What&#039;s next?  Motor City Kitties?  Actually, I wouldn&#039;t mind that one.  

Lastly, it&#039;s good to see Matt Dillon getting some work on their network.  Whoops, that&#039;s Greg Amsinger.  

Great posts gents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike R- &#8220;I think is was in Chicago against the Pale Hose&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Has anyone else noticed the MLB Network&#8217;s overruse of monikers such as  &#8220;Pale Hose&#8221;, &#8220;Fightin&#8217; Phils&#8221; and &#8220;bump&#8221;? It&#8217;s almost as annoying as the Von Bondies song they played throughout  their &#8220;30 Clubs in 30 Days&#8221; programing.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s next?  Motor City Kitties?  Actually, I wouldn&#8217;t mind that one.  </p>
<p>Lastly, it&#8217;s good to see Matt Dillon getting some work on their network.  Whoops, that&#8217;s Greg Amsinger.  </p>
<p>Great posts gents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tbone</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118818</link>
		<dc:creator>Tbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118818</guid>
		<description>I disagreed with JL&#039;s decision to bring EJ out for the 8th, but I don&#039;t buy the theory that leaving him in there is in any way related to his contract status. I just think he felt EJ was his best option for the 8th and once the snowball started rolling downhill, he couldn&#039;t stop it.

The Rangers had two good looks at Zumaya and Rodney in the first two games and knocked ZuZu around a bit the night before. So he was not going to be an option. But surely some combination of Perry/Seay/Miner/Robertson was going to be as good if not better than a gassed Jackson. After that opening walk, was there any question left? Does he really have so little confidence in his bullpen? It just didn&#039;t make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagreed with JL&#8217;s decision to bring EJ out for the 8th, but I don&#8217;t buy the theory that leaving him in there is in any way related to his contract status. I just think he felt EJ was his best option for the 8th and once the snowball started rolling downhill, he couldn&#8217;t stop it.</p>
<p>The Rangers had two good looks at Zumaya and Rodney in the first two games and knocked ZuZu around a bit the night before. So he was not going to be an option. But surely some combination of Perry/Seay/Miner/Robertson was going to be as good if not better than a gassed Jackson. After that opening walk, was there any question left? Does he really have so little confidence in his bullpen? It just didn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick S</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118817</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118817</guid>
		<description>&quot;What I’d like to see is Jackson bumped back a day, and put Porcello or Willis between him and Verlander, so that if the pen has to work hard on one day, they have a reasonable shot at only having to pitch an inning or two the next day.&quot;

This is exactly what i&#039;ve been thinking as well.  Move your two best starters apart one day so you don&#039;t have to worry about using your bull pen heavily for 3 straight days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What I’d like to see is Jackson bumped back a day, and put Porcello or Willis between him and Verlander, so that if the pen has to work hard on one day, they have a reasonable shot at only having to pitch an inning or two the next day.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is exactly what i&#8217;ve been thinking as well.  Move your two best starters apart one day so you don&#8217;t have to worry about using your bull pen heavily for 3 straight days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre in Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118815</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre in Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118815</guid>
		<description>David,

&quot;Complaining when we have a solid 1 run win is complaining for complaining sake and just overkill IMO.&quot;

Of all people to disparage overkill...

The only thing that I agree with in your post is conditional: if this outing has &quot;conditioned&quot; him for extra stress, great. If on the other hand his next start is miserable, we&#039;ll have some retrospective grumbling on our hands.  

&quot;This was HIS GAME. I don’t understand why there can be so much complaining when we won. &quot;

I usually like to give Leyland the benefit of the doubt (having no baseball experience outside of fanhood), but sometimes the real story is how you win. This outing wasn&#039;t encouraging in that dept, and I would guess that if you were to repeat the scenario in a simulation, the outcome would not favor the Tigers most of the time. 

Jackson certainly did the best with what was asked of him, so its not entirely fair to say that he doesn&#039;t deserve the win, but leaving him in for the 8th clearly did more to jeopardize his chances of winning. What would a loss have done to his confidence? If he doesn&#039;t pitch the 8th, does he feel like his manager has any less confidence in him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>&#8220;Complaining when we have a solid 1 run win is complaining for complaining sake and just overkill IMO.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of all people to disparage overkill&#8230;</p>
<p>The only thing that I agree with in your post is conditional: if this outing has &#8220;conditioned&#8221; him for extra stress, great. If on the other hand his next start is miserable, we&#8217;ll have some retrospective grumbling on our hands.  </p>
<p>&#8220;This was HIS GAME. I don’t understand why there can be so much complaining when we won. &#8221;</p>
<p>I usually like to give Leyland the benefit of the doubt (having no baseball experience outside of fanhood), but sometimes the real story is how you win. This outing wasn&#8217;t encouraging in that dept, and I would guess that if you were to repeat the scenario in a simulation, the outcome would not favor the Tigers most of the time. </p>
<p>Jackson certainly did the best with what was asked of him, so its not entirely fair to say that he doesn&#8217;t deserve the win, but leaving him in for the 8th clearly did more to jeopardize his chances of winning. What would a loss have done to his confidence? If he doesn&#8217;t pitch the 8th, does he feel like his manager has any less confidence in him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birdy</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118814</link>
		<dc:creator>Birdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118814</guid>
		<description>I wondered why he was leaving him in, but I liked it.  It fired me up.  It fired me up so much that I posted for the first time in a long time, right after the top of the eighth.  I got fired up because I believed the Tigers got fired up by it.  Check what I said in my post.  Billfer, do you think it&#039;s possible that the Tigers got fired up by it?  And if they did, would that then be an acceptable reason for leaving him in?

I&#039;m not suggesting that the decision was directly resonsible for them scoring the go ahead run, but I think it was a decision that made the players feel just a little better about playing for this team and this manager, something quite important over the 162 game long haul.

Maybe I&#039;m completely wrong.  Maybe they all thought he should have gotten yanked.  I didn&#039;t get that sense though, although I realize it wouldn&#039;t make much sense for a player to question the decision by word or deed.

I&#039;ve only seen quotes from two players, but I&#039;m wondering if there are any ex-players or others not connected to the team, that could give us some insight.  I wonder what Rod Allen would have said.

Jackson said, “It would have been easy to go to the &#039;pen and pull me out.  But to leave me out there definitely shows that he has confidence in me&quot; and &quot;It would&#039;ve been easy to go to the &#039;pen, but I&#039;m glad he had that confidence. It rubs off on a pitcher.&quot;

Inge said, “&quot;If you leave it to a guy who really wants to compete, he doesn&#039;t care what his pitch count is.  He wants to go out there and try to be able to help his team win.&quot;

Not much insight.  Maybe the fact that there aren&#039;t more quotes supports the theory that I&#039;m completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered why he was leaving him in, but I liked it.  It fired me up.  It fired me up so much that I posted for the first time in a long time, right after the top of the eighth.  I got fired up because I believed the Tigers got fired up by it.  Check what I said in my post.  Billfer, do you think it&#8217;s possible that the Tigers got fired up by it?  And if they did, would that then be an acceptable reason for leaving him in?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting that the decision was directly resonsible for them scoring the go ahead run, but I think it was a decision that made the players feel just a little better about playing for this team and this manager, something quite important over the 162 game long haul.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m completely wrong.  Maybe they all thought he should have gotten yanked.  I didn&#8217;t get that sense though, although I realize it wouldn&#8217;t make much sense for a player to question the decision by word or deed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only seen quotes from two players, but I&#8217;m wondering if there are any ex-players or others not connected to the team, that could give us some insight.  I wonder what Rod Allen would have said.</p>
<p>Jackson said, “It would have been easy to go to the &#8216;pen and pull me out.  But to leave me out there definitely shows that he has confidence in me&#8221; and &#8220;It would&#8217;ve been easy to go to the &#8216;pen, but I&#8217;m glad he had that confidence. It rubs off on a pitcher.&#8221;</p>
<p>Inge said, “&#8221;If you leave it to a guy who really wants to compete, he doesn&#8217;t care what his pitch count is.  He wants to go out there and try to be able to help his team win.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not much insight.  Maybe the fact that there aren&#8217;t more quotes supports the theory that I&#8217;m completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118812</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118812</guid>
		<description>Once in a while you have to look past the pitch count and see the bigger picture. Leyland gambled and left Jackson in the game when conventional wisdom would dictate his removal. He gambled and got away with it as the Tigers went ahead in the bottom of the inning. To read Jacksons comments about his manager showing confidence in him suggests the risk had the desired effect.

If this trend becomes a regular occurrence then, definitely, it&#039;s pitcher abuse. However, baseball is the biggest head game in sports and it all revolves around confidence and Leyland understands that. Sometimes he manages with his intuition instead of his laptop and I see that as a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once in a while you have to look past the pitch count and see the bigger picture. Leyland gambled and left Jackson in the game when conventional wisdom would dictate his removal. He gambled and got away with it as the Tigers went ahead in the bottom of the inning. To read Jacksons comments about his manager showing confidence in him suggests the risk had the desired effect.</p>
<p>If this trend becomes a regular occurrence then, definitely, it&#8217;s pitcher abuse. However, baseball is the biggest head game in sports and it all revolves around confidence and Leyland understands that. Sometimes he manages with his intuition instead of his laptop and I see that as a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118810</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118810</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you say here Mike. It&#039;s easy to second guess when the team loses. As for Jackson&#039;s effectiveness in the 8th? He blew the lead. The offense bailed him out the next inning. What the offense did in the 8th shouldn&#039;t validated Leyland&#039;s decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you say here Mike. It&#8217;s easy to second guess when the team loses. As for Jackson&#8217;s effectiveness in the 8th? He blew the lead. The offense bailed him out the next inning. What the offense did in the 8th shouldn&#8217;t validated Leyland&#8217;s decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/05/edwin-jacksons-132-pitches/#comment-118807</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=4298#comment-118807</guid>
		<description>Jackson was getting rocked in the 8th. And while I understand getting the win makes it easy to forget about the terrible decision (again, in my opinion. I&#039;m cool with anyone that would like to disagree), I don&#039;t think in that way. For me, the ends don&#039;t justify the means. If he made brilliant moves with the pitching today and we lost 4-3, I&#039;d be complimenting him as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackson was getting rocked in the 8th. And while I understand getting the win makes it easy to forget about the terrible decision (again, in my opinion. I&#8217;m cool with anyone that would like to disagree), I don&#8217;t think in that way. For me, the ends don&#8217;t justify the means. If he made brilliant moves with the pitching today and we lost 4-3, I&#8217;d be complimenting him as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
