<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 2009.009: White Sox at Tigers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114419</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114419</guid>
		<description>Why would you be excited about missing Danks?  Granted he IS a good young pitcher, but... He has a 6.75 ERA at CoPa, is a lefty

Cabby is 3 for 10 against him, Ordonez is 10 for 17 (with 3 doubles and a hr), Laird is 2 for 3 (with a double), Guillen is 4 for 9 (with a double) and Inge is 4 for 10 (with a hr).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you be excited about missing Danks?  Granted he IS a good young pitcher, but&#8230; He has a 6.75 ERA at CoPa, is a lefty</p>
<p>Cabby is 3 for 10 against him, Ordonez is 10 for 17 (with 3 doubles and a hr), Laird is 2 for 3 (with a double), Guillen is 4 for 9 (with a double) and Inge is 4 for 10 (with a hr).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114417</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, the Tribe are losing again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, the Tribe are losing again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken in Vegas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken in Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114413</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m more relieved about missing Danks than any of the stuff concerning our rotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m more relieved about missing Danks than any of the stuff concerning our rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chauncey</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114411</link>
		<dc:creator>Chauncey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114411</guid>
		<description>One good thing about this rainout is that it looks like it gives the Tiger&#039;s a chance to reset their rotation, meaning that Miner won&#039;t get another start before late next week.  It also possibly means that the Tigers will avoid Danks in this series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One good thing about this rainout is that it looks like it gives the Tiger&#8217;s a chance to reset their rotation, meaning that Miner won&#8217;t get another start before late next week.  It also possibly means that the Tigers will avoid Danks in this series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick G</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114409</guid>
		<description>Looks like the only common open days for both teams are April 30th and June 15th, but the June date would be in the midst of interleague play.  Other than that they would have to play a doubleheader when the Sox are here July 24-26 or Oct 2-4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the only common open days for both teams are April 30th and June 15th, but the June date would be in the midst of interleague play.  Other than that they would have to play a doubleheader when the Sox are here July 24-26 or Oct 2-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave T.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114407</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114407</guid>
		<description>I doubt there will be a double header tomorrow.  They will get a better box office draw after Memorial day anyway.  Most likely they skip Porcello.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt there will be a double header tomorrow.  They will get a better box office draw after Memorial day anyway.  Most likely they skip Porcello.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114405</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114405</guid>
		<description>Chris: I&#039;d imagine a DH tomorrow since the Tigers have Friday off. Depends on CWS schedule though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: I&#8217;d imagine a DH tomorrow since the Tigers have Friday off. Depends on CWS schedule though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114404</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114404</guid>
		<description>MLB has it as PPD now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MLB has it as PPD now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114403</guid>
		<description>Looks like it&#039;s been officially called off.  No word on how the makeup will work.  They play the Sox a billion times, so I imagine it will be later in the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it&#8217;s been officially called off.  No word on how the makeup will work.  They play the Sox a billion times, so I imagine it will be later in the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tbone</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114402</guid>
		<description>Rain Delay, sounds like they are going to try and squeeze it in between the bands of showers. Here&#039;s the lineup, IF they play:

Granderson, CF
Polanco, 2B
Ordonez, RF
Cabrera, 1B
Guillen, DH
Thames, LF
Laird, C
Inge, 3B
Everett, SS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rain Delay, sounds like they are going to try and squeeze it in between the bands of showers. Here&#8217;s the lineup, IF they play:</p>
<p>Granderson, CF<br />
Polanco, 2B<br />
Ordonez, RF<br />
Cabrera, 1B<br />
Guillen, DH<br />
Thames, LF<br />
Laird, C<br />
Inge, 3B<br />
Everett, SS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave T.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114395</guid>
		<description>If they don&#039;t play would they just skip Porcello?
Not the worst thing in the world in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they don&#8217;t play would they just skip Porcello?<br />
Not the worst thing in the world in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114394</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/game-2009009-white-sox-at-tigers/#comment-114394</guid>
		<description>Fitting weather for Detroit after hearing the news yesterday. Go Tigers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitting weather for Detroit after hearing the news yesterday. Go Tigers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

