<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About that Cabrera &#8220;rumor&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilitch: We’re going to do whatever we’ve got to do</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-121179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilitch: We’re going to do whatever we’ve got to do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-121179</guid>
		<description>[...] has been quite a bit of speculation that the Tigers would have a fire sale this summer, including trading off Miguel Cabrera. But Mike Ilitch seemed to paint a different picture in a conversation with Drew Sharp: “We’re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been quite a bit of speculation that the Tigers would have a fire sale this summer, including trading off Miguel Cabrera. But Mike Ilitch seemed to paint a different picture in a conversation with Drew Sharp: “We’re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilitch: We&#8217;re going to do whatever we&#8217;ve got to do</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-121176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilitch: We&#8217;re going to do whatever we&#8217;ve got to do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-121176</guid>
		<description>[...] has been quite a bit of speculation that the Tigers would have a fire sale this summer, including trading off Miguel Cabrera. But Mike Ilitch seemed to paint a different picture in a conversation with Drew Sharp: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been quite a bit of speculation that the Tigers would have a fire sale this summer, including trading off Miguel Cabrera. But Mike Ilitch seemed to paint a different picture in a conversation with Drew Sharp: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-119003</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-119003</guid>
		<description>u are all crazy if u think the tigers will dumpcabbie i add mitt they do some dumb things but i dont think that will be one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u are all crazy if u think the tigers will dumpcabbie i add mitt they do some dumb things but i dont think that will be one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Mulder, Pedro, Cabrera, Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115507</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Mulder, Pedro, Cabrera, Holliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115507</guid>
		<description>[...] The Detroit Tigers Weblog addresses the recent rumors that the Tigers will look to trade Miguel Cabrera. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Detroit Tigers Weblog addresses the recent rumors that the Tigers will look to trade Miguel Cabrera. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115122</guid>
		<description>Chauncey, in regards to the Red Sox, I don&#039;t think you have a clue what you&#039;re talking about.  Saying Ortiz was a product of hitting in front of Manny is ridiculous.  The reason he&#039;s not hitting anymore is because of injuries, pure and simple.  He&#039;s still getting pitches to hit, he&#039;s simply not hitting them like he used to.

To say that the middle of the lineup &quot;has no pop whatsover&quot; is pretty dumb too.  Youkilis hits cleanup and is tearing the cover off the ball.

And finally, a &quot;suspect rotation&quot;?  Seriously?  A rotation of Beckett, Lester and Dice-K?  With the potential emergence of Masterson and/or Bucholtz?  I wish the Tigers could have such a suspect rotation!

You can hate the Red Sox, that&#039;s fine.  But you have no credibility when you spout such a load of nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chauncey, in regards to the Red Sox, I don&#8217;t think you have a clue what you&#8217;re talking about.  Saying Ortiz was a product of hitting in front of Manny is ridiculous.  The reason he&#8217;s not hitting anymore is because of injuries, pure and simple.  He&#8217;s still getting pitches to hit, he&#8217;s simply not hitting them like he used to.</p>
<p>To say that the middle of the lineup &#8220;has no pop whatsover&#8221; is pretty dumb too.  Youkilis hits cleanup and is tearing the cover off the ball.</p>
<p>And finally, a &#8220;suspect rotation&#8221;?  Seriously?  A rotation of Beckett, Lester and Dice-K?  With the potential emergence of Masterson and/or Bucholtz?  I wish the Tigers could have such a suspect rotation!</p>
<p>You can hate the Red Sox, that&#8217;s fine.  But you have no credibility when you spout such a load of nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115088</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115088</guid>
		<description>The Cabrera trade rumors are just that.  Logically it makes no sense to trade him due to &quot;the economy&quot;.  The economy is bad for everyone, so what team is going to want to take on that contract.  The Tigers would likely have to pay a substantial portion of it which isn&#039;t exactly a smart move.  After this season some cash is coming off of the books anyway, with Sheffield&#039;s deal finally expired.  If I&#039;m not mistaken, Polanco will also become a free agent.  That&#039;s close to $20 million in salary.  In the unlikely event that the Tigers are out of it at the deadline and become sellers, the most likely candidate to get moved is Ordonez.  If Inge is still maintaining his early season productivity (unlikely), they might actually find a taker on him too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cabrera trade rumors are just that.  Logically it makes no sense to trade him due to &#8220;the economy&#8221;.  The economy is bad for everyone, so what team is going to want to take on that contract.  The Tigers would likely have to pay a substantial portion of it which isn&#8217;t exactly a smart move.  After this season some cash is coming off of the books anyway, with Sheffield&#8217;s deal finally expired.  If I&#8217;m not mistaken, Polanco will also become a free agent.  That&#8217;s close to $20 million in salary.  In the unlikely event that the Tigers are out of it at the deadline and become sellers, the most likely candidate to get moved is Ordonez.  If Inge is still maintaining his early season productivity (unlikely), they might actually find a taker on him too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115087</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115087</guid>
		<description>Chauncy yes yes and YES.  I&#039;d add the Dodgers to that list.

I think the Yankees are going to be very strong this year and get on a tear when Arod returns.  And CC/Wang/Tex can&#039;t suck forever, and Joba is a good pitcher.  The funniest thing is the Yankees&#039; fans &lt;b&gt;AT LEAST KNOW&lt;/b&gt; that they are strong and have a large payroll.  That is better than the JUST AS ANNOYING Boston fans, or Mets fans or Cub fans.  They feel that they aren&#039;t the Yanks, but they basically are, except w/o the WS rings.  That sense of entitlement is annoying as heck.  

WHERE ARE THE PUJOLS TRADE RUMORS?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chauncy yes yes and YES.  I&#8217;d add the Dodgers to that list.</p>
<p>I think the Yankees are going to be very strong this year and get on a tear when Arod returns.  And CC/Wang/Tex can&#8217;t suck forever, and Joba is a good pitcher.  The funniest thing is the Yankees&#8217; fans <b>AT LEAST KNOW</b> that they are strong and have a large payroll.  That is better than the JUST AS ANNOYING Boston fans, or Mets fans or Cub fans.  They feel that they aren&#8217;t the Yanks, but they basically are, except w/o the WS rings.  That sense of entitlement is annoying as heck.  </p>
<p>WHERE ARE THE PUJOLS TRADE RUMORS?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chauncey</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115082</link>
		<dc:creator>Chauncey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115082</guid>
		<description>These rumors about Cabrera started almost immediately after he was traded to the Tigers- first it was how could they possibly afford to sign him, and now its how can they possibly afford to keep him.  I get the feeling that according to the national media, there are really only 3 teams out there that should have that type of player on their team- the Yankees, Red Sox and Mets.  Every other team according to the media, except for maybe the Cubs, should in no way be able to afford a player of Cabrera&#039;s caliber.  It gets tiring to hear after a while.

Everyone above is right also- you get the Boston homers that work for ESPN going into panick mode because they see that Ortiz was mostly a product of hitting in front of Manny, and they now see that the middle of that lineup has no pop whatsoever, which leaves the Red Sox hopes pegged to a suspect rotation that already has major injury concerns early in the year.  My eternal hope for this year, other than the Tigers winning the Central, is for either the Blue Jays or Rays to win that division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These rumors about Cabrera started almost immediately after he was traded to the Tigers- first it was how could they possibly afford to sign him, and now its how can they possibly afford to keep him.  I get the feeling that according to the national media, there are really only 3 teams out there that should have that type of player on their team- the Yankees, Red Sox and Mets.  Every other team according to the media, except for maybe the Cubs, should in no way be able to afford a player of Cabrera&#8217;s caliber.  It gets tiring to hear after a while.</p>
<p>Everyone above is right also- you get the Boston homers that work for ESPN going into panick mode because they see that Ortiz was mostly a product of hitting in front of Manny, and they now see that the middle of that lineup has no pop whatsoever, which leaves the Red Sox hopes pegged to a suspect rotation that already has major injury concerns early in the year.  My eternal hope for this year, other than the Tigers winning the Central, is for either the Blue Jays or Rays to win that division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115079</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115079</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s start a rumor that the disappointing Red Sox (3rd place?) are going to have to dump Beckett&#039;s salary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s start a rumor that the disappointing Red Sox (3rd place?) are going to have to dump Beckett&#8217;s salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115072</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115072</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; I do think though that this is a tired and true truth 

IF we don&#039;t win
Then our team-salary will drop

Season ticket sales have dropped dramatically from last year.   If income drops so must expenditure, or at least that should work in theory ;) &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> I do think though that this is a tired and true truth </p>
<p>IF we don&#8217;t win<br />
Then our team-salary will drop</p>
<p>Season ticket sales have dropped dramatically from last year.   If income drops so must expenditure, or at least that should work in theory <img src='http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115071</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115071</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Oh yea and this isn&#039;t happening. &lt;/b&gt;   I mean theoretically it could if we lost maybe 100+ games for several seasons running.  Or if Tigers could fly...

Usually the prevailing thought is you don&#039;t trade 26 year old hitting studs who might very well be a Hall resident in 25 years.

Guy has a similarity score to Junior, Pujols, Mantle, Aaron, Cepeda, Kaline, Frank Robinson.  These guys aren&#039;t Cobb ;), but they don&#039;t fall off trees either.  The only other way he could possibly, but not probably,  be dealt by DD and co. is if Boston or NY (Yanks or Mets) offered the Tigers something better that they couldn&#039;t refuse - ie Ryan Braun AND Zack Greinke AND Jake Peavy... Problem is I don&#039;t see that happening either.  Some team would have to have crazy pitching depth AND be stupid to do that.  In sum, refer back to my first sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Oh yea and this isn&#8217;t happening. </b>   I mean theoretically it could if we lost maybe 100+ games for several seasons running.  Or if Tigers could fly&#8230;</p>
<p>Usually the prevailing thought is you don&#8217;t trade 26 year old hitting studs who might very well be a Hall resident in 25 years.</p>
<p>Guy has a similarity score to Junior, Pujols, Mantle, Aaron, Cepeda, Kaline, Frank Robinson.  These guys aren&#8217;t Cobb <img src='http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> , but they don&#8217;t fall off trees either.  The only other way he could possibly, but not probably,  be dealt by DD and co. is if Boston or NY (Yanks or Mets) offered the Tigers something better that they couldn&#8217;t refuse &#8211; ie Ryan Braun AND Zack Greinke AND Jake Peavy&#8230; Problem is I don&#8217;t see that happening either.  Some team would have to have crazy pitching depth AND be stupid to do that.  In sum, refer back to my first sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115070</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115070</guid>
		<description>Hey Zack,

Did you used to live on Strathdale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Zack,</p>
<p>Did you used to live on Strathdale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack Slabotsky</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115069</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Slabotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115069</guid>
		<description>As Bullettooth mentioned, you can give Bill Simmons credit for creating smoke where there&#039;s no apparent fire. For months, he&#039;s been saying (half-jokingly) that the Tigers are going to be hemorrhaging money (bad economy and several bad contracts combined with what he thinks is a bad team) and will therefore be forced to shed salary. His logic for mentioning Cabrera is that among the well-paid Tigers, Guillen, Ordonez, N-Rob, Willis, and Bondo are all overpaid, so Cabrera is the only one with value. It was purely speculation on Simmons&#039; part, but the rumor began to gain some legitimacy when Peter Gammons mentioned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Bullettooth mentioned, you can give Bill Simmons credit for creating smoke where there&#8217;s no apparent fire. For months, he&#8217;s been saying (half-jokingly) that the Tigers are going to be hemorrhaging money (bad economy and several bad contracts combined with what he thinks is a bad team) and will therefore be forced to shed salary. His logic for mentioning Cabrera is that among the well-paid Tigers, Guillen, Ordonez, N-Rob, Willis, and Bondo are all overpaid, so Cabrera is the only one with value. It was purely speculation on Simmons&#8217; part, but the rumor began to gain some legitimacy when Peter Gammons mentioned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115017</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-115017</guid>
		<description>This has no chance of happening.  If we start struggling very badly, Polanco could be dealt at the deadline and Ordonez and Guillen would also be candidates to be traded at some point.  But Cabrera will be a Tiger for the duration of his contract (barring injury, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has no chance of happening.  If we start struggling very badly, Polanco could be dealt at the deadline and Ordonez and Guillen would also be candidates to be traded at some point.  But Cabrera will be a Tiger for the duration of his contract (barring injury, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-114998</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2009/04/about-that-cabrera-rumor/#comment-114998</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s sad this has gotten so much traction since there is not one shred of evidence to back it up.  life in the big city, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s sad this has gotten so much traction since there is not one shred of evidence to back it up.  life in the big city, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

