<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tigers Top 10 Prospects according to Baseball America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-110061</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-110061</guid>
		<description>I saw recently signed pitching prospect Mike LaLuna pitch most of this past summer for the Independant Can-Am League Sussex Skyhawks. He was un-hittable and missed lots of bats while helping them win their championship under former MLB manager Hal Lanier. Considering that he was a shortstop for all of his college ball years he seemed very impressive and mature on the mound. Where do you see him going this season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw recently signed pitching prospect Mike LaLuna pitch most of this past summer for the Independant Can-Am League Sussex Skyhawks. He was un-hittable and missed lots of bats while helping them win their championship under former MLB manager Hal Lanier. Considering that he was a shortstop for all of his college ball years he seemed very impressive and mature on the mound. Where do you see him going this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108977</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108977</guid>
		<description>Chris, I know. The Twins are a prime example of a team that focuses on throwing strikes rather than K&#039;ing guys. I&#039;m just not sure the A&#039;s are a franchise in that mold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I know. The Twins are a prime example of a team that focuses on throwing strikes rather than K&#8217;ing guys. I&#8217;m just not sure the A&#8217;s are a franchise in that mold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108968</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108968</guid>
		<description>Mike:  It&#039;s not out of the realm of possibilty that an organization would stress a &quot;pitch to contact&quot; philosophy in regards to developing pitchers.  That&#039;s probably not the Tigers MO, though.  Verlander (and Zumaya since he was developed as a starter) struck out more than a batter per inning in the minors.  I was merely speaking (er, typing) extemporaneously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  It&#8217;s not out of the realm of possibilty that an organization would stress a &#8220;pitch to contact&#8221; philosophy in regards to developing pitchers.  That&#8217;s probably not the Tigers MO, though.  Verlander (and Zumaya since he was developed as a starter) struck out more than a batter per inning in the minors.  I was merely speaking (er, typing) extemporaneously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108953</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108953</guid>
		<description>@ Tigercub:

I do think Porcello&#039;s strikeouts would&#039;ve been better with his curveball. Would they be at an elite level? i&#039;m not positive they would be.

@ Mark:
Good point about starts made after May 30th. That doesn&#039;t change my feelings on it, but that would make it just a bit easier to absorb. 

@ Chris:

I&#039;ll have to find the link, but there was an article that talked to Porcello where he said himself that the scouts blew up his velocity. He absolutely can sit around 95, but he throws a 2-seamer as his main fastball which is in the 90-92 range. This is also the reason for his massive GB rates, as the 2-seamer give the more sink than his 4-seamer. He said it&#039;s just something he feels comfortable doing and that he&#039;s fine with letting his teammates turn GB&#039;s into outs but knows that he&#039;ll have to dial up a K from time to time and that his 4-seamer or breaking ball are great out pitches.

@ Chris again:

Verlander has great stuff, but that doesn&#039;t translate to K&#039;s. My previous paragraph on Porcello I think hits on what I think the reason for low K rates were caused by: his comfort in getting GB&#039;s and keeping his pitch counts down. I would obviously rather have him K a lot of guys, but if he&#039;s going to let the ball be put in play, getting it on the ground is the best option he can choose. I think next year he&#039;ll strikeout something like 18-20% of the batters he faces with something around 50-53% GB rates with most of that work coming in Erie. If he&#039;s in Detroit then, I would look for him to post more numbers like his High-A stint: Low K&#039;s, very good GB rates as great, hard, sinking 2-seamers play at all levels of baseball.

Also, I doubt it&#039;s something &#039;organizational.&#039; Maybe I&#039;m mis-interpreting your statements, but that makes it sound like you think the Tigers are requesting these guys not K batters or something of that ilk. I don&#039;t think that Bondo&#039;s strikeout abilities stem from him being in Oakland&#039;s system, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tigercub:</p>
<p>I do think Porcello&#8217;s strikeouts would&#8217;ve been better with his curveball. Would they be at an elite level? i&#8217;m not positive they would be.</p>
<p>@ Mark:<br />
Good point about starts made after May 30th. That doesn&#8217;t change my feelings on it, but that would make it just a bit easier to absorb. </p>
<p>@ Chris:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to find the link, but there was an article that talked to Porcello where he said himself that the scouts blew up his velocity. He absolutely can sit around 95, but he throws a 2-seamer as his main fastball which is in the 90-92 range. This is also the reason for his massive GB rates, as the 2-seamer give the more sink than his 4-seamer. He said it&#8217;s just something he feels comfortable doing and that he&#8217;s fine with letting his teammates turn GB&#8217;s into outs but knows that he&#8217;ll have to dial up a K from time to time and that his 4-seamer or breaking ball are great out pitches.</p>
<p>@ Chris again:</p>
<p>Verlander has great stuff, but that doesn&#8217;t translate to K&#8217;s. My previous paragraph on Porcello I think hits on what I think the reason for low K rates were caused by: his comfort in getting GB&#8217;s and keeping his pitch counts down. I would obviously rather have him K a lot of guys, but if he&#8217;s going to let the ball be put in play, getting it on the ground is the best option he can choose. I think next year he&#8217;ll strikeout something like 18-20% of the batters he faces with something around 50-53% GB rates with most of that work coming in Erie. If he&#8217;s in Detroit then, I would look for him to post more numbers like his High-A stint: Low K&#8217;s, very good GB rates as great, hard, sinking 2-seamers play at all levels of baseball.</p>
<p>Also, I doubt it&#8217;s something &#8216;organizational.&#8217; Maybe I&#8217;m mis-interpreting your statements, but that makes it sound like you think the Tigers are requesting these guys not K batters or something of that ilk. I don&#8217;t think that Bondo&#8217;s strikeout abilities stem from him being in Oakland&#8217;s system, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108940</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108940</guid>
		<description>Man.  Those Giants love them some washed up veterans.  It&#039;s uncanny.

It&#039;s not a done deal yet, though.  Here&#039;s the scoop: http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081121&amp;content_id=3688385&amp;vkey=news_sf&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=sf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man.  Those Giants love them some washed up veterans.  It&#8217;s uncanny.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a done deal yet, though.  Here&#8217;s the scoop: <a href="http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081121&#038;content_id=3688385&#038;vkey=news_sf&#038;fext=.jsp&#038;c_id=sf" rel="nofollow">http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.....38;c_id=sf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigercub33</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108938</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigercub33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108938</guid>
		<description>Looks the ARB question is moot - the Giants appear to have signed Renteria...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks the ARB question is moot &#8211; the Giants appear to have signed Renteria&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108933</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108933</guid>
		<description>Rats, double posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rats, double posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108932</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108932</guid>
		<description>Jennifer - That would be a good thing for the Tiger. You can still offer a guy arbitration if he&#039;s signed somewhere else. If Renteria signs with another team before the Tigers have to decide to offer him arbitration, they can offer him arbitration (and get the compensation draft picks) without fear of him accepting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer &#8211; That would be a good thing for the Tiger. You can still offer a guy arbitration if he&#8217;s signed somewhere else. If Renteria signs with another team before the Tigers have to decide to offer him arbitration, they can offer him arbitration (and get the compensation draft picks) without fear of him accepting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108930</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108930</guid>
		<description>And another thing.  I wonder if Porcello&#039;s anemic K rates are not so much due to his talent as much as it&#039;s an organizational philosophy to be allergic to the strikeout.   I wonder this because there&#039;s no earthly reason that Justin Verlander shouldn&#039;t be striking out 200 guys per season.  The only really high K guy on the staff in recent years (starters only) has been Bonderman and he was developed by Oakland.  Of course Verlander did K 136 batters in 118 minor league innings so I&#039;m probably wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another thing.  I wonder if Porcello&#8217;s anemic K rates are not so much due to his talent as much as it&#8217;s an organizational philosophy to be allergic to the strikeout.   I wonder this because there&#8217;s no earthly reason that Justin Verlander shouldn&#8217;t be striking out 200 guys per season.  The only really high K guy on the staff in recent years (starters only) has been Bonderman and he was developed by Oakland.  Of course Verlander did K 136 batters in 118 minor league innings so I&#8217;m probably wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108929</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108929</guid>
		<description>One thing that bugs me about Porcello from what I&#039;ve read (of course I haven&#039;t actually, you know, seen him yet) is that his velocity seems to have been overstated.  The scouting reports coming out of high school had him &quot;sitting&quot; at 95, but apparently he&#039;s more like a 90-91 guy.  Not that it&#039;s a horribly big deal, but he&#039;s doesn&#039;t seem to be a &quot;power&quot; guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that bugs me about Porcello from what I&#8217;ve read (of course I haven&#8217;t actually, you know, seen him yet) is that his velocity seems to have been overstated.  The scouting reports coming out of high school had him &#8220;sitting&#8221; at 95, but apparently he&#8217;s more like a 90-91 guy.  Not that it&#8217;s a horribly big deal, but he&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t seem to be a &#8220;power&#8221; guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108928</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108928</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Renteria will be around to offer arbitration to.  ESPN.com rumors states Giants very interested, and the Braves have been mentioned as interested in a reunion as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Renteria will be around to offer arbitration to.  ESPN.com rumors states Giants very interested, and the Braves have been mentioned as interested in a reunion as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108927</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108927</guid>
		<description>Great job breaking down Porcello, Mike.  You make some compelling points, and it would definitely be encouraging to see higher K rates as he gets his full repertoire back.  I stand by my prediction that he makes 10 starts at the major league level primarily because of the lack of depth of the Tigers starting staff.  It doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s ready, I just think it&#039;s a distinct possibility.  Anything after a May 30 callup means he wouldn&#039;t be arb-eligible until after the 2011 season at the earliest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job breaking down Porcello, Mike.  You make some compelling points, and it would definitely be encouraging to see higher K rates as he gets his full repertoire back.  I stand by my prediction that he makes 10 starts at the major league level primarily because of the lack of depth of the Tigers starting staff.  It doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s ready, I just think it&#8217;s a distinct possibility.  Anything after a May 30 callup means he wouldn&#8217;t be arb-eligible until after the 2011 season at the earliest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigercub33</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108922</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigercub33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108922</guid>
		<description>Clarifying my Porcello comments - 

Perhaps I got a bit too excited.  I was not advocating for him to be called up right away, nor was I saying that he should not have to &quot;earn&quot; his job.  Basically, I just like the thought of him in the rotation more than Robertson or some of the minor league fodder that has a chance to be there.

Unless he has an absolutly stunning ST against REAL MLBers, I would hope that he would open in A (or possibly AA) and then get bumped aggressively (if warranted).  I realize that he also needs to build up his arm strength as this past year was probably twice as long as what he is used to.

Also, I was not basing my statement that he would have been better if he had his curve on anything other than my own feelings (while I embrace some aspects of SABR stuff - I still go by the gut feelings too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarifying my Porcello comments &#8211; </p>
<p>Perhaps I got a bit too excited.  I was not advocating for him to be called up right away, nor was I saying that he should not have to &#8220;earn&#8221; his job.  Basically, I just like the thought of him in the rotation more than Robertson or some of the minor league fodder that has a chance to be there.</p>
<p>Unless he has an absolutly stunning ST against REAL MLBers, I would hope that he would open in A (or possibly AA) and then get bumped aggressively (if warranted).  I realize that he also needs to build up his arm strength as this past year was probably twice as long as what he is used to.</p>
<p>Also, I was not basing my statement that he would have been better if he had his curve on anything other than my own feelings (while I embrace some aspects of SABR stuff &#8211; I still go by the gut feelings too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108917</guid>
		<description>@ Bill:

I absolutely understand that and I am a stats-based guy even when it comes to minor leaguers (once you get a feel for what kind of qualifications you can put on a kid and his successes/struggles due to parks, age, etc etc), but I&#039;m not ready to put A TON of stock into those numbers from Hamilton. He&#039;s a project, no doubt, but he&#039;s got arguably the highest upside of any kid in the system not named Rick Porcello -- I like him more than Casey Crosby. At least Hamilton&#039;s curve can flash as an average pitch at times, where as Crosby&#039;s at Lefty with a heater and Tommy John Surgery already. For me (and I know this will come across as rude, but you obviously know I don&#039;t mean it like that), I don&#039;t get how one can rank Crosby ahead of Hamilton at all. That seems kind of fool-hearty at this point in the game. 

@ The Rick Porcello in Detroit Talk:

Rick Porcello NEEDS to miss more bats. Yes, he did not throw his best breaking pitch (curve) most or all of the year in an attempt to work on his slider and change up. Yes,  he got massive amounts of ground balls.

But, I point to another big, RHP with elite level ground ball tendencies who also had his best pitch (curveball) taken from him in Low-A ball in 2007: Trevor Cahill, Oakland Athletics property.

Rick Porcello&#039;s 2008 in High-A Lakeland at age 19: 125 IP, 527 TBF, 116 H, 16 2B, 4 3B, 7 HR allowed, 72 K, 33 BB, 3.84 FIP, 3.44 base runs per 9 innings (all from firstinning.com). That equates out to 13.7% Strikeout %, 6.3 BB%, and 65% Ground ball rates.

Trevor Cahill&#039;s 2007 in Low-A Kane County:

105.1 IP, 437 TBF, 85 H, 15 2B, 3 3B, 3 HR allowed, 117 K, 40 BB, 2.87 FIP, 2.91 BsRns/9. That equates out to 26.8% K %, 9.2% BB rate, 59% GB rate.

Now, qualifiers: yes, Cahill was 19 and in Low-A where as Porcello was 19 and in High-A. That said, both had their best strikeout pitches taken from them, both got above-average/elite ground ball rates from these kids on the basis of their heavy, hard fastballs. Even if you give Cahill a knock down and Porcello a bump up for their ages relative to their levels, Cahill&#039;s performance still shows that getting a breaking pitch taken from you while in A-Ball should not mean you post anemic strikeout rates. I do realize that I&#039;m comparing Porcello to one of the preeminent pitching prospects in baseball today, but I don&#039;t feel that is unfair for a kid called the best prep pitcher in the 2007 draft.

In short, Porcello should probably open in High-A Lakeland for the first month (until the weather warms up and he can move to Erie ... I personally would have him in Lakeland longer for his development, but the Tigers won&#039;t be doing that), and he needs to impress when he gets his curveball back. Cahill DOMINATED High-A Stockton (hitters league) and Double-A Midland (hitters league) where as Porcello will be coming up through the Florida State League (pitchers league) and then the Eastern League which I believe is a pitchers league but might be closer to neutral, but that&#039;s just off the top of my head.

Porcello is, in my mind, not deserving of, nor close to, contributing at a level in which starting his arbitration clock would be a wise thing. I am happy to revisit this come July or thereabouts, but maybe a Sept. call-up is all that I&#039;m looking for from him. Other than that, he needs to prove to me that he can reach league average K-rates before I and comfortable even giving him a back-of-the-rotation spot and starting his arbitration clock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bill:</p>
<p>I absolutely understand that and I am a stats-based guy even when it comes to minor leaguers (once you get a feel for what kind of qualifications you can put on a kid and his successes/struggles due to parks, age, etc etc), but I&#8217;m not ready to put A TON of stock into those numbers from Hamilton. He&#8217;s a project, no doubt, but he&#8217;s got arguably the highest upside of any kid in the system not named Rick Porcello &#8212; I like him more than Casey Crosby. At least Hamilton&#8217;s curve can flash as an average pitch at times, where as Crosby&#8217;s at Lefty with a heater and Tommy John Surgery already. For me (and I know this will come across as rude, but you obviously know I don&#8217;t mean it like that), I don&#8217;t get how one can rank Crosby ahead of Hamilton at all. That seems kind of fool-hearty at this point in the game. </p>
<p>@ The Rick Porcello in Detroit Talk:</p>
<p>Rick Porcello NEEDS to miss more bats. Yes, he did not throw his best breaking pitch (curve) most or all of the year in an attempt to work on his slider and change up. Yes,  he got massive amounts of ground balls.</p>
<p>But, I point to another big, RHP with elite level ground ball tendencies who also had his best pitch (curveball) taken from him in Low-A ball in 2007: Trevor Cahill, Oakland Athletics property.</p>
<p>Rick Porcello&#8217;s 2008 in High-A Lakeland at age 19: 125 IP, 527 TBF, 116 H, 16 2B, 4 3B, 7 HR allowed, 72 K, 33 BB, 3.84 FIP, 3.44 base runs per 9 innings (all from firstinning.com). That equates out to 13.7% Strikeout %, 6.3 BB%, and 65% Ground ball rates.</p>
<p>Trevor Cahill&#8217;s 2007 in Low-A Kane County:</p>
<p>105.1 IP, 437 TBF, 85 H, 15 2B, 3 3B, 3 HR allowed, 117 K, 40 BB, 2.87 FIP, 2.91 BsRns/9. That equates out to 26.8% K %, 9.2% BB rate, 59% GB rate.</p>
<p>Now, qualifiers: yes, Cahill was 19 and in Low-A where as Porcello was 19 and in High-A. That said, both had their best strikeout pitches taken from them, both got above-average/elite ground ball rates from these kids on the basis of their heavy, hard fastballs. Even if you give Cahill a knock down and Porcello a bump up for their ages relative to their levels, Cahill&#8217;s performance still shows that getting a breaking pitch taken from you while in A-Ball should not mean you post anemic strikeout rates. I do realize that I&#8217;m comparing Porcello to one of the preeminent pitching prospects in baseball today, but I don&#8217;t feel that is unfair for a kid called the best prep pitcher in the 2007 draft.</p>
<p>In short, Porcello should probably open in High-A Lakeland for the first month (until the weather warms up and he can move to Erie &#8230; I personally would have him in Lakeland longer for his development, but the Tigers won&#8217;t be doing that), and he needs to impress when he gets his curveball back. Cahill DOMINATED High-A Stockton (hitters league) and Double-A Midland (hitters league) where as Porcello will be coming up through the Florida State League (pitchers league) and then the Eastern League which I believe is a pitchers league but might be closer to neutral, but that&#8217;s just off the top of my head.</p>
<p>Porcello is, in my mind, not deserving of, nor close to, contributing at a level in which starting his arbitration clock would be a wise thing. I am happy to revisit this come July or thereabouts, but maybe a Sept. call-up is all that I&#8217;m looking for from him. Other than that, he needs to prove to me that he can reach league average K-rates before I and comfortable even giving him a back-of-the-rotation spot and starting his arbitration clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/11/tigers-top-10-prospects-according-to-baseball-america/#comment-108915</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/?p=3509#comment-108915</guid>
		<description>Hey Bill


I was wondering...do you plan on doing any interview(s) this off season with Tigers players (major or minor league) and/or broadcasters/front office guys?

Plus how have you gotten interviews in the past? Email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bill</p>
<p>I was wondering&#8230;do you plan on doing any interview(s) this off season with Tigers players (major or minor league) and/or broadcasters/front office guys?</p>
<p>Plus how have you gotten interviews in the past? Email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

