<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One less inefficiency to exploit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:11:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104298</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104298</guid>
		<description>I think a trend in smaller market teams going over slot and getting the talent that they want/need is good for the game in general.  It really has to suck to be a Royals or Pirates fan for instance.  Much like we felt as Tigers fans for the better part of two decades.  If a team doesn&#039;t have the budget for big free agents or locking up their own stars to long term deals, replenishing through the draft is a cheap and quick way to keep the team competitive.  Of course, screwing up just one draft can set you back a ways.  Looking at you, Houston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a trend in smaller market teams going over slot and getting the talent that they want/need is good for the game in general.  It really has to suck to be a Royals or Pirates fan for instance.  Much like we felt as Tigers fans for the better part of two decades.  If a team doesn&#8217;t have the budget for big free agents or locking up their own stars to long term deals, replenishing through the draft is a cheap and quick way to keep the team competitive.  Of course, screwing up just one draft can set you back a ways.  Looking at you, Houston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104295</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104295</guid>
		<description>I looked at money-over-slot last year to see where the Tigers ranked in what I believed was the better indicator of a team&#039;s willingness to spend. It does shuffle up the order because some teams don&#039;t spend much after the top pick. 

It might not really speak to Billfer&#039;s point too much, though, which was getting elite talent like Miller and Porcello as a later pick may not be possible anymore. (I know Miller was the sixth pick, but nobody thought he should&#039;ve slipped that far.) Regardless of what teams are doing in the later rounds, if they&#039;re not from Houston, they seem to be committing to taking the top talent and taking their medicine when it comes to the boni.

I think the idea of spending over slot in the later rounds does, however, speak to the proper approach in response to this fact. Teams need to do due diligence to find guys who will waver on their desire to go to college and guys whose injury concerns aren&#039;t all that concerning. Then they need to pony up and get those guys in the fold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at money-over-slot last year to see where the Tigers ranked in what I believed was the better indicator of a team&#8217;s willingness to spend. It does shuffle up the order because some teams don&#8217;t spend much after the top pick. </p>
<p>It might not really speak to Billfer&#8217;s point too much, though, which was getting elite talent like Miller and Porcello as a later pick may not be possible anymore. (I know Miller was the sixth pick, but nobody thought he should&#8217;ve slipped that far.) Regardless of what teams are doing in the later rounds, if they&#8217;re not from Houston, they seem to be committing to taking the top talent and taking their medicine when it comes to the boni.</p>
<p>I think the idea of spending over slot in the later rounds does, however, speak to the proper approach in response to this fact. Teams need to do due diligence to find guys who will waver on their desire to go to college and guys whose injury concerns aren&#8217;t all that concerning. Then they need to pony up and get those guys in the fold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subrata Sircar</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104286</link>
		<dc:creator>Subrata Sircar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104286</guid>
		<description>It might be nice to evaluate team drafts on money-over-slot; that should be a better indicator of signing guys who are slipping due to financial constraints.  For example, if the Tigers signed a guy at #20 and paid him more money than guys picked after him, that&#039;s not the Tigers failing to sign a guy because of budget. 

We can also look at the Tigers draft relative to some preseason draft rankings - did they in fact take the best available guys, as ranked by a consensus of those rankings? or did they pass on a guy due to injury/financial constraints?

Regardless of that, the Royals in particular stepped up in a big way this draft, which supports the overall point.  Hopefully they picked the right players to reward with their largesse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be nice to evaluate team drafts on money-over-slot; that should be a better indicator of signing guys who are slipping due to financial constraints.  For example, if the Tigers signed a guy at #20 and paid him more money than guys picked after him, that&#8217;s not the Tigers failing to sign a guy because of budget. </p>
<p>We can also look at the Tigers draft relative to some preseason draft rankings &#8211; did they in fact take the best available guys, as ranked by a consensus of those rankings? or did they pass on a guy due to injury/financial constraints?</p>
<p>Regardless of that, the Royals in particular stepped up in a big way this draft, which supports the overall point.  Hopefully they picked the right players to reward with their largesse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew C.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104249</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104249</guid>
		<description>Boni.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104246</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/08/one-less-inefficiency-to-exploit/#comment-104246</guid>
		<description>Who were the top teams, as far as signing bonuses, in previous years?  Even with guys slipping I would still expect it to be skewed towards the teams picking early in the draft because they aren&#039;t really getting that much of a discount on their early picks (the top pick still gets alot of money, even if the Tigers also pay alot of money to someone with the 20th pick) and that gap should rise with each round beyond the 1st.  Maybin, Miller and Porcello were all first round picks but first round signing bonuses are only a portion of this equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who were the top teams, as far as signing bonuses, in previous years?  Even with guys slipping I would still expect it to be skewed towards the teams picking early in the draft because they aren&#8217;t really getting that much of a discount on their early picks (the top pick still gets alot of money, even if the Tigers also pay alot of money to someone with the 20th pick) and that gap should rise with each round beyond the 1st.  Maybin, Miller and Porcello were all first round picks but first round signing bonuses are only a portion of this equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
