<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 40:  Tigers at Royals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:11:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84599</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84599</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I’d say it’s an inconsistent strike zone, rather than a big one.&lt;/b&gt;   

Whatever it is, it&#039;s part of the conspiracy/vendetta against Sheffield. Even when he&#039;s not in the lineup. This team will not get any calls while Sheffield is on it, I tell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I’d say it’s an inconsistent strike zone, rather than a big one.</b>   </p>
<p>Whatever it is, it&#8217;s part of the conspiracy/vendetta against Sheffield. Even when he&#8217;s not in the lineup. This team will not get any calls while Sheffield is on it, I tell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84598</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84598</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I’m pretty certain it’s impossible to win a game when you score 0 runs.&lt;/b&gt;

Should be posted in the Tigers locker room. Maybe it already is, but fading of the letters &quot;im&quot; has led to confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I’m pretty certain it’s impossible to win a game when you score 0 runs.</b></p>
<p>Should be posted in the Tigers locker room. Maybe it already is, but fading of the letters &#8220;im&#8221; has led to confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84597</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84597</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Amusing….I sense that the Royals actually think they need another insurance run…&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Bless their little hearts.&lt;/b&gt;

Bad games inspire great humor. There&#039;s a silver lining for ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Amusing….I sense that the Royals actually think they need another insurance run…</b></p>
<p><b>Bless their little hearts.</b></p>
<p>Bad games inspire great humor. There&#8217;s a silver lining for ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84596</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84596</guid>
		<description>Brian in Tampa

&lt;b&gt;I would love to see Van Slyke manage this team. He tells it like it is, and doesn’t take crap from anybody. He doesn’t care if your a veteran or a rookie.&lt;/b&gt;

In private, I would bet that Leyland tells it like it is and doesn&#039;t take crap from anybody. That last part is crucial, though. Special treatment and different standards for performance seem to be happening. That&#039;s bad management, in baseball or anywhere.

Maybe, when Sheffield came to Detroit, Leyland gave him his word on something he shouldn&#039;t have. I can see someone like Leyland placing that kind of obligation above the team. I can almost sympathize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian in Tampa</p>
<p><b>I would love to see Van Slyke manage this team. He tells it like it is, and doesn’t take crap from anybody. He doesn’t care if your a veteran or a rookie.</b></p>
<p>In private, I would bet that Leyland tells it like it is and doesn&#8217;t take crap from anybody. That last part is crucial, though. Special treatment and different standards for performance seem to be happening. That&#8217;s bad management, in baseball or anywhere.</p>
<p>Maybe, when Sheffield came to Detroit, Leyland gave him his word on something he shouldn&#8217;t have. I can see someone like Leyland placing that kind of obligation above the team. I can almost sympathize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84595</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84595</guid>
		<description>Mark in Chicago

&lt;b&gt;Trade pudge for anything.&lt;/b&gt;

Yeah. My only concern is... well, given the track record on pitching so far, never mind. Trade him. This is surely a dumb fan comment, but I like the idea of Inge, warts and all, providing a spark at catcher. Something to prove, not just phoning it in. I&#039;ll relent if they DH Guillen and give Inge 3B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark in Chicago</p>
<p><b>Trade pudge for anything.</b></p>
<p>Yeah. My only concern is&#8230; well, given the track record on pitching so far, never mind. Trade him. This is surely a dumb fan comment, but I like the idea of Inge, warts and all, providing a spark at catcher. Something to prove, not just phoning it in. I&#8217;ll relent if they DH Guillen and give Inge 3B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84593</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84593</guid>
		<description>Greg

&lt;b&gt;I know its a different sport, but Larry Bird once said he’d never coach any professional team more than 3 years.&lt;/b&gt;

Great observation and commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg</p>
<p><b>I know its a different sport, but Larry Bird once said he’d never coach any professional team more than 3 years.</b></p>
<p>Great observation and commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig M</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84592</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84592</guid>
		<description>What happened to GUM TIME?  

BRING IT BACK, it seems like it was the only thing that worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to GUM TIME?  </p>
<p>BRING IT BACK, it seems like it was the only thing that worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84575</guid>
		<description>Your hidden point is quite right. I don&#039;t see the wildcard coming out of this division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your hidden point is quite right. I don&#8217;t see the wildcard coming out of this division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84573</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84573</guid>
		<description>Kurt, you&#039;re probably right. My hidden point was that the Tigers almost certainly need to win the division to make the playoffs, with the Red Sox/Yankees and Angels/A&#039;s in the other divisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt, you&#8217;re probably right. My hidden point was that the Tigers almost certainly need to win the division to make the playoffs, with the Red Sox/Yankees and Angels/A&#8217;s in the other divisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84571</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84571</guid>
		<description>Well Sean, I have to say I think no team is going to win 96+ in the Central. 86 maybe. But somehow at this point it&#039;s hard to picture the Tigers going 70-52 to get to that point either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Sean, I have to say I think no team is going to win 96+ in the Central. 86 maybe. But somehow at this point it&#8217;s hard to picture the Tigers going 70-52 to get to that point either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark J</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84563</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84563</guid>
		<description>I agree that it&#039;s time to sit some of the vets. That&#039;s the only thing left to try to wake these guys up. Ranting didn&#039;t work. Leyland has said on many occasions that performance should dictate playing time. I&#039;m willing to give people some time to work out of slumps, but at this point in the season if you haven&#039;t produced consistently, you should be benched. 

Renteria can&#039;t hit and can&#039;t field. I think he should be riding the pine and Santiago, who has better range in the field and is currently performing much better at the plate should start in his place. Inge should be our full time 3rd baseman (he has a better OBP and Slugging percentage than Renteria even though his batting average is lower) and Guillen should be DH full time. 

Sheff should be riding the pine. I&#039;m willing to give him another shot if and when his shoulder is right, but until then he is an offensive and defensive liability. I can&#039;t tell you how tired I am of hearing about that shoulder. Rayburn is hitting over 300 - someone tell my why he can&#039;t get in the game on a consistent basis. 

Basically, Leyland has to play guys that perform at the plate and/or in the field, and if that means starting someone other than a &quot;superstar&quot; so be it. Maybe being benched is what they need to snap out of their complacency. It&#039;s the only thing left to try to wake these guys up. I might give them a little more slack if they looked like they were working hard out there, but they look like they don&#039;t care, and lack of effort is inexcusable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s time to sit some of the vets. That&#8217;s the only thing left to try to wake these guys up. Ranting didn&#8217;t work. Leyland has said on many occasions that performance should dictate playing time. I&#8217;m willing to give people some time to work out of slumps, but at this point in the season if you haven&#8217;t produced consistently, you should be benched. </p>
<p>Renteria can&#8217;t hit and can&#8217;t field. I think he should be riding the pine and Santiago, who has better range in the field and is currently performing much better at the plate should start in his place. Inge should be our full time 3rd baseman (he has a better OBP and Slugging percentage than Renteria even though his batting average is lower) and Guillen should be DH full time. </p>
<p>Sheff should be riding the pine. I&#8217;m willing to give him another shot if and when his shoulder is right, but until then he is an offensive and defensive liability. I can&#8217;t tell you how tired I am of hearing about that shoulder. Rayburn is hitting over 300 &#8211; someone tell my why he can&#8217;t get in the game on a consistent basis. </p>
<p>Basically, Leyland has to play guys that perform at the plate and/or in the field, and if that means starting someone other than a &#8220;superstar&#8221; so be it. Maybe being benched is what they need to snap out of their complacency. It&#8217;s the only thing left to try to wake these guys up. I might give them a little more slack if they looked like they were working hard out there, but they look like they don&#8217;t care, and lack of effort is inexcusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84561</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84561</guid>
		<description>Bilfer would make a great manager and he could bring that pitching machine along as our new ace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bilfer would make a great manager and he could bring that pitching machine along as our new ace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotsw</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84560</link>
		<dc:creator>scotsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84560</guid>
		<description>Oh, and my other candidate for TIgers manager: Billfer. But they&#039;d never give him the job, because he&#039;s too valuable in his present blog-master role.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and my other candidate for TIgers manager: Billfer. But they&#8217;d never give him the job, because he&#8217;s too valuable in his present blog-master role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotsw</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84558</link>
		<dc:creator>scotsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84558</guid>
		<description>The key statistic to me is the eye-opening fact that this team, over the past 238 games, HAS A LOSING RECORD! Agreed there&#039;s a leadership problem. There are a lot of good players and pieces in that clubhouse, but where is the fireplug? Which one of these guys is breaking the water cooler and smashing helmets and bats? Where&#039;s the bloody intensity?

I agree that Van Slyke might be a great candidate to lead this team, but I think that until the vets start producing, you have to start playing Raburn, Joyce and even Hessman regularly, and if they produce, keep them in the lineup. And if someone points to their contract and bitches, reply that it&#039;s a business, not a charity, and guys who produce will play.

Galarraga is a great case in point -- If you don&#039;t keep giving him the ball, you send the signal that history matters more than present effort and performance. And that sort of message is a VERY VERY bad one to send.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key statistic to me is the eye-opening fact that this team, over the past 238 games, HAS A LOSING RECORD! Agreed there&#8217;s a leadership problem. There are a lot of good players and pieces in that clubhouse, but where is the fireplug? Which one of these guys is breaking the water cooler and smashing helmets and bats? Where&#8217;s the bloody intensity?</p>
<p>I agree that Van Slyke might be a great candidate to lead this team, but I think that until the vets start producing, you have to start playing Raburn, Joyce and even Hessman regularly, and if they produce, keep them in the lineup. And if someone points to their contract and bitches, reply that it&#8217;s a business, not a charity, and guys who produce will play.</p>
<p>Galarraga is a great case in point &#8212; If you don&#8217;t keep giving him the ball, you send the signal that history matters more than present effort and performance. And that sort of message is a VERY VERY bad one to send.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean C. in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84557</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean C. in Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/05/game-40-tigers-at-royals/#comment-84557</guid>
		<description>I like to cheer people up. It&#039;s what I do. So I bring the glad tidings that the Tigers only need to go 80-42 from here on out to finish 2nd in the division and miss the playoffs altogether.

.656 for 122 games. The 1984 Tigers probably did it. The 2006 Tigers came close. Other than that... I think the last time the Tigers were that hot, uniforms were baggy and teams traveled by train.

Seriously, though. I know the team&#039;s a drag right now, but it&#039;s still a good time to be a Tigers fan. Better times coming soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to cheer people up. It&#8217;s what I do. So I bring the glad tidings that the Tigers only need to go 80-42 from here on out to finish 2nd in the division and miss the playoffs altogether.</p>
<p>.656 for 122 games. The 1984 Tigers probably did it. The 2006 Tigers came close. Other than that&#8230; I think the last time the Tigers were that hot, uniforms were baggy and teams traveled by train.</p>
<p>Seriously, though. I know the team&#8217;s a drag right now, but it&#8217;s still a good time to be a Tigers fan. Better times coming soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
