<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76175</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76175</guid>
		<description>Sky: Good work - enjoyed checking it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sky: Good work &#8211; enjoyed checking it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76165</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76165</guid>
		<description>David -

There really isn&#039;t the a means to analyze the old timers, beyond what is already done at this time.

Sky - 

Thanks for the info.  I&#039;ll probably readdress this and add in SGs work as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David -</p>
<p>There really isn&#8217;t the a means to analyze the old timers, beyond what is already done at this time.</p>
<p>Sky &#8211; </p>
<p>Thanks for the info.  I&#8217;ll probably readdress this and add in SGs work as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76161</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76161</guid>
		<description>Between Sean&#039;s TotalZone and SG&#039;s work on compiling STATS zone rating numbers since 1987 (that&#039;s why Sean stopped TZ at 1986), you&#039;ve got full data for the past 50 years.  No, neither system is as good as UZR, but they&#039;re better than nothing (or next to nothing, like I consider gold gloves and fielding percentage.)  Links to the fielding data I use (50 years of range, catcher career numbers, four years of outfielder arms, six years of UZR) are at this page:

http://skyking162.com/2008/01/fielding-stats-for-everybody/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between Sean&#8217;s TotalZone and SG&#8217;s work on compiling STATS zone rating numbers since 1987 (that&#8217;s why Sean stopped TZ at 1986), you&#8217;ve got full data for the past 50 years.  No, neither system is as good as UZR, but they&#8217;re better than nothing (or next to nothing, like I consider gold gloves and fielding percentage.)  Links to the fielding data I use (50 years of range, catcher career numbers, four years of outfielder arms, six years of UZR) are at this page:</p>
<p><a href="http://skyking162.com/2008/01/fielding-stats-for-everybody/" rel="nofollow">http://skyking162.com/2008/01/.....everybody/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76160</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76160</guid>
		<description>Al Kaline was my hero, David.  I absolutely loved him as a young lady.  Yes, he was all the things you read and hear about him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Kaline was my hero, David.  I absolutely loved him as a young lady.  Yes, he was all the things you read and hear about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76157</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76157</guid>
		<description>I wonder if you could do anything on Ty Cobb  Sam Crawford or Gehringer finding out arm strength/accuracy, fielding skills and range comparing them to their contemporaries...

Also another thought in my mind that I would do except I have no idea how to collect the data would be to look at Inge&#039;s 2006 season.

Comparing his 2006 range to other top notch seasons because I don&#039;t know how many I&#039;ve seen that were even close (granted I&#039;m not very old, but do watch quite a bit of baseball)

In any event I wish I would have seen Kaline play.  Was he that fast?  All I&#039;ve heard about his his rocket for an arm in RF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you could do anything on Ty Cobb  Sam Crawford or Gehringer finding out arm strength/accuracy, fielding skills and range comparing them to their contemporaries&#8230;</p>
<p>Also another thought in my mind that I would do except I have no idea how to collect the data would be to look at Inge&#8217;s 2006 season.</p>
<p>Comparing his 2006 range to other top notch seasons because I don&#8217;t know how many I&#8217;ve seen that were even close (granted I&#8217;m not very old, but do watch quite a bit of baseball)</p>
<p>In any event I wish I would have seen Kaline play.  Was he that fast?  All I&#8217;ve heard about his his rocket for an arm in RF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slashpyne</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76155</link>
		<dc:creator>Slashpyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76155</guid>
		<description>As they say on another site: Damn Interesting!
I&#039;d like to see a Ryne Sandberg (sp) vs. Lou Whitaker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they say on another site: Damn Interesting!<br />
I&#8217;d like to see a Ryne Sandberg (sp) vs. Lou Whitaker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob V.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76151</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76151</guid>
		<description>Good stuff, Bill.  I&#039;d love to see a top 10 list at each position (or even deeper, if possible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff, Bill.  I&#8217;d love to see a top 10 list at each position (or even deeper, if possible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76149</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76149</guid>
		<description>Skyking 162 did a similar study, ranking the best fielders at each position in all of baseball historically.  They actually had Whitaker at +113 runs, which was the best for a 2B.  Kaline had the best single season at RF with +22.  You can check out the link here:

http://skyking162.com/2008/01/fun-with-historical-fielding-numbers/

They also had a nice little Tram/Lou feature, posted here:

http://skyking162.com/2008/01/bosom-buddies-trammel-and-whitaker/

I don&#039;t know if bilfer has linked to these before, but it&#039;s pretty interesting reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skyking 162 did a similar study, ranking the best fielders at each position in all of baseball historically.  They actually had Whitaker at +113 runs, which was the best for a 2B.  Kaline had the best single season at RF with +22.  You can check out the link here:</p>
<p><a href="http://skyking162.com/2008/01/fun-with-historical-fielding-numbers/" rel="nofollow">http://skyking162.com/2008/01/.....g-numbers/</a></p>
<p>They also had a nice little Tram/Lou feature, posted here:</p>
<p><a href="http://skyking162.com/2008/01/bosom-buddies-trammel-and-whitaker/" rel="nofollow">http://skyking162.com/2008/01/.....-whitaker/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if bilfer has linked to these before, but it&#8217;s pretty interesting reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJC in Detroit</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76148</link>
		<dc:creator>SJC in Detroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76148</guid>
		<description>So the numbers confirm what we saw with our eyes with Kaline -- that&#039;s comforting.  What about Mickey Stanley?  I always thought that he, like Kaline, positioned himself well, ran good routes and didn&#039;t make mistakes.  Did he not cover as much ground as Chester?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the numbers confirm what we saw with our eyes with Kaline &#8212; that&#8217;s comforting.  What about Mickey Stanley?  I always thought that he, like Kaline, positioned himself well, ran good routes and didn&#8217;t make mistakes.  Did he not cover as much ground as Chester?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76146</guid>
		<description>what about catchers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about catchers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/the-best-defense/#comment-76145</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be curious to see where Fryman fits in at third.  I know you only did &#039;86 and back so he didn&#039;t come up but he was a good defensive third basemen.  Although part of his strong suit was a strong arm which you said this doesn&#039;t measure but he was very accurate too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to see where Fryman fits in at third.  I know you only did &#8217;86 and back so he didn&#8217;t come up but he was a good defensive third basemen.  Although part of his strong suit was a strong arm which you said this doesn&#8217;t measure but he was very accurate too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

