<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2008-01-07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75545</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75545</guid>
		<description>I think Scott's on the money.  You've got 3 pitchers who all performed well below their capabilities last year, all due to injuries (less certain with Willis).  While it's a lot to hope for that they all return to form, it seems almost impossible that there won't be an overall improvement - the extent of which will probably tell the tale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Scott&#8217;s on the money.  You&#8217;ve got 3 pitchers who all performed well below their capabilities last year, all due to injuries (less certain with Willis).  While it&#8217;s a lot to hope for that they all return to form, it seems almost impossible that there won&#8217;t be an overall improvement - the extent of which will probably tell the tale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75503</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75503</guid>
		<description>Not sure how many of you have read the capsules from the guy in KC, but I thought it was some good analysis. He thinks the Tigers will "only" win 93 ... I think that's on the low end.

I think Bondo, Rogers and Willis are the keys. We're going to score lots of runs, somewhere between 5.8 - 6.0 per game most likely. If that pitching trio returns to form or close to it, the Tigers will be a lot closer to 100 wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how many of you have read the capsules from the guy in KC, but I thought it was some good analysis. He thinks the Tigers will &#8220;only&#8221; win 93 &#8230; I think that&#8217;s on the low end.</p>
<p>I think Bondo, Rogers and Willis are the keys. We&#8217;re going to score lots of runs, somewhere between 5.8 - 6.0 per game most likely. If that pitching trio returns to form or close to it, the Tigers will be a lot closer to 100 wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75502</guid>
		<description>LOL look at C-Mo, second in left field...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL look at C-Mo, second in left field&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian C.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75496</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2008/01/links-for-2008-01-07/#comment-75496</guid>
		<description>But.. but... I thought we were only supposed to talk about Roger Clemens today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But.. but&#8230; I thought we were only supposed to talk about Roger Clemens today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
