<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comerica Park&#8217;s outfield is so big&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:59:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One more post on Comerica&#8217;s outfield</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75299</link>
		<dc:creator>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One more post on Comerica&#8217;s outfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75299</guid>
		<description>[...] subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! There are a few items that didn&#8217;t fit into the other posts about the outfield park factors that I wanted to wrap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! There are a few items that didn&#8217;t fit into the other posts about the outfield park factors that I wanted to wrap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Outfield Park Factors part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75197</link>
		<dc:creator>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Outfield Park Factors part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75197</guid>
		<description>[...] Comerica Park&#8217;s outfield is so big&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comerica Park&#8217;s outfield is so big&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crunruh</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75172</link>
		<dc:creator>crunruh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75172</guid>
		<description>All parks have the same size gaps in that the two foul lines vector out at the same right angle.  Thus, outfielders playing at 350 feet out would have the same gap of space between them regardless of park.  If the outfielders play deeper because of the depth of the field, say 375 feet, the gaps between the outfielders would increase but the time to get to the ball would also increase negating some of the gap effect that a deep outfield has.  What should change more dramatically in a park with a deep outfield is the gap between the infielders and outfielders.  Infielders position themselves the same with little respect to park dimensions.  Outfielders moving back 20 feet in a deep outfield are going to be 20 feet further away from the infielders and 20 feet further away from any ball dropping in front of them and as a result singles and hustling doubles should increase.  

Another effect of a deep park is that balls that do make it through the gap are going to go farther favoring triples and stand-up doubles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All parks have the same size gaps in that the two foul lines vector out at the same right angle.  Thus, outfielders playing at 350 feet out would have the same gap of space between them regardless of park.  If the outfielders play deeper because of the depth of the field, say 375 feet, the gaps between the outfielders would increase but the time to get to the ball would also increase negating some of the gap effect that a deep outfield has.  What should change more dramatically in a park with a deep outfield is the gap between the infielders and outfielders.  Infielders position themselves the same with little respect to park dimensions.  Outfielders moving back 20 feet in a deep outfield are going to be 20 feet further away from the infielders and 20 feet further away from any ball dropping in front of them and as a result singles and hustling doubles should increase.  </p>
<p>Another effect of a deep park is that balls that do make it through the gap are going to go farther favoring triples and stand-up doubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in OH</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75161</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in OH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75161</guid>
		<description>Another great analysis. I feel like I learn something new every time I visit DTW. Great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great analysis. I feel like I learn something new every time I visit DTW. Great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Panas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75157</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Panas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/12/comerica-parks-outfield-is-so-big/#comment-75157</guid>
		<description>Excellent post Bill.  Maybe we should not be surprised when seemingly mediocre left fielders put up good range numbers as they have in recent years.  I&#039;d be interested to see the data specifically for line drives because everybody always says it&#039;s a great park for line drive gap hitters.  

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Bill.  Maybe we should not be surprised when seemingly mediocre left fielders put up good range numbers as they have in recent years.  I&#8217;d be interested to see the data specifically for line drives because everybody always says it&#8217;s a great park for line drive gap hitters.  </p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
