<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-11-05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:11:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73442</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73442</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mike R you forgot RF and DH assuming both are healthy…

Why go after Jenkins? I’d really like to see what Ryan Raburn could do over a full year.

Taking his stats from last year and multiplying it by 3 (so he would play 147 games.

84 runs, 81 rbis, 9 steals, 12 hrs, 6 triples, 36 doubles, .847 OPS, with what you guys seem to love so much a .304 BA

would Jenkins be better?

Raburn is turning 27

I’d say use the 5.5 mil or w/e they would spend on Jenkins or Stewart and use it towards another SP after Kenny (assuming he comes back for 8mil or so)

If Raburn doesn’t work out (I don’t see why he wouldn’t his minor league stats are good and he is entering his “prime”) you always can make a deal in June or w/e when some clubs have given up.

Unless they want to go after Miguel Cabrera and give up Maybin and two other good prospects and then I’m all for it.

Or go after Rowand.

I do not want a blah LF for 4-6 mil when we could easily fill that with a platoon or a deadline pickup.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, I&#039;m assuming that Omar Infante won&#039;t be back meaning that Raburn then takes over the super-sub position of backing up 2B, SS, 3B, LF, CF, and RF. 

Aaron Rowand is going to be grossly over paid. Like, insanely over paid. Not to mention, he&#039;s got injury questions and seems to embody all that you expressed concerns over Jenkins. And doesn&#039;t fix the &quot;no LH bat&quot; that the Tigers have been pining for for the last few years.

And what will be available at the deadline, will that be any upgrade at all? Adam Dunn, I suppose, but the price for him will be high and he&#039;s absolutely brutal in LF -- almost to the point where his defense undoes the great things he does with the stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mike R you forgot RF and DH assuming both are healthy…</p>
<p>Why go after Jenkins? I’d really like to see what Ryan Raburn could do over a full year.</p>
<p>Taking his stats from last year and multiplying it by 3 (so he would play 147 games.</p>
<p>84 runs, 81 rbis, 9 steals, 12 hrs, 6 triples, 36 doubles, .847 OPS, with what you guys seem to love so much a .304 BA</p>
<p>would Jenkins be better?</p>
<p>Raburn is turning 27</p>
<p>I’d say use the 5.5 mil or w/e they would spend on Jenkins or Stewart and use it towards another SP after Kenny (assuming he comes back for 8mil or so)</p>
<p>If Raburn doesn’t work out (I don’t see why he wouldn’t his minor league stats are good and he is entering his “prime”) you always can make a deal in June or w/e when some clubs have given up.</p>
<p>Unless they want to go after Miguel Cabrera and give up Maybin and two other good prospects and then I’m all for it.</p>
<p>Or go after Rowand.</p>
<p>I do not want a blah LF for 4-6 mil when we could easily fill that with a platoon or a deadline pickup.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m assuming that Omar Infante won&#8217;t be back meaning that Raburn then takes over the super-sub position of backing up 2B, SS, 3B, LF, CF, and RF. </p>
<p>Aaron Rowand is going to be grossly over paid. Like, insanely over paid. Not to mention, he&#8217;s got injury questions and seems to embody all that you expressed concerns over Jenkins. And doesn&#8217;t fix the &#8220;no LH bat&#8221; that the Tigers have been pining for for the last few years.</p>
<p>And what will be available at the deadline, will that be any upgrade at all? Adam Dunn, I suppose, but the price for him will be high and he&#8217;s absolutely brutal in LF &#8212; almost to the point where his defense undoes the great things he does with the stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle J</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73435</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73435</guid>
		<description>Granderson started 140 games this season (3 in LF, the rest in CF).

The Tigers played 43 games vs. left-handed pitchers.

So it appears Granderson didn&#039;t start about half the games vs. left-handed pitchers.

The fact that his L/R AB ratio is about the same as Magglio&#039;s indicates he faced some extra at bats vs. left-handed relievers.  In some cases, his defense no doubt justified this in games the Tigers were ahead (see Bilfer&#039;s post on defensive stats).

There&#039;s also the matter of whether it&#039;s smart to completely bench a relatively young player against all left-handers, depriving him of the ability to develop as a hitter against lefties.  And, of course, teams don&#039;t have unlimited benches and can&#039;t pinch hit in every situation.

Anyway, he gave us 530+ PA of a 1.014 OPS against right-handers.  The .494 OPS against left-handers is certainly cause for real concern--but every baseball player is a sum of his parts.  And I&#039;d be pleased to make a decent wager that the .494 # regresses upward next season.

I hope this assessment is worthy of at least a 12-year old level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granderson started 140 games this season (3 in LF, the rest in CF).</p>
<p>The Tigers played 43 games vs. left-handed pitchers.</p>
<p>So it appears Granderson didn&#8217;t start about half the games vs. left-handed pitchers.</p>
<p>The fact that his L/R AB ratio is about the same as Magglio&#8217;s indicates he faced some extra at bats vs. left-handed relievers.  In some cases, his defense no doubt justified this in games the Tigers were ahead (see Bilfer&#8217;s post on defensive stats).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the matter of whether it&#8217;s smart to completely bench a relatively young player against all left-handers, depriving him of the ability to develop as a hitter against lefties.  And, of course, teams don&#8217;t have unlimited benches and can&#8217;t pinch hit in every situation.</p>
<p>Anyway, he gave us 530+ PA of a 1.014 OPS against right-handers.  The .494 OPS against left-handers is certainly cause for real concern&#8211;but every baseball player is a sum of his parts.  And I&#8217;d be pleased to make a decent wager that the .494 # regresses upward next season.</p>
<p>I hope this assessment is worthy of at least a 12-year old level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73428</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73428</guid>
		<description>Mike R you forgot RF and DH assuming both are healthy...

Why go after Jenkins?  I&#039;d really like to see what Ryan Raburn could do over a full year.

Taking his stats from last year and multiplying it by 3 (so he would play 147 games.

84 runs, 81 rbis, 9 steals, 12 hrs, 6 triples, 36 doubles, .847 OPS, with what you guys seem to love so much a .304 BA

would Jenkins be better?

Raburn is turning 27


I&#039;d say use the 5.5 mil or w/e they would spend on Jenkins or Stewart and use it towards another SP after Kenny (assuming he comes back for 8mil or so)

If Raburn doesn&#039;t work out (I don&#039;t see why he wouldn&#039;t his minor league stats are good and he is entering his &quot;prime&quot;) you always can make a deal in June or w/e when some clubs have given up.

Unless they want to go after Miguel Cabrera and give up Maybin and two other good prospects and then I&#039;m all for it.

Or go after Rowand.

I do not want a blah LF for 4-6 mil when we could easily fill that with a platoon or a deadline pickup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike R you forgot RF and DH assuming both are healthy&#8230;</p>
<p>Why go after Jenkins?  I&#8217;d really like to see what Ryan Raburn could do over a full year.</p>
<p>Taking his stats from last year and multiplying it by 3 (so he would play 147 games.</p>
<p>84 runs, 81 rbis, 9 steals, 12 hrs, 6 triples, 36 doubles, .847 OPS, with what you guys seem to love so much a .304 BA</p>
<p>would Jenkins be better?</p>
<p>Raburn is turning 27</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say use the 5.5 mil or w/e they would spend on Jenkins or Stewart and use it towards another SP after Kenny (assuming he comes back for 8mil or so)</p>
<p>If Raburn doesn&#8217;t work out (I don&#8217;t see why he wouldn&#8217;t his minor league stats are good and he is entering his &#8220;prime&#8221;) you always can make a deal in June or w/e when some clubs have given up.</p>
<p>Unless they want to go after Miguel Cabrera and give up Maybin and two other good prospects and then I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
<p>Or go after Rowand.</p>
<p>I do not want a blah LF for 4-6 mil when we could easily fill that with a platoon or a deadline pickup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Cioe</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73427</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Cioe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73427</guid>
		<description>Bob,

I only said the last part of the season because that&#039;s most of what I watched.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>I only said the last part of the season because that&#8217;s most of what I watched.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobS.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73426</link>
		<dc:creator>BobS.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73426</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know,Eric.How many?And why was he left in to bat against a LHP anyway,if the situation was crucial enough for the opposing manager to bring one in to pitch for him?Certainly there was at least one right-hand batting pitcher sitting on the bench who could have shown more than Granderson&#039;s flailing.
There does seem to be some confusion as to whether it was &quot;most of last season&quot; or &quot;the later part of the season&quot; when Granderson sat against lefthanders.Implicit in the comments,however,are at least some degree of approval for Leyland coming to his senses and not having Granderson bat against lefthanders.
Shannon Stewart?I guess,if there&#039;s no porcelain dolls available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know,Eric.How many?And why was he left in to bat against a LHP anyway,if the situation was crucial enough for the opposing manager to bring one in to pitch for him?Certainly there was at least one right-hand batting pitcher sitting on the bench who could have shown more than Granderson&#8217;s flailing.<br />
There does seem to be some confusion as to whether it was &#8220;most of last season&#8221; or &#8220;the later part of the season&#8221; when Granderson sat against lefthanders.Implicit in the comments,however,are at least some degree of approval for Leyland coming to his senses and not having Granderson bat against lefthanders.<br />
Shannon Stewart?I guess,if there&#8217;s no porcelain dolls available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73425</guid>
		<description>The constant steadfast Granderson discussions make me long for a Brandon Inge debate again. You know, for something fresh and not beaten to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constant steadfast Granderson discussions make me long for a Brandon Inge debate again. You know, for something fresh and not beaten to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Cioe</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73423</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Cioe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73423</guid>
		<description>Bob,

But how many of those 119 ABs by Granderson against lefties were against starters versus situational lefties?  I mean, Jim Thome and David Ortiz probably saw a lot more ABs against lefties than the rest of their team, if only because, like Granderson, they don&#039;t do as well against lefties.  I watched games in the later part of the season where Granderson started the day on the bench because there was a left-handed starter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>But how many of those 119 ABs by Granderson against lefties were against starters versus situational lefties?  I mean, Jim Thome and David Ortiz probably saw a lot more ABs against lefties than the rest of their team, if only because, like Granderson, they don&#8217;t do as well against lefties.  I watched games in the later part of the season where Granderson started the day on the bench because there was a left-handed starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobS.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73420</link>
		<dc:creator>BobS.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73420</guid>
		<description>An excellent point,Kyle,if it were supported by reality.
Granderson had 119AB against lefthanders,out of a total of 612AB.Ordonez,by comparison,who is definitely not likely to be sitting against lefthanders,had 122AB against LHP out of a total of 595AB.
Not clouded.Eclipsed by fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent point,Kyle,if it were supported by reality.<br />
Granderson had 119AB against lefthanders,out of a total of 612AB.Ordonez,by comparison,who is definitely not likely to be sitting against lefthanders,had 122AB against LHP out of a total of 595AB.<br />
Not clouded.Eclipsed by fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle J</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73412</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73412</guid>
		<description>Bob, You claim Granderson should be a platoon player.  I point out that he was, in fact, used like a platoon player most of last season.  Please explain where you see that my judgement is clouded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, You claim Granderson should be a platoon player.  I point out that he was, in fact, used like a platoon player most of last season.  Please explain where you see that my judgement is clouded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobS.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73411</link>
		<dc:creator>BobS.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73411</guid>
		<description>Thank you,Eric.I wasn&#039;t aware of Jenkin&#039;s declining performance against LHP.Apparently his recent production makes current comparisons to Granderson even more apt.And also illustrates that improvement isn&#039;t inevitable.
Sorry,but repeatedly invoking Sizemore (as has been done more here on this thread and previously than my facetious HoF nominations) as Granderson&#039;s model for career development is based more on closing eyes and wishing,i.e.magical thinking, than actual facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you,Eric.I wasn&#8217;t aware of Jenkin&#8217;s declining performance against LHP.Apparently his recent production makes current comparisons to Granderson even more apt.And also illustrates that improvement isn&#8217;t inevitable.<br />
Sorry,but repeatedly invoking Sizemore (as has been done more here on this thread and previously than my facetious HoF nominations) as Granderson&#8217;s model for career development is based more on closing eyes and wishing,i.e.magical thinking, than actual facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73406</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73406</guid>
		<description>Bob -

Knock it off with the taunting.  You have mentioned Granderson&#039;s Hall of Fame candidacy more than anyone else on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob -</p>
<p>Knock it off with the taunting.  You have mentioned Granderson&#8217;s Hall of Fame candidacy more than anyone else on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73404</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73404</guid>
		<description>Well David, we&#039;re getting above average offensive production at SS, 2B and CF, so carrying an average offensive LFer and now having average offense at 1B is something we can do. Jenkins&#039; last 4 seasons offensively and weighted (with the most recent season weighted for most relevance) he was at 2 runs below what the average LFer is, in terms of runs created. Add in the fact that he&#039;s an above average defender (+7.9 runs defensively, varying depending on the metric. The one i used is from Justin Inaz, a blogger on the reds and baseball in general which you can find his defensive numbers &lt;a href=&quot;http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pfk_WuYpfduzefA8-s0_iYw&amp;gid=5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)  and he breaks even at the least. Add that to the fact that Marcus Thames is average overall as a LFer and that&#039;s all you want from a platoon.

That said, he is declining, and anything longer then 2 years and for more then, say $5.5 per year, will be excessive in my eyes, if we go after him.

I&#039;d much prefer, though, to make a run at Shannon Stewart. He isn&#039;t much of a power threat but he&#039;s above average offensively and very solid defensively as well. He&#039;d also provide flexibility in the lineup and allow Granderson to hit lower in the order in a more run producing spot where he should be. There are some injury concerns with Stewart as his last 4 years he&#039;s played in 92 games, 132, 44, and 146. But that is a bargaining chip that will allow suitors to drop his asking price which can&#039;t be that high anyways. After there was little to no market for him, he went to Oakland for $1 million on a 1 year deal and he&#039;s a FA now and something like 2 years, incentive based, with a base salary around $4-ish million does not seem out of line with me at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well David, we&#8217;re getting above average offensive production at SS, 2B and CF, so carrying an average offensive LFer and now having average offense at 1B is something we can do. Jenkins&#8217; last 4 seasons offensively and weighted (with the most recent season weighted for most relevance) he was at 2 runs below what the average LFer is, in terms of runs created. Add in the fact that he&#8217;s an above average defender (+7.9 runs defensively, varying depending on the metric. The one i used is from Justin Inaz, a blogger on the reds and baseball in general which you can find his defensive numbers <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pfk_WuYpfduzefA8-s0_iYw&amp;gid=5" rel="nofollow">here</a>)  and he breaks even at the least. Add that to the fact that Marcus Thames is average overall as a LFer and that&#8217;s all you want from a platoon.</p>
<p>That said, he is declining, and anything longer then 2 years and for more then, say $5.5 per year, will be excessive in my eyes, if we go after him.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much prefer, though, to make a run at Shannon Stewart. He isn&#8217;t much of a power threat but he&#8217;s above average offensively and very solid defensively as well. He&#8217;d also provide flexibility in the lineup and allow Granderson to hit lower in the order in a more run producing spot where he should be. There are some injury concerns with Stewart as his last 4 years he&#8217;s played in 92 games, 132, 44, and 146. But that is a bargaining chip that will allow suitors to drop his asking price which can&#8217;t be that high anyways. After there was little to no market for him, he went to Oakland for $1 million on a 1 year deal and he&#8217;s a FA now and something like 2 years, incentive based, with a base salary around $4-ish million does not seem out of line with me at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73402</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73402</guid>
		<description>Granderson stinks against lefties
Inge stinks against righties

both do well against the opposite

As far as Jenkins - no thanks


I&#039;d much rather see Raburn/Thames/The Flavor of the Month (last year Timo Perez in &#039;06 Alexis Gomez etc.)

Outfielders+1st basemen = highest level of offensive production</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granderson stinks against lefties<br />
Inge stinks against righties</p>
<p>both do well against the opposite</p>
<p>As far as Jenkins &#8211; no thanks</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather see Raburn/Thames/The Flavor of the Month (last year Timo Perez in &#8216;06 Alexis Gomez etc.)</p>
<p>Outfielders+1st basemen = highest level of offensive production</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince in MN</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73401</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince in MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73401</guid>
		<description>If you compare Sizemore&#039;s 2nd full season (&#039;06 - .290/.375/.533/.907)) with Granderson&#039;s 2nd full season (&#039;07 - .302/.361/.552/.913 ) they are actually fairly similar. Granderson was quite a bit better vs RH than Sizemore, while somewhat worse vs LH. Jump to Sizemore&#039;s &#039;07 splits and you will note the big improvement he made vs LH this year. I see no reason Curtis can&#039;t improve vs LH in &#039;08, maybe not to the extent Sizemore did, but better than his .160/.225/.269/.494 of this year. 

Sizemore &#039;06 Splits:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7256/splits;_ylt=ArLRe8fhw5ExpxIuXcyIKm6FCLcF?year=2006&amp;type=Batting

Granderson &#039;07 splits:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7455/splits;_ylt=AqPzWVWki2ZKtWF9Sr7g1.GFCLcF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you compare Sizemore&#8217;s 2nd full season (&#8216;06 &#8211; .290/.375/.533/.907)) with Granderson&#8217;s 2nd full season (&#8216;07 &#8211; .302/.361/.552/.913 ) they are actually fairly similar. Granderson was quite a bit better vs RH than Sizemore, while somewhat worse vs LH. Jump to Sizemore&#8217;s &#8216;07 splits and you will note the big improvement he made vs LH this year. I see no reason Curtis can&#8217;t improve vs LH in &#8216;08, maybe not to the extent Sizemore did, but better than his .160/.225/.269/.494 of this year. </p>
<p>Sizemore &#8216;06 Splits:<br />
<a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7256/splits;_ylt=ArLRe8fhw5ExpxIuXcyIKm6FCLcF?year=2006&amp;type=Batting" rel="nofollow">http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/pl.....pe=Batting</a></p>
<p>Granderson &#8216;07 splits:<br />
<a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7455/splits;_ylt=AqPzWVWki2ZKtWF9Sr7g1.GFCLcF" rel="nofollow">http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/pl.....7g1.GFCLcF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric W. Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73400</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric W. Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/11/links-for-2007-11-05/#comment-73400</guid>
		<description>BobS - 

You have to consider that Jenkins&#039; career success against lefties is heavily skewed towards the early part of his career. In his first 6 years he hit .268 against lefties. 

In his last 4 years, his avg against LHP is .211. And if you take out his career year in 2005 that I mentioned earlier, it&#039;s only .190. 

The fact that his HR pace against LHP has actually increased over time just points towards my assertion that he has devolved into a slugging OF with high strike out numbers. 

Over the last two seasons he has struck out in 38% of his ABs against LHP. (Higher than, although comparable to, Granderson&#039;s rate of 33%)

He may still be an asset - he carried the Brewers in the first month or so this year. But after the All Star break he was worthless...against righties &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; lefties. 

I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing him in Detroit...but he had better come cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BobS &#8211; </p>
<p>You have to consider that Jenkins&#8217; career success against lefties is heavily skewed towards the early part of his career. In his first 6 years he hit .268 against lefties. </p>
<p>In his last 4 years, his avg against LHP is .211. And if you take out his career year in 2005 that I mentioned earlier, it&#8217;s only .190. </p>
<p>The fact that his HR pace against LHP has actually increased over time just points towards my assertion that he has devolved into a slugging OF with high strike out numbers. </p>
<p>Over the last two seasons he has struck out in 38% of his ABs against LHP. (Higher than, although comparable to, Granderson&#8217;s rate of 33%)</p>
<p>He may still be an asset &#8211; he carried the Brewers in the first month or so this year. But after the All Star break he was worthless&#8230;against righties <i>or</i> lefties. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing him in Detroit&#8230;but he had better come cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
