<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-10-23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72710</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think he&#039;s worth $5-6 million but I agree, he&#039;d be a solid platooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s worth $5-6 million but I agree, he&#8217;d be a solid platooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72680</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72680</guid>
		<description>I think Jenkins would make a nice platoon partner for Thames, and is generally well regarded defensively.  I don&#039;t think you get him for $3 million, but $5-6 million for 1 to 2 years would be palatable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jenkins would make a nice platoon partner for Thames, and is generally well regarded defensively.  I don&#8217;t think you get him for $3 million, but $5-6 million for 1 to 2 years would be palatable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72679</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72679</guid>
		<description>Count me out on Geoff Jenkins unless he&#039;s making drastically less then what he was in Milwaukee. I&#039;m talking $3 million or less.

Solid article all around but nothing ground breaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me out on Geoff Jenkins unless he&#8217;s making drastically less then what he was in Milwaukee. I&#8217;m talking $3 million or less.</p>
<p>Solid article all around but nothing ground breaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobS.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72675</link>
		<dc:creator>BobS.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72675</guid>
		<description>Sad to read that Curtis Granderson isn&#039;t using winter ball to at least learn how to drag bunt against left handers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to read that Curtis Granderson isn&#8217;t using winter ball to at least learn how to drag bunt against left handers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72671</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72671</guid>
		<description>I duno my list would look like this

Tigers
my other fav mlb teams
rest of mlb
--------------
football




--------------
every other sport

if he is going off of &quot;wins&quot; like he says MLB should be above everyone else anyways considering most teams that have been around for awhile have at least 8000 wins... ;)

seriously though rating baseball teams against basketball against football is silly enough without forgetting hockey and other team-sports not to mention tennis/golf =P

the great people at ESPN/Yahoo/SI etc. have enough trouble ranking players and doing their &quot;power rankings&quot; year-by-yeaer correctly now we are trying to go across sports?

Ugh.  Can you say waste of time?

Yes it&#039;s ironic that I wasted time saying all of this when you probably already know that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I duno my list would look like this</p>
<p>Tigers<br />
my other fav mlb teams<br />
rest of mlb<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
football</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
every other sport</p>
<p>if he is going off of &#8220;wins&#8221; like he says MLB should be above everyone else anyways considering most teams that have been around for awhile have at least 8000 wins&#8230; <img src='http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>seriously though rating baseball teams against basketball against football is silly enough without forgetting hockey and other team-sports not to mention tennis/golf =P</p>
<p>the great people at ESPN/Yahoo/SI etc. have enough trouble ranking players and doing their &#8220;power rankings&#8221; year-by-yeaer correctly now we are trying to go across sports?</p>
<p>Ugh.  Can you say waste of time?</p>
<p>Yes it&#8217;s ironic that I wasted time saying all of this when you probably already know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72668</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72668</guid>
		<description>Before I read the article, I figured if he didn&#039;t include hockey, it was probably a good thing because he probably didn&#039;t know enough about it to make a judgment. 

But then I saw his system and realized there&#039;s no judgments to be made and thought it was strange he didn&#039;t include it. I wonder if he just didn&#039;t know what to do with the point system hockey uses, which is different from the straight win-loss records of the other sports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I read the article, I figured if he didn&#8217;t include hockey, it was probably a good thing because he probably didn&#8217;t know enough about it to make a judgment. </p>
<p>But then I saw his system and realized there&#8217;s no judgments to be made and thought it was strange he didn&#8217;t include it. I wonder if he just didn&#8217;t know what to do with the point system hockey uses, which is different from the straight win-loss records of the other sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72667</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72667</guid>
		<description>Jason may still have a point. I mean, hockey isn&#039;t really that big nationwide maybe, but it is still a sport ESPN occasionally notices. Barry Melrose anyway. And all regions of the country have teams in the NHL, AHL and probably ECHL. So I&#039;d say that it&#039;s probably popular enough to still be in the big four and should be represented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason may still have a point. I mean, hockey isn&#8217;t really that big nationwide maybe, but it is still a sport ESPN occasionally notices. Barry Melrose anyway. And all regions of the country have teams in the NHL, AHL and probably ECHL. So I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s probably popular enough to still be in the big four and should be represented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rings</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72666</link>
		<dc:creator>Rings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72666</guid>
		<description>Jason, as popular as the NHL is in &quot;Hockeytown,&quot; - and I like hockey, too - the rest of the nation really doesn&#039;t give a hoot. It&#039;s basically a step above a minor league sport.
The other of the &quot;big three&quot; are followed throughout the country and are worth - and generate - many time$ what the NHL is worth.
Thanks for the link, Bilfer...interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, as popular as the NHL is in &#8220;Hockeytown,&#8221; &#8211; and I like hockey, too &#8211; the rest of the nation really doesn&#8217;t give a hoot. It&#8217;s basically a step above a minor league sport.<br />
The other of the &#8220;big three&#8221; are followed throughout the country and are worth &#8211; and generate &#8211; many time$ what the NHL is worth.<br />
Thanks for the link, Bilfer&#8230;interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72664</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72664</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s actually not a bad article by Henning. I haven&#039;t taken a real close look at potential hole-fillers for the Tigers but I know Gleeman liked Jenkins for the Twins and there&#039;s certainly worse advocates for a player to have in his corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually not a bad article by Henning. I haven&#8217;t taken a real close look at potential hole-fillers for the Tigers but I know Gleeman liked Jenkins for the Twins and there&#8217;s certainly worse advocates for a player to have in his corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72663</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72663</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t even think of Geoff Jenkins as an option, sounds like a pretty good fit to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even think of Geoff Jenkins as an option, sounds like a pretty good fit to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/10/links-for-2007-10-23/#comment-72661</guid>
		<description>How can NHL teams not be on the franchise ranking? Disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can NHL teams not be on the franchise ranking? Disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

