The Detroit Tiger Weblog



« | »

Game 149: Tigers at Twins

PREGAME: Perennial Cy Young contender against guy making his first start. This is one of those games you hope to steal.

The Tigers have faced Johan Santana 4 times this year. And while it hasn’t been easy in any start, they haven’t been completely stymied either. His last start against the Tigers he allowed 3 runs on 5 hits while fanning 7 in 8 innings. The Tigers are loading up the lineup with righties as Ryan Raburn leads off and Marcus Thames makes the start at first base with Brent Clevlen getting an outfield start.

For the Tigers it will be Yorman Bazardo, acquired from the Seattle Mariners for Jeff Frazier. If Bazardo goes on to have success with the Tigers, it will be another instance of Jeff Weaver giving back to the organization. Bazardo was DFA’d to make room for Weaver when the Mariners signed him this offseason. Bazardo’s K rates aren’t particularly impressive with only 4.54/9 for Toledo this year, and 5.36/9 in his minor league career. But he does keep the ball in the park and doesn’t walk a whole lot.

Game Time 7:10 p.m.
DET @ MIN, Saturday, September 15, 2007 Game Preview – Baseball-Reference.com

POSTGAME: The Tigers won! The Yankees lost! The deficit is 2.5 games, which for some reason seems much more palatable than 3.5 did earlier this morning. Of course it could very well be back North of 3 games again tomorrow, but for the time being we’ve got ourselves a race.

The Tigers jumped out early on Johan Santana taking advantage of Carlos Guillen bloop hit and a Pudge Rodriguez baggie blast. It looked like it might be a relatively short night for Santana as the Tigers forced him to throw 45 pitches in the first 2 innings. That was the good news because Santana only needed 25 pitches to get through the next 3 innings as he clearly settled in.

The Twins kept things uncomfortable plating a run on a wild pitch, and turning a double, a fly ball, and a ground out into their second run. Bazardo was solid, but came up one out short of qualifying for the win. Actually, it was one strike away as he went up 0-2 on Jason Kubel and after a foul ball Bazardo widely missed the zone with 4 straight pitches.

The bullpen was mostly solid as Bobby Seay pitched a scoreless inning fanning 2. Joel Zumaya went 1 2/3 getting a double play on his first pitch and having an easy 1-2-3 8th. Todd Jones issued a 2 out walk, but the 9th was otherwise unavailable. The only blemish was Zach Miner’s outing, which would have been fine if not for that PFP stuff. A one out ground ball single by Nick Punto, a steal, and a walk had 2 men on. Miner got the comebacker to the mound, threw high to second pulling Santiago, who threw late to first, meanwhile Punto scored. A double play ball resulted in no outs and a run.

A win is a win and the Tigers are at the very least keeping the pressure on the Yankees and keeping Detroiters interested. A second straight sweep in the Metrodome is a lot to ask for, but when the rookie beats Cy Young, anything seems possible.

Posted by on September 15, 2007.

Categories: 2007 Season, Game Post

55 Responses

  1. Check this out – Santana vs. Tigs

    http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/pl.....gcLNeFCLcF

    Inge Maggs and Poly got to him this year, only 3ab for raburn but a double, maybe leyland thinks thames might run into a santana changeup, althought shef hasn’t do ne well this year he is 8-25 career with an .850 OPS

    by David on Sep 15, 2007 at 6:00 pm

  2. I wager the Yankees lose today.. and so do we. No gain. Prove me wrong, Tigers!

    by JML on Sep 15, 2007 at 6:43 pm

  3. Looks like the BoSox are doing their part and beating the Yankees. C’mon boys…. knock one down.

    by TB on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:05 pm

  4. Fox is inherently evil… and this proves it.

    by Bobby on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:06 pm

  5. Nice start.

    by Kevin in Austin on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:19 pm

  6. Nice, nice, nice.

    by Kevin in Austin on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:21 pm

  7. I wish I could actually watch what is going on….

    by boombotti on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:21 pm

  8. Johan Santana? Really?

    by todd on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:24 pm

  9. Don’t count us out

    by David on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:26 pm

  10. Just tuning in and the score is 4-0? Good luck, Yorman!

    by Kathy on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:29 pm

  11. Jeez… switch the game.

    by Dylan on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:29 pm

  12. As much as I enjoy watching the Yankees get spanked, this is infuriating. Grrrr…..

    by Tbone on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:30 pm

  13. Jeepers – if Brent Clevelen is getting base hits off Santana, this just might be a good day!

    by Tbone on Sep 15, 2007 at 7:37 pm

  14. What a bizarre inning!

    by Kathy on Sep 15, 2007 at 8:24 pm

  15. This is not good. Yorman is not going to cut it.

    by Kathy on Sep 15, 2007 at 8:33 pm

  16. We’re gonna need some more runs. I’d say three more to ensure the W.

    by T Smith on Sep 15, 2007 at 8:37 pm

  17. Bazardo out of the game bottom of the 5th, 2 out with 1 on 1st. Seay coming in for anybody out there not able to see or hear the game.

    by Kathy on Sep 15, 2007 at 8:39 pm

  18. Seay has been insanly impressive this year…

    by Jim on Sep 15, 2007 at 8:59 pm

  19. INGE!!! =) DOUBLE

    by David on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:08 pm

  20. Wow… If every pitch that was trown to Inge was from Santana, it would be as if he is Babe Ruth or Ted Willams…

    by Chris on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:11 pm

  21. Zach Miner: grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    by Kathy on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:25 pm

  22. Eisch…how did we not get ONE out of that one?

    by Mike in CT on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:28 pm

  23. Zoom!

    by Mike in CT on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:28 pm

  24. Awsome… One pitch DP

    by Chris on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:29 pm

  25. phew….. too close for comfort there boys (-:

    by feilong80 on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:30 pm

  26. Insurance run…please…or eight.

    by Mike in CT on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:31 pm

  27. Zoom zoom 1-2-3!

    by feilong80 on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:43 pm

  28. Santana has pitched like the god he is… It is an amazing fortune that the Tigers were able to sneak in those four runs before he got his mojo back.

    by Chris on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:43 pm

  29. At least Pudge moved the runner up. Wouldn’t a bunt have been in order there? Still, job accomplished.

    by Mike in CT on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:46 pm

  30. Why did he not pinch hit Timo?

    by Chris on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:52 pm

  31. ..OK, we,ve got just three outs to go…. It’s that vast wasteland known as the Twins bottom order.. Lets not blow it

    by Chris on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:55 pm

  32. two-out walk…please no more.

    by Mike in CT on Sep 15, 2007 at 10:03 pm

  33. two and a half back…that’s striking distance folks. gotta win tomorrow afternoon and make the yankees sweat it out at night.

    by Mike in CT on Sep 15, 2007 at 10:05 pm

  34. You really have to give our guys credit. They are making it interesting!

    by feilong80 on Sep 15, 2007 at 10:31 pm

  35. I sure haven’t given up on them. Hope they fight and scrabble right down to the last game.

    by Kathy on Sep 15, 2007 at 10:40 pm

  36. it’s still fun! Nerve-wracking, but fun!

    by tiff on Sep 15, 2007 at 11:16 pm

  37. Wonderful, wonderful…we still have a small chance…but it’s a chance!

    by Rings on Sep 15, 2007 at 11:33 pm

  38. i would love the tigers to catch the yanks and then call into WFAN and do a verbal celeb dance around their know it all hosts….

    by Stephen on Sep 15, 2007 at 11:38 pm

  39. You mean Mike and the Maddog. I loved their spin last year. It was quite enjoyable listening to them throughout the ALDS.

    Stephen, I think you’re the perfect person to take them to the carpet. Of course the Tigers have to catch them first.

    by T Smith on Sep 15, 2007 at 11:43 pm

  40. That is to say, I loved listening to their confounded analysis and backpeddling antics after the second game of the ALDS. I wrote an entire piece last year about Mike and the Maddog and how wrong they were in their analysis of the ALDS (Yankees in Two). I can’t remember if I posted it here, but I really should have published it elsewhere just to humilate them.

    by T Smith on Sep 16, 2007 at 12:00 am

  41. The relief guys are coming thru big time. Who woulda thought.

    by ron on Sep 16, 2007 at 12:12 am

  42. They have to catch them AND win the World Series or this year is a failure.

    by ron on Sep 16, 2007 at 12:15 am

  43. As we can see in this series, the Twins are beginning the decline in a big way. The writing is on that wall that this team better dive into rebuilding mode sooner rather than later.

    I look for them to trade Santana this next winter. He is going to be a free agent after ’08 and will surely be too expensive for the tight pockets.

    Here’s a thought: if that were to happen, would there be any possibility the Tigers could get into the bidding? What would it cost, and would it be worth giving up a big time prospect (such as Maybin) for only one year of Santana?

    by Chris on Sep 16, 2007 at 12:56 am

  44. “They have to catch them AND win the World Series or this year is a failure.”

    I’m not sure if you’re joking or not. I personally don’t hold the Tigers to THAT high of a standard. Not making the playoffs this year with the team they have would be a disappointment, but I wouldn’t even call it a failure since they’re at least in the race.

    If the Tigers get in the playoffs, regardless of how they do, then I call the season a success.

    by JMD on Sep 16, 2007 at 8:03 am

  45. Hey TSmith….

    Here is a youtube of Mike and Maddog the day after the yankees lose the ALCS.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We7d2jss5KM

    by TB on Sep 16, 2007 at 8:21 am

  46. Chris..re: Santana…I don’t think there is any way that they woudl trade him within the division.

    When he is a free agent, I would obviously love the idea of signing him, but I am sure it will be NYY, BOS, NYM, etc.

    by William on Sep 16, 2007 at 8:40 am

  47. ron,you think you might be setting the bar kind of high?I agree with JMD,making the playoffs in any pro sport makes the season something more than a failure(and for the Lions,a reason to declare a local holiday and shut down the city for a parade).
    Chris,I think you might too quick to dismiss the Twins.They were bitten by the injury bug this year(Liriano,Mauer,and a couple of pieces of their strong bullpen,Crain and Reyes)and for some inexplicable reason got rid of their very competent lead-off hitter mid-season.They’re a team that always seems to do more with less and their farm system has been consistently productive.I agree they have some big decisions to be making the next couple of years with Hunter,Nathan,and Santana and I think the Tigers should do their part to weaken a division rival by overbidding for Nathan and letting Todd Jones walk.

    by BobS. on Sep 16, 2007 at 8:53 am

  48. TB:

    Thanks for the YouTube link. Thoroughy moronic. Here’s a litte response to that specific episode:

    ….To underscore this point, we need only look at Fransescas’s game-three analysis of the series. This was the one “shoe-in” win for the Yankees, based on Fransesca’s understanding of Kenny Rogers, ex-New York hurler set to pitch the pivotal game for the Tigers. Again Fransesca’s miscalculation was not without analysis. He and others like him did have considerable experience seeing Kenny Rogers up close in regular season games and in playoff situations, when Rogers had pitched both for the Yankees and for the Mets from 1996-2000. And Rogers stunk. The stats from ten years ago don’t lie. Forget about his 17 posted wins this season, forget about his impressive ERA this season, and forget about his sub-2.00 run ERA the last few games he pitched in 2006. When Rogers pitched in New York, he stunk. Period. Moreover, his overall track record against Yankee bats was atrocious. Bottom line: it was a foregone conclusion that Rogers would stink in game three and the Yankees would win.
    Again, the folly of this analysis is colossal. Did Fransesca even bother to look at the reason Rogers was able to win 17 games for the Tigers during the regular season (much more recent history than his performances that ran him out of town on a rail)? Did Fransesca even bother to pull up Roger’s track record during the 2006 season against the Chicago White Sox, a divisional foe of the Tigers and a slugging team on par or arguably better than the New York Yankees? If he did, he would have discovered that Kenny Rogers absolutely dominated the Chicago White Sox, just like he dominated the Yankees in game three of the ALDS. Just ask Ozzie Guillen (Chicago White Sox skipper) about Kenny Rogers if you want the real story. And the real story is simple. A veteran pitcher like Kenny Rogers, never known for being a hard thrower to begin with, must rely on continually developing and improving his pitches. He must rely on being crafty, on keeping hitters off balance, and on simply out-pitching opponents. He must also succeed at this quest if he is to continue pitching in the Big Leagues. If he doesn’t do these things well, and continually improve at these things, he simply does not advance his pitching career (certainly not to age 41), and he certainly does not pull off 17 wins at forty-one years of age. Just ask Al Leiter. He was that kind of pitcher. Like Rogers, Leiter was the kind of pitcher who actually improves with age. But no matter. This point is completely lost on Fransesca and friends who know only of Kenny Rogers, vintage 1996-2000, and who didn’t even bother to try to understand how it might be possible that Rogers recorded 17 wins this year, and for a playoff team no less. I need say no more about Kenny Rogers. Let his performance in game three speak for itself.
    Fransesca and crew will eat humble pie this winter because they simply did not see the train wreak coming. It was heading directly toward them faster than Joel Zumaya’s 103-mile-per hour fastball, the same fastball that mowed down the heart of George Steinbrenner’s 220 million dollar prized batting order. In the aftermath of picking up the pieces from the crash, one thing is certain. I don’t think Mike Fransesca will ever claim any future-postseason-series victory as a foregone conclusion, even if the New York Yankees do happen to face the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, or, God help them, the Kansas City Royals during the last three games of their regular season with the division title on the line….

    by T Smith on Sep 16, 2007 at 10:44 am

  49. TB:

    Thanks for the YouTube link. Thoroughly moronic. Here’s a little response to comments made in that specific episode:

    ….To underscore this point, we need only look at Fransescas’s game-three analysis of the series. This was the one “shoe-in” win for the Yankees, based on Fransesca’s understanding of Kenny Rogers, ex-New York hurler set to pitch the pivotal game for the Tigers. Again Fransesca’s miscalculation was not without analysis. He and others like him did have considerable experience seeing Kenny Rogers up close in regular season games and in playoff situations, when Rogers had pitched both for the Yankees and for the Mets from 1996-2000. And Rogers stunk. The stats from ten years ago don’t lie. Forget about his 17 posted wins this season, forget about his impressive ERA this season, and forget about his sub-2.00 run ERA the last few games he pitched in 2006. When Rogers pitched in New York, he stunk. Period. Moreover, his overall track record against Yankee bats was atrocious. Bottom line: it was a foregone conclusion that Rogers would stink in game three and the Yankees would win.
    Again, the folly of this analysis is colossal. Did Fransesca even bother to look at the reason Rogers was able to win 17 games for the Tigers during the regular season (much more recent history than his performances that ran him out of town on a rail)? Did Fransesca even bother to pull up Roger’s track record during the 2006 season against the Chicago White Sox, a divisional foe of the Tigers and a slugging team on par or arguably better than the New York Yankees? If he did, he would have discovered that Kenny Rogers absolutely dominated the Chicago White Sox, just like he dominated the Yankees in game three of the ALDS. Just ask Ozzie Guillen (Chicago White Sox skipper) about Kenny Rogers if you want the real story. And the real story is simple. A veteran pitcher like Kenny Rogers, never known for being a hard thrower to begin with, must rely on continually developing and improving his pitches. He must rely on being crafty, on keeping hitters off balance, and on simply out-pitching opponents. He must also succeed at this quest if he is to continue pitching in the Big Leagues. If he doesn’t do these things well, and continually improve at these things, he simply does not advance his pitching career (certainly not to age 41), and he certainly does not pull off 17 wins at forty-one years of age. Just ask Al Leiter. He was that kind of pitcher. Like Rogers, Leiter was the kind of pitcher who actually improves with age. But no matter. This point is completely lost on Fransesca and friends who know only of Kenny Rogers, vintage 1996-2000, and who didn’t even bother to try to understand how it might be possible that Rogers recorded 17 wins this year, and for a playoff team no less. I need say no more about Kenny Rogers. Let his performance in game three speak for itself.
    Fransesca and crew will eat humble pie this winter because they simply did not see the train wreak coming. It was heading directly toward them faster than Joel Zumaya’s 103-mile-per hour fastball, the same fastball that mowed down the heart of George Steinbrenner’s 220 million dollar prized batting order. In the aftermath of picking up the pieces from the crash, one thing is certain. I don’t think Mike Fransesca will ever claim any future-postseason-series victory as a foregone conclusion, even if the New York Yankees do happen to face the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, or, God help them, the Kansas City Royals during the last three games of their regular season with the division title on the line….

    by T Smith on Sep 16, 2007 at 10:47 am

  50. TB:

    Thanks for the YouTube link. Thoroughly moronic. Here’s a response to comments made on that specific episode…

    “….To underscore this point, we need only look at Fransescas’s game-three analysis of the series. This was the one “shoe-in” win for the Yankees, based on Fransesca’s understanding of Kenny Rogers, ex-New York hurler set to pitch the pivotal game for the Tigers. Again Fransesca’s miscalculation was not without analysis. He and others like him did have considerable experience seeing Kenny Rogers up close in regular season games and in playoff situations, when Rogers had pitched both for the Yankees and for the Mets from 1996-2000. And Rogers stunk. The stats from ten years ago don’t lie. Forget about his 17 posted wins this season, forget about his impressive ERA this season, and forget about his sub-2.00 run ERA the last few games he pitched in 2006. When Rogers pitched in New York, he stunk. Period. Moreover, his overall track record against Yankee bats was atrocious. Bottom line: it was a foregone conclusion that Rogers would stink in game three and the Yankees would win.
    Again, the folly of this analysis is colossal. Did Fransesca even bother to look at the reason Rogers was able to win 17 games for the Tigers during the regular season (much more recent history than his performances that ran him out of town on a rail)? Did Fransesca even bother to pull up Roger’s track record during the 2006 season against the Chicago White Sox, a divisional foe of the Tigers and a slugging team on par or arguably better than the New York Yankees? If he did, he would have discovered that Kenny Rogers absolutely dominated the Chicago White Sox, just like he dominated the Yankees in game three of the ALDS. Just ask Ozzie Guillen (Chicago White Sox skipper) about Kenny Rogers if you want the real story. And the real story is simple. A veteran pitcher like Kenny Rogers, never known for being a hard thrower to begin with, must rely on continually developing and improving his pitches. He must rely on being crafty, on keeping hitters off balance, and on simply out-pitching opponents. He must also succeed at this quest if he is to continue pitching in the Big Leagues. If he doesn’t do these things well, and continually improve at these things, he simply does not advance his pitching career (certainly not to age 41), and he certainly does not pull off 17 wins at forty-one years of age. Just ask Al Leiter. He was that kind of pitcher. Like Rogers, Leiter was the kind of pitcher who actually improves with age. But no matter. This point is completely lost on Fransesca and friends who know only of Kenny Rogers, vintage 1996-2000, and who didn’t even bother to try to understand how it might be possible that Rogers recorded 17 wins this year, and for a playoff team no less. I need say no more about Kenny Rogers. Let his performance in game three speak for itself.
    Fransesca and crew will eat humble pie this winter because they simply did not see the train wreak coming. It was heading directly toward them faster than Joel Zumaya’s 103-mile-per hour fastball, the same fastball that mowed down the heart of George Steinbrenner’s 220 million dollar prized batting order. In the aftermath of picking up the pieces from the crash, one thing is certain. I don’t think Mike Fransesca will ever claim any future-postseason-series victory as a foregone conclusion, even if the New York Yankees do happen to face the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, or, God help them, the Kansas City Royals during the last three games of their regular season with the division title on the line….”

    by T Smith on Sep 16, 2007 at 10:49 am

  51. TB:

    Thanks for the YouTube link. Thoroughly moronic. Here’s a little response to comments made on that specific episode:

    “…To underscore this point, we need only look at Fransescas’s game-three analysis of the series. This was the one “shoe-in” win for the Yankees, based on Fransesca’s understanding of Kenny Rogers, ex-New York hurler set to pitch the pivotal game for the Tigers. Again Fransesca’s miscalculation was not without analysis. He and others like him did have considerable experience seeing Kenny Rogers up close in regular season games and in playoff situations, when Rogers had pitched both for the Yankees and for the Mets from 1996-2000. And Rogers stunk. The stats from ten years ago don’t lie. Forget about his 17 posted wins this season, forget about his impressive ERA this season, and forget about his sub-2.00 run ERA the last few games he pitched in 2006. When Rogers pitched in New York, he stunk. Period. Moreover, his overall track record against Yankee bats was atrocious. Bottom line: it was a foregone conclusion that Rogers would stink in game three and the Yankees would win.
    Again, the folly of this analysis is colossal. Did Fransesca even bother to look at the reason Rogers was able to win 17 games for the Tigers during the regular season (much more recent history than his performances that ran him out of town on a rail)? Did Fransesca even bother to pull up Roger’s track record during the 2006 season against the Chicago White Sox, a divisional foe of the Tigers and a slugging team on par or arguably better than the New York Yankees? If he did, he would have discovered that Kenny Rogers absolutely dominated the Chicago White Sox, just like he dominated the Yankees in game three of the ALDS. Just ask Ozzie Guillen (Chicago White Sox skipper) about Kenny Rogers if you want the real story. And the real story is simple. A veteran pitcher like Kenny Rogers, never known for being a hard thrower to begin with, must rely on continually developing and improving his pitches. He must rely on being crafty, on keeping hitters off balance, and on simply out-pitching opponents. He must also succeed at this quest if he is to continue pitching in the Big Leagues. If he doesn’t do these things well, and continually improve at these things, he simply does not advance his pitching career (certainly not to age 41), and he certainly does not pull off 17 wins at forty-one years of age. Just ask Al Leiter. He was that kind of pitcher. Like Rogers, Leiter was the kind of pitcher who actually improves with age. But no matter. This point is completely lost on Fransesca and friends who know only of Kenny Rogers, vintage 1996-2000, and who didn’t even bother to try to understand how it might be possible that Rogers recorded 17 wins this year, and for a playoff team no less. I need say no more about Kenny Rogers. Let his performance in game three speak for itself.
    Fransesca and crew will eat humble pie this winter because they simply did not see the train wreak coming. It was heading directly toward them faster than Joel Zumaya’s 103-mile-per hour fastball, the same fastball that mowed down the heart of George Steinbrenner’s 220 million dollar prized batting order. In the aftermath of picking up the pieces from the crash, one thing is certain. I don’t think Mike Fransesca will ever claim any future-postseason-series victory as a foregone conclusion, even if the New York Yankees do happen to face the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, or, God help them, the Kansas City Royals during the last three games of their regular season with the division title on the line…”

    by T Smith on Sep 16, 2007 at 10:52 am

  52. TB:

    Thanks for the YouTube link. Thoroughly moronic. Here’s a little response to comments made in that specific episode:

    “….To underscore this point, we need only look at Fransescas’s game-three analysis of the series. This was the one “shoe-in” win for the Yankees, based on Fransesca’s understanding of Kenny Rogers, ex-New York hurler set to pitch the pivotal game for the Tigers. Again Fransesca’s miscalculation was not without analysis. He and others like him did have considerable experience seeing Kenny Rogers up close in regular season games and in playoff situations, when Rogers had pitched both for the Yankees and for the Mets from 1996-2000. And Rogers stunk. The stats from ten years ago don’t lie. Forget about his 17 posted wins this season, forget about his impressive ERA this season, and forget about his sub-2.00 run ERA the last few games he pitched in 2006. When Rogers pitched in New York, he stunk. Period. Moreover, his overall track record against Yankee bats was atrocious. Bottom line: it was a foregone conclusion that Rogers would stink in game three and the Yankees would win.
    Again, the folly of this analysis is colossal. Did Fransesca even bother to look at the reason Rogers was able to win 17 games for the Tigers during the regular season (much more recent history than his performances that ran him out of town on a rail)? Did Fransesca even bother to pull up Roger’s track record during the 2006 season against the Chicago White Sox, a divisional foe of the Tigers and a slugging team on par or arguably better than the New York Yankees? If he did, he would have discovered that Kenny Rogers absolutely dominated the Chicago White Sox, just like he dominated the Yankees in game three of the ALDS. Just ask Ozzie Guillen (Chicago White Sox skipper) about Kenny Rogers if you want the real story. And the real story is simple. A veteran pitcher like Kenny Rogers, never known for being a hard thrower to begin with, must rely on continually developing and improving his pitches. He must rely on being crafty, on keeping hitters off balance, and on simply out-pitching opponents. He must also succeed at this quest if he is to continue pitching in the Big Leagues. If he doesn’t do these things well, and continually improve at these things, he simply does not advance his pitching career (certainly not to age 41), and he certainly does not pull off 17 wins at forty-one years of age. Just ask Al Leiter. He was that kind of pitcher. Like Rogers, Leiter was the kind of pitcher who actually improves with age. But no matter. This point is completely lost on Fransesca and friends who know only of Kenny Rogers, vintage 1996-2000, and who didn’t even bother to try to understand how it might be possible that Rogers recorded 17 wins this year, and for a playoff team no less. I need say no more about Kenny Rogers. Let his performance in game three speak for itself.
    Fransesca and crew will eat humble pie this winter because they simply did not see the train wreak coming. It was heading directly toward them faster than Joel Zumaya’s 103-mile-per hour fastball, the same fastball that mowed down the heart of George Steinbrenner’s 220 million dollar prized batting order. In the aftermath of picking up the pieces from the crash, one thing is certain. I don’t think Mike Fransesca will ever claim any future-postseason-series victory as a foregone conclusion, even if the New York Yankees do happen to face the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, or, God help them, the Kansas City Royals during the last three games of their regular season with the division title on the line.”

    by T Smith on Sep 16, 2007 at 11:23 am

  53. BobS, yes they had injuries. But mostly to a pitching staff that was pretty good anyhow. The biggest shortcoming of the team has to do with offensive production with a lineup that was pretty healthy. And that lineup is going to get weaker with the immanent departure of Tory Hunter. This team has to rebuild and they better get started on that soon so they can get a good for the opening of the new stadium in 2010. I think that this is in their plans and is revealed by the fact that they traded Castilio while being not too far out of contention (remember how this puzzled and angered Santana).

    Trading Santana would be a good move. They could get a very good prospect who could be developed into a star by 2010, and by that point, Santana would be long gone anyway.

    And would they not trade Santana to a division opponent? Well if they did, they would only be trading him for next year– a year in which they would be rebuilding anyway. Say if they traded him to the Tigers, by 2009 he could bolt as a high priced free agent to the Mets.

    by Chris on Sep 16, 2007 at 11:25 am

  54. Why trade when we can take by free agency.Mike Illich has shown a willingness to spend on his sports teams(if not the stadiums they play in,in which he is a beneficiary of the generous welfare we bestow upon the rich,which is to say all pro sports team owners,including Minnesota,where public money being used to build a new stadium is somewhat controversial given the recent tragedy there).
    I’m not sold on Maybin based on what I’ve seen so far,but I’m willing to trust the judgement of better baseball minds than my own and consider him likely a future star and cornerstone of this organization.Given that,I don’t know that I’d part with him under the terms you describe,i.e. one year of Santana,especially considering we’d have to watch anyone we give up for him 18 times a year.Maybe a sign and trade where we’d be assured of the services of Santana for a few years.

    by BobS. on Sep 16, 2007 at 12:17 pm

  55. If we make it to the playoffs, I would consider this year very much a success considering all that’s happened.

    My only concern, not really a concern, is if we will ever see Magglio as magnificent as he has been this year. I mean will he ever be able to put together a season as productive as this one. It’s been so special.

    by Kathy on Sep 16, 2007 at 12:40 pm

« | »




Recent Posts


Pages



About The Detroit Tiger Weblog

About the Site Detroit Tigers Weblog was launched in July, 2001. At the time it was the only Tigers blog and it resided as a blogspot page. There were multiple authors and it mostly consisted of links to the rare times the Tigers were mentioned in the national media. We only had a few dozen […]more →

Switch to our desktop site