<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 69:  Tigers at Nationals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57767</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57767</guid>
		<description>&quot;We are not trading Maybin for bullpen parts.&quot;

Especially since we ALREADY HAVE the pitchers we need in the minors, as the vast majority of relievers are just converted starters anyway.  Eulogio&#039;s probably a good first step in making the transition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We are not trading Maybin for bullpen parts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Especially since we ALREADY HAVE the pitchers we need in the minors, as the vast majority of relievers are just converted starters anyway.  Eulogio&#8217;s probably a good first step in making the transition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave from 'The ATL'</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57766</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave from 'The ATL'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57766</guid>
		<description>Marshall in DC,

It&#039;s the same here in Atlanta.  I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how many Tiger fans are at Turner field this weekend.  

It was more like an away game for the Braves last night with Boston in town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall in DC,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same here in Atlanta.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how many Tiger fans are at Turner field this weekend.  </p>
<p>It was more like an away game for the Braves last night with Boston in town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Nashville</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57765</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Nashville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57765</guid>
		<description>Dave from the ATL....that is the rotation....at least I know Verlander is going Sunday...maybe Maroth gets traded before Sunday...but I highly doubt it, so he&#039;ll probably go on SNB and audition again...let&#039;s hope he has a better one than he did last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave from the ATL&#8230;.that is the rotation&#8230;.at least I know Verlander is going Sunday&#8230;maybe Maroth gets traded before Sunday&#8230;but I highly doubt it, so he&#8217;ll probably go on SNB and audition again&#8230;let&#8217;s hope he has a better one than he did last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57763</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57763</guid>
		<description>On a completely different topic, anyone else think De La looked amazing for someone too nervous to get his fastball within a foot of the plate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a completely different topic, anyone else think De La looked amazing for someone too nervous to get his fastball within a foot of the plate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57762</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57762</guid>
		<description>Trading Maybin makes no sense when we have  two of the three most desired trade deadline commodities in spades - experienced power bats and starting pitching.  With all the attention that the terrible Adam Dunn is getting, the teams that don&#039;t get him could get a player with slightly less power but also much better defense and speed (plus a couple fewer strikeouts) in C-Mo (Oakland, San Diego, St. Louis, Anaheim).  Plus Shelton is just sitting in AAA, being a good soldier and waiting for a chance.  It&#039;d be the best thing for all parties to get rid of him.  On the pitching side, packaging two semi-expendable starters (from Maroth, Durbin, and Ledezma) should be enough to get pen help from a team desperate for starters (Braves, Rangers, Royals, M&#039;s).  Jones is probably the closer for the year, but one more quality 7th-8th inning guy would make all the difference.  Even beyond all that, I still think a Rodney/Shelton (if he&#039;s willing get back to catching and replace Ausmus) for Lidge trade makes sense for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trading Maybin makes no sense when we have  two of the three most desired trade deadline commodities in spades &#8211; experienced power bats and starting pitching.  With all the attention that the terrible Adam Dunn is getting, the teams that don&#8217;t get him could get a player with slightly less power but also much better defense and speed (plus a couple fewer strikeouts) in C-Mo (Oakland, San Diego, St. Louis, Anaheim).  Plus Shelton is just sitting in AAA, being a good soldier and waiting for a chance.  It&#8217;d be the best thing for all parties to get rid of him.  On the pitching side, packaging two semi-expendable starters (from Maroth, Durbin, and Ledezma) should be enough to get pen help from a team desperate for starters (Braves, Rangers, Royals, M&#8217;s).  Jones is probably the closer for the year, but one more quality 7th-8th inning guy would make all the difference.  Even beyond all that, I still think a Rodney/Shelton (if he&#8217;s willing get back to catching and replace Ausmus) for Lidge trade makes sense for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motor City Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57761</link>
		<dc:creator>Motor City Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57761</guid>
		<description>Arrrgghhhh!!!

Tigers Good.

Jones Baaaad.

Ba-bye Jonesy.

(wishful thinking)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrrgghhhh!!!</p>
<p>Tigers Good.</p>
<p>Jones Baaaad.</p>
<p>Ba-bye Jonesy.</p>
<p>(wishful thinking)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave from 'The ATL'</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57760</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave from 'The ATL'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57760</guid>
		<description>Is the starting pitching line-up set for the Tigers versus Braves?  I know Kenny&#039;s making his come back on Friday versus Smoltz but what about Saturday and Sunday?  

Is Leyland sticking with the current rotation with Verlander on Saturday and Maroth on Sunday?

I&#039;m fired-up I&#039;ll be at both games on Saturday and Sunday bot on national TV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the starting pitching line-up set for the Tigers versus Braves?  I know Kenny&#8217;s making his come back on Friday versus Smoltz but what about Saturday and Sunday?  </p>
<p>Is Leyland sticking with the current rotation with Verlander on Saturday and Maroth on Sunday?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fired-up I&#8217;ll be at both games on Saturday and Sunday bot on national TV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57758</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57758</guid>
		<description>We are not trading Maybin for bullpen parts.

You just dont trade a top 10 toolsy OF prospect for a bullpen arm.

We are also not trading De La Cruz for a bullpen arm. More likely he will be a big part of the pen from here on out. I really think he and Bazardo will.

Who we may trade for bullpen help:
Tata, Vazquez, Trahern, Jurrjens, Sizemore or Kirkland
If anyone is interested: Shelton also</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not trading Maybin for bullpen parts.</p>
<p>You just dont trade a top 10 toolsy OF prospect for a bullpen arm.</p>
<p>We are also not trading De La Cruz for a bullpen arm. More likely he will be a big part of the pen from here on out. I really think he and Bazardo will.</p>
<p>Who we may trade for bullpen help:<br />
Tata, Vazquez, Trahern, Jurrjens, Sizemore or Kirkland<br />
If anyone is interested: Shelton also</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall in DC</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57757</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57757</guid>
		<description>First and foremost  . . fun game. Especially because I was in section 421 right behind home plate at RFK. Couple of notes before I get to the Game. If, over the last 15 years, you wonder where the Detroit Population has moved off to, DC seem to be a great answer. At leat 30% of the fans in RFK last night were rooting for the Tigers. Even our Metro system was resounding with &quot;Let go Tigers&quot; chants before and after the game. Pretty awesome.

It was a Hot and muggy night - at the close of the game the temp was 87 degrees, and muggy. 

My thoughts on the game:
1) Without the benefit of instant replay the Sac Fly in the second looked like an out at home. The Nats Fans actually booed. That got the Home fans really into the game.

2) I told my wife that Maroth leading off in the 6th would be a guaranteed out, and what does he do but hit a double. That opened a can of worms for the nats. I certainly looked like Maroth was stealing signs from his vantage point. Relaying that info into a hitting strategy seemd to be an issue. Never seen the 3rd base coach confir with the Hitter twice between pitches. Paid off though . . . 

3) de la Cruz was amazing. (Gave up one hit and retired the side with 12 pitches) Watching his pitches break from behind home plate was pretty awesome. For the life of me, I never understand why you don&#039;t keep a guy like that into the 9th. Warm Todd Jones up, but let Cruz (who is on a roll) keep going (play the hot hand). If he falters fine, Bring Jones in, but why bench a guy who &quot;Cruzed&quot; through an inning with only 12 pitches.

4) As for Jones  . . .I told everyone around me that the game wasn&#039;t over when he came in, Jones would give up 3 runs and put a man on 3rd before deciding to be a closer and putting the game away. And that is exactly what he did.

Now I can get bitchy about it, but frankly - being in the stands - it made for great theater. Every one was standing cheering. The &quot;Lets go tigers&quot; were rivilng the &quot;Let&#039;s go Nats&quot;. Every one had their rally caps on. So - for personal reasons -I&#039;m gald the Nats made it close, and exciting.  

Over all - fun game, beautiful night, and my Tigs won another game that I attended. 

BTW - Bilfer - One suggestion. You may want to add a thread or link for Tigers Fans at Away Games. Sort of message board for Fans to see who else is going to an away game and meet up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and foremost  . . fun game. Especially because I was in section 421 right behind home plate at RFK. Couple of notes before I get to the Game. If, over the last 15 years, you wonder where the Detroit Population has moved off to, DC seem to be a great answer. At leat 30% of the fans in RFK last night were rooting for the Tigers. Even our Metro system was resounding with &#8220;Let go Tigers&#8221; chants before and after the game. Pretty awesome.</p>
<p>It was a Hot and muggy night &#8211; at the close of the game the temp was 87 degrees, and muggy. </p>
<p>My thoughts on the game:<br />
1) Without the benefit of instant replay the Sac Fly in the second looked like an out at home. The Nats Fans actually booed. That got the Home fans really into the game.</p>
<p>2) I told my wife that Maroth leading off in the 6th would be a guaranteed out, and what does he do but hit a double. That opened a can of worms for the nats. I certainly looked like Maroth was stealing signs from his vantage point. Relaying that info into a hitting strategy seemd to be an issue. Never seen the 3rd base coach confir with the Hitter twice between pitches. Paid off though . . . </p>
<p>3) de la Cruz was amazing. (Gave up one hit and retired the side with 12 pitches) Watching his pitches break from behind home plate was pretty awesome. For the life of me, I never understand why you don&#8217;t keep a guy like that into the 9th. Warm Todd Jones up, but let Cruz (who is on a roll) keep going (play the hot hand). If he falters fine, Bring Jones in, but why bench a guy who &#8220;Cruzed&#8221; through an inning with only 12 pitches.</p>
<p>4) As for Jones  . . .I told everyone around me that the game wasn&#8217;t over when he came in, Jones would give up 3 runs and put a man on 3rd before deciding to be a closer and putting the game away. And that is exactly what he did.</p>
<p>Now I can get bitchy about it, but frankly &#8211; being in the stands &#8211; it made for great theater. Every one was standing cheering. The &#8220;Lets go tigers&#8221; were rivilng the &#8220;Let&#8217;s go Nats&#8221;. Every one had their rally caps on. So &#8211; for personal reasons -I&#8217;m gald the Nats made it close, and exciting.  </p>
<p>Over all &#8211; fun game, beautiful night, and my Tigs won another game that I attended. </p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Bilfer &#8211; One suggestion. You may want to add a thread or link for Tigers Fans at Away Games. Sort of message board for Fans to see who else is going to an away game and meet up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle J</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57755</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57755</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Sam on trying Nate out in the bullpen--maybe even as closer if Jones doesn&#039;t get it together by the All-Star break.  He&#039;s been good in the early innings, has the capacity to pitch out of jams, and could be more of a strikeout pitcher in shorter stretches.  Tell him it&#039;s a one-year thing and he&#039;ll be back in the rotation next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Sam on trying Nate out in the bullpen&#8211;maybe even as closer if Jones doesn&#8217;t get it together by the All-Star break.  He&#8217;s been good in the early innings, has the capacity to pitch out of jams, and could be more of a strikeout pitcher in shorter stretches.  Tell him it&#8217;s a one-year thing and he&#8217;ll be back in the rotation next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57752</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57752</guid>
		<description>one thing about DY that I haven&#039;t heard mentioned: the &#039;03 Tigers would have set the loss record without him.  He hit .297/.372 /.537  in a year when no one else on the roster even slugged .450.  

2003 Detroit Tigers Team Leaders

Batting Average: Young, .297 
On-base %: Young, .372 
Slugging %: Young, .537 
OPS: Young, .909 
Games: Young, 155 
Plate Appearances: Young, 635 
Runs: Young, 78 
Hits: Young, 167 
Total Bases: Young, 302 
Doubles: Young, 34 
Triples: Young, 7 
Home Runs: Young, 29 
RBI: Young, 85 
Hit By Pitch: Young, 11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one thing about DY that I haven&#8217;t heard mentioned: the &#8217;03 Tigers would have set the loss record without him.  He hit .297/.372 /.537  in a year when no one else on the roster even slugged .450.  </p>
<p>2003 Detroit Tigers Team Leaders</p>
<p>Batting Average: Young, .297<br />
On-base %: Young, .372<br />
Slugging %: Young, .537<br />
OPS: Young, .909<br />
Games: Young, 155<br />
Plate Appearances: Young, 635<br />
Runs: Young, 78<br />
Hits: Young, 167<br />
Total Bases: Young, 302<br />
Doubles: Young, 34<br />
Triples: Young, 7<br />
Home Runs: Young, 29<br />
RBI: Young, 85<br />
Hit By Pitch: Young, 11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57751</guid>
		<description>Stephen, there aren&#039;t any 40-save closers and great set up men lying around on terrible teams that are willing to trade these people. Hell, Todd Jones is a 40-save closer.

And you don&#039;t trade away your prospects in an area you&#039;re weak in. And we&#039;re weak in position players in the farm system. We have a dearth of live, young arms that project well. That is what you trade, not Cameron Maybin.

Kevin in Austin: You really want to give up Cameron Maybin for Eric Gagne who&#039;s got a 1 year deal, Akinori Otsuka and Mark Teixeira who we&#039;d only have for a year and a half? I don&#039;t. Again, it&#039;s not like we&#039;ve got a great system of position players stocked like, say, the Angels do. We deal away some of our minor league strengths, which is young, live arms. Not to mention the fact that Teixeira will command a $90+ million dollar long-term contract AND said he&#039;d love to play in Baltimore and essentially that they&#039;ll be the front runners. So then you&#039;re out one reliever if you can&#039;t resign gagne, out your 1st baseman and left with the same problem we just had this passed off-season, and you have a 36 year old &#039;closer&#039; in Otsuka left to show for your top prospect in your system. Might as well throw in Andrew Miller and have a fire sale.

To me, Nate Robertson and Craig Monroe (especially when he heats up in July/August and hits his peak value for the season) is what will bring us the biggest return. This is speaking to only trading our MLB players. Throw in an arm like an Eulogio De La Cruz or Dallas Trahern if we have to, and that&#039;s a pretty attractive offer for, say, Brad Lidge and an Astros team that needs offense (especially from their corner outfield positions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, there aren&#8217;t any 40-save closers and great set up men lying around on terrible teams that are willing to trade these people. Hell, Todd Jones is a 40-save closer.</p>
<p>And you don&#8217;t trade away your prospects in an area you&#8217;re weak in. And we&#8217;re weak in position players in the farm system. We have a dearth of live, young arms that project well. That is what you trade, not Cameron Maybin.</p>
<p>Kevin in Austin: You really want to give up Cameron Maybin for Eric Gagne who&#8217;s got a 1 year deal, Akinori Otsuka and Mark Teixeira who we&#8217;d only have for a year and a half? I don&#8217;t. Again, it&#8217;s not like we&#8217;ve got a great system of position players stocked like, say, the Angels do. We deal away some of our minor league strengths, which is young, live arms. Not to mention the fact that Teixeira will command a $90+ million dollar long-term contract AND said he&#8217;d love to play in Baltimore and essentially that they&#8217;ll be the front runners. So then you&#8217;re out one reliever if you can&#8217;t resign gagne, out your 1st baseman and left with the same problem we just had this passed off-season, and you have a 36 year old &#8216;closer&#8217; in Otsuka left to show for your top prospect in your system. Might as well throw in Andrew Miller and have a fire sale.</p>
<p>To me, Nate Robertson and Craig Monroe (especially when he heats up in July/August and hits his peak value for the season) is what will bring us the biggest return. This is speaking to only trading our MLB players. Throw in an arm like an Eulogio De La Cruz or Dallas Trahern if we have to, and that&#8217;s a pretty attractive offer for, say, Brad Lidge and an Astros team that needs offense (especially from their corner outfield positions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57749</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57749</guid>
		<description>I just calculated Jones ERA and it&#039;s closer to 6, not the 7-8 range I assumed.  Still, it doesn&#039;t cut it.

Even so, I don&#039;t see Leyland or DD making any moves to go after Gagne or somebody like him.  I figure they give Jones a lot more rope to hang himself with... by the time that happens, these discussions may be mute; we may be talking about 2008 by then</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just calculated Jones ERA and it&#8217;s closer to 6, not the 7-8 range I assumed.  Still, it doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
<p>Even so, I don&#8217;t see Leyland or DD making any moves to go after Gagne or somebody like him.  I figure they give Jones a lot more rope to hang himself with&#8230; by the time that happens, these discussions may be mute; we may be talking about 2008 by then</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57748</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57748</guid>
		<description>Joining the discussion late... I&#039;m gonna back up Stephen somewhat here.  Trade Maybin?  Absolutely not.  But we do have to do SOMETHING.  Doing SOMETHING is not a knee-jerk reaction.  It&#039;s correcting a serious problem before we&#039;re 6 games out and in an inevitable spiral.  How many bullpen melt-downs do we need to experience before discussions to rectify the situation no longer qualify as &quot;knee-jerk&quot; reactions?  This bullpen isn&#039;t just gonna just fix itself.  Jones isn&#039;t gonna all of the sudden become a dominant closer.  We&#039;re gonna see a lot more infamous outings from Jones.  A half-wit scout will tell you that for free.  Though he&#039;s only blown four saves, you might say, he&#039;s been on the ropes ALOT more times than his save record indicates.   And I have no idea what his ERA is now, but it has to be in 7 - 8 territory after allowing three tonight.   That just doesn&#039;t cut it for a closer.  PERIOD.  Frankly, the Tigers were lucky to get a W tonight.  In my view, the Nats gave us this game.  I don&#039;t care who comes to the plate (unless you&#039;re Magglio Ordonez) DY should have laid down a bunt with men on 1st and 2nd, no one out.  Call me crazy -- and I&#039;m sure there is an arguement to the contrary -- but bunting is a NO-BRAINER -- a base hit wins the game/putting the ball in play ties the game.  And that ain&#039;t so hard to do off Jones.  Dah?

Yes, we are only 1 game out.  But what some fail to understand is that this team should be 6 games up right now -- easily -- and that&#039;s a conservative estimate, even factoring in a few decisions the other way, given a solid bullpen.

I&#039;m not sure what the answer is.  Trading Maybin isn&#039;t it, but there are a lot of players we should be willing to trade, if we could get a good middle reliever, e.g. Monroe, Maroth, Robertson, Rodney, Grilli, etc.  Another option is to take one of the starters out of the rotation and convert to a solid middle reliever, al la Papelbon.  Couple that with a closer like Eric Gagne, and we got ourselves a bullpen that won&#039;t continually blow games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joining the discussion late&#8230; I&#8217;m gonna back up Stephen somewhat here.  Trade Maybin?  Absolutely not.  But we do have to do SOMETHING.  Doing SOMETHING is not a knee-jerk reaction.  It&#8217;s correcting a serious problem before we&#8217;re 6 games out and in an inevitable spiral.  How many bullpen melt-downs do we need to experience before discussions to rectify the situation no longer qualify as &#8220;knee-jerk&#8221; reactions?  This bullpen isn&#8217;t just gonna just fix itself.  Jones isn&#8217;t gonna all of the sudden become a dominant closer.  We&#8217;re gonna see a lot more infamous outings from Jones.  A half-wit scout will tell you that for free.  Though he&#8217;s only blown four saves, you might say, he&#8217;s been on the ropes ALOT more times than his save record indicates.   And I have no idea what his ERA is now, but it has to be in 7 &#8211; 8 territory after allowing three tonight.   That just doesn&#8217;t cut it for a closer.  PERIOD.  Frankly, the Tigers were lucky to get a W tonight.  In my view, the Nats gave us this game.  I don&#8217;t care who comes to the plate (unless you&#8217;re Magglio Ordonez) DY should have laid down a bunt with men on 1st and 2nd, no one out.  Call me crazy &#8212; and I&#8217;m sure there is an arguement to the contrary &#8212; but bunting is a NO-BRAINER &#8212; a base hit wins the game/putting the ball in play ties the game.  And that ain&#8217;t so hard to do off Jones.  Dah?</p>
<p>Yes, we are only 1 game out.  But what some fail to understand is that this team should be 6 games up right now &#8212; easily &#8212; and that&#8217;s a conservative estimate, even factoring in a few decisions the other way, given a solid bullpen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the answer is.  Trading Maybin isn&#8217;t it, but there are a lot of players we should be willing to trade, if we could get a good middle reliever, e.g. Monroe, Maroth, Robertson, Rodney, Grilli, etc.  Another option is to take one of the starters out of the rotation and convert to a solid middle reliever, al la Papelbon.  Couple that with a closer like Eric Gagne, and we got ourselves a bullpen that won&#8217;t continually blow games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/06/game-69-tigers-at-nationals/#comment-57747</guid>
		<description>Spirited debate indeed. lol.

The problem is with as many teams out there needing bullpen help getting any sort of &quot;name&quot; reliever out there is gonna cost us more than it should. I think Dombrowski is smart enough to see that and won&#039;t succumb to it.

This is why organizational depth is so important. We should look from within for bullpen help or trade some starters. DLC didn&#039;t look bad today. Trade Tata, Trahern, etc. We don&#039;t need to go for Joe Nathan.

You guys want a bullpen that goes shutout 7-8-9 everyday. That&#039;s not easy to get.

Aquiring good players for now while keeping the minors good for the future is hard. I have faith Dombrowski will figure this out.

We don&#039;t need an AJ for Nathan/Liriano type trade right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spirited debate indeed. lol.</p>
<p>The problem is with as many teams out there needing bullpen help getting any sort of &#8220;name&#8221; reliever out there is gonna cost us more than it should. I think Dombrowski is smart enough to see that and won&#8217;t succumb to it.</p>
<p>This is why organizational depth is so important. We should look from within for bullpen help or trade some starters. DLC didn&#8217;t look bad today. Trade Tata, Trahern, etc. We don&#8217;t need to go for Joe Nathan.</p>
<p>You guys want a bullpen that goes shutout 7-8-9 everyday. That&#8217;s not easy to get.</p>
<p>Aquiring good players for now while keeping the minors good for the future is hard. I have faith Dombrowski will figure this out.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need an AJ for Nathan/Liriano type trade right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

