<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-05-22</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/05/links-for-2007-05-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/05/links-for-2007-05-22/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coach Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/05/links-for-2007-05-22/#comment-55542</link>
		<dc:creator>Coach Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/05/links-for-2007-05-22/#comment-55542</guid>
		<description>This system claims Inge to be a negative and Guillen to be a positive...Hmmm.  That&#039;s not the way I see it.

One thing I noticed is at the bottom they used given names instead of nicknames.  That #2 CF listed as Exavier Logan is the beloved NOOK Logan.  Nook is the best outfielder I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This system claims Inge to be a negative and Guillen to be a positive&#8230;Hmmm.  That&#8217;s not the way I see it.</p>
<p>One thing I noticed is at the bottom they used given names instead of nicknames.  That #2 CF listed as Exavier Logan is the beloved NOOK Logan.  Nook is the best outfielder I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Panas</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/05/links-for-2007-05-22/#comment-55539</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Panas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 15:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2007/05/links-for-2007-05-22/#comment-55539</guid>
		<description>I was reading about the new fielding evaluation method (SAFE) and it looks pretty complex.  From one quick read, I really can&#039;t tell if it&#039;s an improvement or not.  I&#039;d like to see how it correlates with other methods and how consistent it is from year to year.  I will read it again later.  Evaluation of fielding and how it interacts with pitching is my favorite saber area right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading about the new fielding evaluation method (SAFE) and it looks pretty complex.  From one quick read, I really can&#8217;t tell if it&#8217;s an improvement or not.  I&#8217;d like to see how it correlates with other methods and how consistent it is from year to year.  I will read it again later.  Evaluation of fielding and how it interacts with pitching is my favorite saber area right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

