<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World Series Game 2: Cardinals at Tigers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; World Series Game 5: Tigers at Cardinals</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-22837</link>
		<dc:creator>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; World Series Game 5: Tigers at Cardinals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-22837</guid>
		<description>[...] This preview is pretty thin. First, I&#8217;ve covered the Tigers starter Justin Verlander as well as Cards starter Jeff Weaver. Second, everyone understands the consequences. Third, I&#8217;m pressed for time at the moment. I do plan on giving the live-blog thing a shot tonight (just check in this spot). I&#8217;ve never done it for fear of jinxing the team. But really, I think we&#8217;re beyond that now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This preview is pretty thin. First, I&#8217;ve covered the Tigers starter Justin Verlander as well as Cards starter Jeff Weaver. Second, everyone understands the consequences. Third, I&#8217;m pressed for time at the moment. I do plan on giving the live-blog thing a shot tonight (just check in this spot). I&#8217;ve never done it for fear of jinxing the team. But really, I think we&#8217;re beyond that now. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall in DC</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21545</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21545</guid>
		<description>Daming evidence was when Fox put up side by side pictures of Kenny, one from last nights game and one from the A&#039;s series and he had identical marks. Kinda funny to get mud stains that look just like pine tar in the exact same place two different nights.

However - he did wash it off and still spanked the Cards. 

I&#039;m sure that MLB  immediatley called the umps and said - &quot;tell him to wash his hands of that dirt&quot; Last thing you need is another &quot;scandal&quot; (See Barry Bonds) where players are cheating, and the games are unfairly decided. They will call it dirt to protect the integrety of the game when we all know it was pine tar. 

However - great game - Todd Jones is a roller coaster but He is the guy I want in there. The other guys (Rodney, Zoom Zoom, etc.) can be good but they also make those mistakes where the ball ends up 475 feet away from Home plate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daming evidence was when Fox put up side by side pictures of Kenny, one from last nights game and one from the A&#8217;s series and he had identical marks. Kinda funny to get mud stains that look just like pine tar in the exact same place two different nights.</p>
<p>However &#8211; he did wash it off and still spanked the Cards. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that MLB  immediatley called the umps and said &#8211; &#8220;tell him to wash his hands of that dirt&#8221; Last thing you need is another &#8220;scandal&#8221; (See Barry Bonds) where players are cheating, and the games are unfairly decided. They will call it dirt to protect the integrety of the game when we all know it was pine tar. </p>
<p>However &#8211; great game &#8211; Todd Jones is a roller coaster but He is the guy I want in there. The other guys (Rodney, Zoom Zoom, etc.) can be good but they also make those mistakes where the ball ends up 475 feet away from Home plate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21463</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21463</guid>
		<description>Yep, that&#039;s pine tar Shiny with tiny specks, like dirt stuck to it. I&#039;m pretty sure dirt mixed with rosen, even wet, doesn&#039;t make anything shiny like that. Maybe he wasn&#039;t aware that it&#039;s not a good thing to do? Yeah, no. He knew.

Check out the thumb too.

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/knlevine/Pinetar3.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that&#8217;s pine tar Shiny with tiny specks, like dirt stuck to it. I&#8217;m pretty sure dirt mixed with rosen, even wet, doesn&#8217;t make anything shiny like that. Maybe he wasn&#8217;t aware that it&#8217;s not a good thing to do? Yeah, no. He knew.</p>
<p>Check out the thumb too.</p>
<p><a href="http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/knlevine/Pinetar3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i25.photobucket.com/alb.....netar3.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21439</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21439</guid>
		<description>Maybe it wasn&#039;t so obvious in the other games?  I never noticed it.  I never heard about it anywhere.  But clearly after BuCarver made it obvious to the entire veiwing world (and implied it was pine tar), and pratically stomped up and down in prime time for a &quot;time out&quot;, the issue amplified in a hurry.

I&#039;m also puzzled by the way Kenny completely skirted the issue in the post-game interview.  

In any event, I would like an explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it wasn&#8217;t so obvious in the other games?  I never noticed it.  I never heard about it anywhere.  But clearly after BuCarver made it obvious to the entire veiwing world (and implied it was pine tar), and pratically stomped up and down in prime time for a &#8220;time out&#8221;, the issue amplified in a hurry.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also puzzled by the way Kenny completely skirted the issue in the post-game interview.  </p>
<p>In any event, I would like an explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21435</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21435</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what was on Kenny&#039;s hand, and I don&#039;t know how or what it would impact performance.  But the stuff was there in the other playoff games as well.  I remember noticing the yellow-ish ness in earlier games, without an extreme close-up, and thinking it was a bruise.  Clearly it wasn&#039;t.

Now if this was something that other teams were worrrying about, wouldn&#039;t it have been called to someone&#039;s attention?  With the number of people watching these games, and the detailed scouting and video analysis someone must have seen it and decided it was a non-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what was on Kenny&#8217;s hand, and I don&#8217;t know how or what it would impact performance.  But the stuff was there in the other playoff games as well.  I remember noticing the yellow-ish ness in earlier games, without an extreme close-up, and thinking it was a bruise.  Clearly it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Now if this was something that other teams were worrrying about, wouldn&#8217;t it have been called to someone&#8217;s attention?  With the number of people watching these games, and the detailed scouting and video analysis someone must have seen it and decided it was a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian A.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21434</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21434</guid>
		<description>http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/knlevine/Pinetar2.jpg

anyone who doesn&#039;t think it was pinetar and intentional is kidding themselves.  i feel sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/knlevine/Pinetar2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i25.photobucket.com/alb.....netar2.jpg</a></p>
<p>anyone who doesn&#8217;t think it was pinetar and intentional is kidding themselves.  i feel sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate A.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21432</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21432</guid>
		<description>Another excellent outing by Rogers. He wasn&#039;t confounding the hitters like he was in the other series, but he definately kept the Cards contained. Jones of course made things interresting at the end, but I wasn&#039;t overly worried. I have no trouble with Jones in most situations. Its when he gets runners in scoring position with fewer than 2 out when I want to bring in someone else, and he&#039;s usually been pretty good at keeping runners on 1st base.

I dunno what happened to Granderson or Polanco, but they got shut down tonite. Pudge continues to come up with nothing this postseason. Ordones, Inge, and especially Guillen had pretty good days today. And you cannot discount Monroe jumpstarting the bats in the 1st inning. Gotta love it! Weaver had pretty good stuff tonite and I was happy to see the Tigs battle it out. Would&#039;ve prefered about a dozen runs, but can&#039;t have it all :P

And since I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be talked about for a while, anyone find anything about the substance on Rogers hand? Kenny avoided it in the post-game interview. I can&#039;t imagine a veteran of his tallent and experience would be cheating. And being where it was on his hand and very obvious, I think we can assume it wasn&#039;t intentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another excellent outing by Rogers. He wasn&#8217;t confounding the hitters like he was in the other series, but he definately kept the Cards contained. Jones of course made things interresting at the end, but I wasn&#8217;t overly worried. I have no trouble with Jones in most situations. Its when he gets runners in scoring position with fewer than 2 out when I want to bring in someone else, and he&#8217;s usually been pretty good at keeping runners on 1st base.</p>
<p>I dunno what happened to Granderson or Polanco, but they got shut down tonite. Pudge continues to come up with nothing this postseason. Ordones, Inge, and especially Guillen had pretty good days today. And you cannot discount Monroe jumpstarting the bats in the 1st inning. Gotta love it! Weaver had pretty good stuff tonite and I was happy to see the Tigs battle it out. Would&#8217;ve prefered about a dozen runs, but can&#8217;t have it all <img src='http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And since I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be talked about for a while, anyone find anything about the substance on Rogers hand? Kenny avoided it in the post-game interview. I can&#8217;t imagine a veteran of his tallent and experience would be cheating. And being where it was on his hand and very obvious, I think we can assume it wasn&#8217;t intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle J</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21431</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21431</guid>
		<description>Steve Palermo, the MLB Umpire Superivor, was just live on ESPN.  He portrayed the mark as dirt that Kenny picked up at some point due to the wet conditions.  Says it could have happened in the bullpen.  Says there was no formal request made by the Cardinals to inspect Rogers.

This is fairly strange.  There seem to have been several conflicting statements.  My only comment is that people keep talking about a &quot;clump.&quot;  I didn&#039;t see a clump.  I saw a dark discoloration.  Maybe that doesn&#039;t matter if it was actually pine tar.  But it was a dark stain, and then it was a light stain.  I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s enough to doctor a ball with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Palermo, the MLB Umpire Superivor, was just live on ESPN.  He portrayed the mark as dirt that Kenny picked up at some point due to the wet conditions.  Says it could have happened in the bullpen.  Says there was no formal request made by the Cardinals to inspect Rogers.</p>
<p>This is fairly strange.  There seem to have been several conflicting statements.  My only comment is that people keep talking about a &#8220;clump.&#8221;  I didn&#8217;t see a clump.  I saw a dark discoloration.  Maybe that doesn&#8217;t matter if it was actually pine tar.  But it was a dark stain, and then it was a light stain.  I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s enough to doctor a ball with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21430</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21430</guid>
		<description>i would always play jones in that situation, he&#039;s the closer.  everyone knows he&#039;s not a lights out stopper, he gives up hits because he pitches to contact.  he seems to thrive in clutch situations (frank thomas and now jim edmonds) the guy delivers, he&#039;s one of the top 5 closers in the game, he just likes to make it exciting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would always play jones in that situation, he&#8217;s the closer.  everyone knows he&#8217;s not a lights out stopper, he gives up hits because he pitches to contact.  he seems to thrive in clutch situations (frank thomas and now jim edmonds) the guy delivers, he&#8217;s one of the top 5 closers in the game, he just likes to make it exciting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21429</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21429</guid>
		<description>there i was, all reclined and enjoying another rogers masterpiece, then the wife wants a back rub.  Fine, no problem, i&#039;ll put my recliner down and give her one, but if the cards score it&#039;s her fault....runners on 2nd &amp; 3rd, she gets up and says put the recliner back up.  i&#039;m not superstitous (same sweatshirt every game not washed yet...same shaving pattern, game one then only on off days) but i still told her that you can&#039;t mess with karma......gotta love roller coaster jones, not to mention 4 more scoreless innings from mr (it&#039;s a wonderful day in the neighborhood) rogers and christy mathewson is a footnote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there i was, all reclined and enjoying another rogers masterpiece, then the wife wants a back rub.  Fine, no problem, i&#8217;ll put my recliner down and give her one, but if the cards score it&#8217;s her fault&#8230;.runners on 2nd &amp; 3rd, she gets up and says put the recliner back up.  i&#8217;m not superstitous (same sweatshirt every game not washed yet&#8230;same shaving pattern, game one then only on off days) but i still told her that you can&#8217;t mess with karma&#8230;&#8230;gotta love roller coaster jones, not to mention 4 more scoreless innings from mr (it&#8217;s a wonderful day in the neighborhood) rogers and christy mathewson is a footnote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21427</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21427</guid>
		<description>Okay, general question for the board:  How many run lead are you comfortable with with Jones closing?

I say five, I have no worries.  Four, still a concern.  Three, definately too close to put it in the books.   And no disrespect for Jonesy; he&#039;s got the job done this year.  It&#039;s just came with a lot of drama.

Another question, do you ever pull a closer?  I guess the game is his to save or blow, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, general question for the board:  How many run lead are you comfortable with with Jones closing?</p>
<p>I say five, I have no worries.  Four, still a concern.  Three, definately too close to put it in the books.   And no disrespect for Jonesy; he&#8217;s got the job done this year.  It&#8217;s just came with a lot of drama.</p>
<p>Another question, do you ever pull a closer?  I guess the game is his to save or blow, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21424</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21424</guid>
		<description>This is beginning to look like 68&#039;. Let&#039;s hope for the same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is beginning to look like 68&#8242;. Let&#8217;s hope for the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21422</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21422</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that each outing for Rogers has been consecutively better?  I would have left him in for the complete game... (I was calling for Rogers in the ninth before the Jones near debacle).  Why not?  His pitch count was low.  It would have been a great achievement, a huge statement, and a nice way to roll into game three.   

The runners left in scoring position are a little troubling.   This could have been, what, an eight run game fairly easily with only a couple clutch hits and a sacrifice or two...

Jones, rollercoster Jones.  I&#039;m not sure my ticker can take it.  Even with two outs and a three run cushion, I still find myself on pins and needles.  And after what happened tonight, I guess my paranoia is not unfounded.  Wow.  I&#039;m very happy the inning worked out the way it did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that each outing for Rogers has been consecutively better?  I would have left him in for the complete game&#8230; (I was calling for Rogers in the ninth before the Jones near debacle).  Why not?  His pitch count was low.  It would have been a great achievement, a huge statement, and a nice way to roll into game three.   </p>
<p>The runners left in scoring position are a little troubling.   This could have been, what, an eight run game fairly easily with only a couple clutch hits and a sacrifice or two&#8230;</p>
<p>Jones, rollercoster Jones.  I&#8217;m not sure my ticker can take it.  Even with two outs and a three run cushion, I still find myself on pins and needles.  And after what happened tonight, I guess my paranoia is not unfounded.  Wow.  I&#8217;m very happy the inning worked out the way it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21420</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21420</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen a starting pitcher without a plus fastball pitch as effectively as Rogers. These last three starts have been magnificent. As Lou Pineilla said during the ALCS, the way to beat Rogers is to move back in the batter&#039;s box, and the Cardinals aren&#039;t adjusting.

Jones&#039;s job is to shut the door, and he didn&#039;t do it tonight. Perhaps he&#039;ll rebound for the rest of the series.

So, a good split in Detroit, and we now need 2 of 3 games in St. Louis. The team needs to hit with men on base for that outcome, and Rodriguez needs to hit, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen a starting pitcher without a plus fastball pitch as effectively as Rogers. These last three starts have been magnificent. As Lou Pineilla said during the ALCS, the way to beat Rogers is to move back in the batter&#8217;s box, and the Cardinals aren&#8217;t adjusting.</p>
<p>Jones&#8217;s job is to shut the door, and he didn&#8217;t do it tonight. Perhaps he&#8217;ll rebound for the rest of the series.</p>
<p>So, a good split in Detroit, and we now need 2 of 3 games in St. Louis. The team needs to hit with men on base for that outcome, and Rodriguez needs to hit, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21419</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/world-series-game-2-cardinals-at-tigers/#comment-21419</guid>
		<description>Wow-

Now we are 1-1, let&#039;s take 2 of 3 down there. Then the Gambler can win game 6 and close it out.

-Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow-</p>
<p>Now we are 1-1, let&#8217;s take 2 of 3 down there. Then the Gambler can win game 6 and close it out.</p>
<p>-Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

