<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tigers set ALCS rotation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18665</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18665</guid>
		<description>Nick - in my mind when I was writing that I was being sarcastic but re-reading it now you&#039;d have no way to no that.  That&#039;s why I pointed out later that he was just as good in Comerica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8211; in my mind when I was writing that I was being sarcastic but re-reading it now you&#8217;d have no way to no that.  That&#8217;s why I pointed out later that he was just as good in Comerica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18662</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18662</guid>
		<description>Does it really make sense to say Rogers is invincible in the Coliseum when most of those starts occured when he was with the A&#039;s in the late 90&#039;s?  Over the last four years he&#039;s pitched basically the same in the Coliseum as he has in Comerica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it really make sense to say Rogers is invincible in the Coliseum when most of those starts occured when he was with the A&#8217;s in the late 90&#8242;s?  Over the last four years he&#8217;s pitched basically the same in the Coliseum as he has in Comerica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18561</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18561</guid>
		<description>i think it&#039;s a solid, smart move simply because if it goes back to oakland you have verlander and rogers both with 4 days rest, if they win game 7 then you have bonderman to start game 1.  Plus if game 7 is in doubt you still would have bonderman on 3 days rest for relief.

As a manager you&#039;d have to assume it will go 7, not just juggle things around and hope you sweep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s a solid, smart move simply because if it goes back to oakland you have verlander and rogers both with 4 days rest, if they win game 7 then you have bonderman to start game 1.  Plus if game 7 is in doubt you still would have bonderman on 3 days rest for relief.</p>
<p>As a manager you&#8217;d have to assume it will go 7, not just juggle things around and hope you sweep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18558</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18558</guid>
		<description>If Nate really struggles they could bring back Verlander/Rogers/Bonderman on short reat, although I wouldn&#039;t advise it.

-Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Nate really struggles they could bring back Verlander/Rogers/Bonderman on short reat, although I wouldn&#8217;t advise it.</p>
<p>-Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken from Jersey</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken from Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/tigers-set-alcs-rotation/#comment-18552</guid>
		<description>I suppose the main reasoning was: If it ain&#039;t broke, don&#039;t fix it. To juggle the rotation might send the wrong message. Robertson has already endured what will quite possibly be the toughest starting assignment of his life, Game 1 in Yankee Stadium.

This way, the first time through, Robertson pitches on 6 days rest, Verlander on 5, Rogers on 6 and Bonderman on 6.

Of course, they could skip Robertson, which then puts everyone else on a more &quot;normal&quot; schedule. However, if by chance the Tigers are down 1-2 heading into Saturday (which would simply mean everyone holds serve, so to speak), then it would fall to Robertson on 10 days rest.

I&#039;m not sure how Robertson pitches on extended rest, but the chance of a rusty Robertson taking the mound in such a pivotal game isn&#039;t appealing. The other option would be to skip him again (and show no confidence in him at all for the ALCS) and send out Verlander on 3 days rest. Verlander, I think we&#039;ve seen, is better on regular to longer rest at this point.

So it comes down to this: If it&#039;s 1-2 heading into Saturday, do you want Bonderman on 6 days rest or a very well rested Robertson or short rested Verlander? I want Bonderman.

Then, depending on the situation, you can continue with the rotation or start bumping up guys on 3 days rest.  I think this is more sensible. And if Robertson and/or Verlander win one or both of those first two games in Oakland, then you&#039;ve really got options.

Hopefully, all this is rendered moot by the Tigers just continuing to roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the main reasoning was: If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it. To juggle the rotation might send the wrong message. Robertson has already endured what will quite possibly be the toughest starting assignment of his life, Game 1 in Yankee Stadium.</p>
<p>This way, the first time through, Robertson pitches on 6 days rest, Verlander on 5, Rogers on 6 and Bonderman on 6.</p>
<p>Of course, they could skip Robertson, which then puts everyone else on a more &#8220;normal&#8221; schedule. However, if by chance the Tigers are down 1-2 heading into Saturday (which would simply mean everyone holds serve, so to speak), then it would fall to Robertson on 10 days rest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how Robertson pitches on extended rest, but the chance of a rusty Robertson taking the mound in such a pivotal game isn&#8217;t appealing. The other option would be to skip him again (and show no confidence in him at all for the ALCS) and send out Verlander on 3 days rest. Verlander, I think we&#8217;ve seen, is better on regular to longer rest at this point.</p>
<p>So it comes down to this: If it&#8217;s 1-2 heading into Saturday, do you want Bonderman on 6 days rest or a very well rested Robertson or short rested Verlander? I want Bonderman.</p>
<p>Then, depending on the situation, you can continue with the rotation or start bumping up guys on 3 days rest.  I think this is more sensible. And if Robertson and/or Verlander win one or both of those first two games in Oakland, then you&#8217;ve really got options.</p>
<p>Hopefully, all this is rendered moot by the Tigers just continuing to roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

