<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ALDS Game 1: Tigers at Yankees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey C.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17413</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17413</guid>
		<description>Jeff M,

I gotta hear that clip!  Get that thing posted.

I know the optimism from me is out of character, but I really was kinda heartened by that game last night.  We can take this next one from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff M,</p>
<p>I gotta hear that clip!  Get that thing posted.</p>
<p>I know the optimism from me is out of character, but I really was kinda heartened by that game last night.  We can take this next one from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall in DC</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17403</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17403</guid>
		<description>As I said after the last Game Vs. the O. (Camden Yards when had bases loaded and 0 out and no runs scored). This team can&#039;t seem to drive anybody in when they need to. We should have had a 2 run lead going into the 4th. 

I love Pudge but this team is going as far as he, Guillen and Maggilo can take it. 0 for 4 was just pathetic.

It has been a great year, and I&#039;m trying to enjoy this  for what it is worth and not get my hopes up. I hope Verlander enjoyed his rest and mows down the Yanks tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said after the last Game Vs. the O. (Camden Yards when had bases loaded and 0 out and no runs scored). This team can&#8217;t seem to drive anybody in when they need to. We should have had a 2 run lead going into the 4th. </p>
<p>I love Pudge but this team is going as far as he, Guillen and Maggilo can take it. 0 for 4 was just pathetic.</p>
<p>It has been a great year, and I&#8217;m trying to enjoy this  for what it is worth and not get my hopes up. I hope Verlander enjoyed his rest and mows down the Yanks tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17389</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17389</guid>
		<description>the tigers have lost seven of eight, gone 19-32, are down 0-1, and face perhaps the most formidable lineup ever, and some of you are still optimistic. pass the dutchie on the right hand side! i need some of that good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the tigers have lost seven of eight, gone 19-32, are down 0-1, and face perhaps the most formidable lineup ever, and some of you are still optimistic. pass the dutchie on the right hand side! i need some of that good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17382</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I just reread that post and I can’t believe that I thought someone else might be rolling with that kind of optimism.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
LOL, Joey, I&#039;m just glad to hear that kind of optimism from you. Weren&#039;t you doubting their right to be in the playoffs a few days ago?

This was certainly a winnable game. I&#039;m not saying they &quot;should have&quot; or &quot;deserved to&quot;, but they were in this game. Ho Chi Min (Yes, I know that&#039;s not his name. No, I&#039;m not racist, I&#039;m just venting against NYY) had our number all year and we put some runs up on the board against him. I look forward to bigger and better things in the coming days.

BTW, a WWJ staffer interviewed me after the game. Be sure to tune in for my intoxicated and mostly useless comment in the morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I just reread that post and I can’t believe that I thought someone else might be rolling with that kind of optimism.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL, Joey, I&#8217;m just glad to hear that kind of optimism from you. Weren&#8217;t you doubting their right to be in the playoffs a few days ago?</p>
<p>This was certainly a winnable game. I&#8217;m not saying they &#8220;should have&#8221; or &#8220;deserved to&#8221;, but they were in this game. Ho Chi Min (Yes, I know that&#8217;s not his name. No, I&#8217;m not racist, I&#8217;m just venting against NYY) had our number all year and we put some runs up on the board against him. I look forward to bigger and better things in the coming days.</p>
<p>BTW, a WWJ staffer interviewed me after the game. Be sure to tune in for my intoxicated and mostly useless comment in the morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey C.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17378</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17378</guid>
		<description>I just reread that post and I can&#039;t believe that I thought someone else might be rolling with that kind of optimism.

I&#039;m a little drunk and it&#039;s 3:00 AM. 

That&#039;s a disclaimer.  In other words, don&#039;t hit the bookie with any bets based on that prediction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just reread that post and I can&#8217;t believe that I thought someone else might be rolling with that kind of optimism.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little drunk and it&#8217;s 3:00 AM. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a disclaimer.  In other words, don&#8217;t hit the bookie with any bets based on that prediction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey C.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17375</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17375</guid>
		<description>Late to the party...family in from out of town.

Dudes, I have to say that I agree with Billfer.  This game felt winable all the way through.  We even got someone on base versus Mariano, and I really thought someone might connect against him.

Here&#039;s my prediction--and sorry if someone already made it:

Justin comes in tomorrow all kinds of juiced up.  He brings the 98 MPH stuff he featured early in the season, hits corners and commands all three pitches.  He holds the Yanks to less than three, the bullpen gives up on and the Tigers bats knock in five.

We come home tied a game a piece.

Go Tigers!

And yes that pitch to Jeter was definitely a strike and for some reason the ump thought that he needed help.  

Dirtbag McClellan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the party&#8230;family in from out of town.</p>
<p>Dudes, I have to say that I agree with Billfer.  This game felt winable all the way through.  We even got someone on base versus Mariano, and I really thought someone might connect against him.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my prediction&#8211;and sorry if someone already made it:</p>
<p>Justin comes in tomorrow all kinds of juiced up.  He brings the 98 MPH stuff he featured early in the season, hits corners and commands all three pitches.  He holds the Yanks to less than three, the bullpen gives up on and the Tigers bats knock in five.</p>
<p>We come home tied a game a piece.</p>
<p>Go Tigers!</p>
<p>And yes that pitch to Jeter was definitely a strike and for some reason the ump thought that he needed help.  </p>
<p>Dirtbag McClellan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick G</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17370</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17370</guid>
		<description>From the begining of the Fox coverage, I felt good. Leyland&#039;s sound bite in the beginning was great. To parapharase, &quot;Some people think we don&#039;t belong here. Only three teams in all of baseball had better records than we did. We&#039;re not apologizing for anything.&quot;

Gave me goosebumps.

Have to say that the two jerks, Buck and McCarver, gave it to us lightly with the critiques. But, of course, what are they going to say? &quot;Turn your channel, America. This is a blowout.&quot;

Anyway, we got this far. We can&#039;t give up on the boys until the last out.

Go Tigers!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the begining of the Fox coverage, I felt good. Leyland&#8217;s sound bite in the beginning was great. To parapharase, &#8220;Some people think we don&#8217;t belong here. Only three teams in all of baseball had better records than we did. We&#8217;re not apologizing for anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gave me goosebumps.</p>
<p>Have to say that the two jerks, Buck and McCarver, gave it to us lightly with the critiques. But, of course, what are they going to say? &#8220;Turn your channel, America. This is a blowout.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, we got this far. We can&#8217;t give up on the boys until the last out.</p>
<p>Go Tigers!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo SunDevil</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo SunDevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17369</guid>
		<description>I am still really salty about that wild card, we should be division titles.

That ground ball that got by Polanco in the 7th, anyone think that if that was Neifi at second, he would have got it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still really salty about that wild card, we should be division titles.</p>
<p>That ground ball that got by Polanco in the 7th, anyone think that if that was Neifi at second, he would have got it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy in NY</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17366</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy in NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17366</guid>
		<description>Just got back from the Stadium. Out of the 10,000 people I saw/came in contact with, I saw three Tigers hats. Kind of discouraging. Anyhow...

I&#039;m not as encouraged by this game as a lot of others. Like another poster mentioned, we had 12 hits and 7 for extra bases... what&#039;re the odds we&#039;re going to do that again this series? I think it&#039;s less a case of us getting the bats going and more a case of us squandering an opportunity here. We had a winnable game but we didn&#039;t get the pitching tonight out of Robertson and that&#039;s what we hang our hat on. 

Granderson looked good from the first pitch tonight, also very nearly threw out that runner at third in the late innings - usually when he goes, the team goes. Maggs and Inge were both lively tonight too. But Pudge was the limiting factor, not sure why he struggled so much when everyone else was seeing Wang well. He swings and misses at more pitches than just about anyone in baseball I think. 

I was wondering if anyone thought Casey should have made more of a play on Abreu&#039;s 2-run single in the 6th. It looked like he was a lot closer to the ball than Polanco, but he went straight for the bag. That was the ballgame right there. 

Let&#039;s hope we get a huge game out of JV and the bullpen tomorrow night. We need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got back from the Stadium. Out of the 10,000 people I saw/came in contact with, I saw three Tigers hats. Kind of discouraging. Anyhow&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not as encouraged by this game as a lot of others. Like another poster mentioned, we had 12 hits and 7 for extra bases&#8230; what&#8217;re the odds we&#8217;re going to do that again this series? I think it&#8217;s less a case of us getting the bats going and more a case of us squandering an opportunity here. We had a winnable game but we didn&#8217;t get the pitching tonight out of Robertson and that&#8217;s what we hang our hat on. </p>
<p>Granderson looked good from the first pitch tonight, also very nearly threw out that runner at third in the late innings &#8211; usually when he goes, the team goes. Maggs and Inge were both lively tonight too. But Pudge was the limiting factor, not sure why he struggled so much when everyone else was seeing Wang well. He swings and misses at more pitches than just about anyone in baseball I think. </p>
<p>I was wondering if anyone thought Casey should have made more of a play on Abreu&#8217;s 2-run single in the 6th. It looked like he was a lot closer to the ball than Polanco, but he went straight for the bag. That was the ballgame right there. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope we get a huge game out of JV and the bullpen tomorrow night. We need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate A.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17364</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17364</guid>
		<description>Not the best game, but not a poor one either. The team fought it out. I think at the very least they managed to work the playoff jitters off and given themselves some confidence that they can indeed take the Yanquis. 

Apart from Pudge, the hitters did a good job adjusting to pitches from Wang. I am a bit supprised that Guillen especially wasnt more agressive on the bases for how much he was on and given Posada&#039;s arm. I agree that Robertson got frazzled after that Damon bouncer that got by him. On the whole, not a terrible outing for him, but NY certainly took advantage of his weak moments.

The thing that scared me the most was Polanco&#039;s dive near the end. I cringed watching him go down on that left shoulder. Worse watching him next half of the inning warm up on deck and gingerly swing with that left arm grimacing the whole way. Lets hope he&#039;s still healthy enough to play.

Now it&#039;s Verlander&#039;s turn to really step up and shut things down. I like his chances on long rest and playoff energy. Mussina is beatable, and Tigs have a statistical advantage on him being primarily right handed batters. We need to take this game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the best game, but not a poor one either. The team fought it out. I think at the very least they managed to work the playoff jitters off and given themselves some confidence that they can indeed take the Yanquis. </p>
<p>Apart from Pudge, the hitters did a good job adjusting to pitches from Wang. I am a bit supprised that Guillen especially wasnt more agressive on the bases for how much he was on and given Posada&#8217;s arm. I agree that Robertson got frazzled after that Damon bouncer that got by him. On the whole, not a terrible outing for him, but NY certainly took advantage of his weak moments.</p>
<p>The thing that scared me the most was Polanco&#8217;s dive near the end. I cringed watching him go down on that left shoulder. Worse watching him next half of the inning warm up on deck and gingerly swing with that left arm grimacing the whole way. Lets hope he&#8217;s still healthy enough to play.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s Verlander&#8217;s turn to really step up and shut things down. I like his chances on long rest and playoff energy. Mussina is beatable, and Tigs have a statistical advantage on him being primarily right handed batters. We need to take this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scuba</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17363</link>
		<dc:creator>Scuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17363</guid>
		<description>Funny..and I thought Granderson would be a big problem in the lineup.  Thank you Pudge for proving me wrong with your 0 for 4, 4 LOB performance.

It was nice to see our bats make some noise.  If we don&#039;t screw the pooch in the 3rd this was a totally different ballgame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny..and I thought Granderson would be a big problem in the lineup.  Thank you Pudge for proving me wrong with your 0 for 4, 4 LOB performance.</p>
<p>It was nice to see our bats make some noise.  If we don&#8217;t screw the pooch in the 3rd this was a totally different ballgame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17360</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17360</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s how it is folks, the Tigers shot themselves in the foot tonight. Stop swinging at every first pitch. 
Give mistakes to the Yankees and you&#039;ll get burned.
Stop swinging at every first pitch.
The game could have gone another direction.
Stop swinging at every first pitch.
Gradenerson needs to take out the double  play with a harder slide.
Stop swinging at every first pitch.
Any fan of baseball can tell you that Jeter is the man.
Stop swinging at every first pitch.
Keep your head up, tomorrow is a must win and if we can pull it out ,we have an injured Unit next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how it is folks, the Tigers shot themselves in the foot tonight. Stop swinging at every first pitch.<br />
Give mistakes to the Yankees and you&#8217;ll get burned.<br />
Stop swinging at every first pitch.<br />
The game could have gone another direction.<br />
Stop swinging at every first pitch.<br />
Gradenerson needs to take out the double  play with a harder slide.<br />
Stop swinging at every first pitch.<br />
Any fan of baseball can tell you that Jeter is the man.<br />
Stop swinging at every first pitch.<br />
Keep your head up, tomorrow is a must win and if we can pull it out ,we have an injured Unit next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17359</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17359</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it sure did seem like the ump thought the pitch was a ball as long as Jeter didn&#039;t swing. That&#039;s a little too much, isn&#039;t it? Also, I have to tag Pudge for his not-so-great at-battage in this game. He goes 2 for 4 or something, and we&#039;re that much closer to winning this game. 

I&#039;m actually really excited now about the Tigers&#039; chances - before the game it seemed like there was no way we&#039;d get any offence against Wang - the 19 game winner. Of course, it&#039;s not hard to win 19 games when your team likes to light up things to the tune of 15 runs a game. Here&#039;s some other thing - The Royals scored 9 runs in 2 of their games to beat us, while we kept the Yankees to just 8. Best team/worst team? Weird.

Verlander takes the hill tomorrow, and he&#039;s one of the pitchers we haven&#039;t seen take a dive in the last week or so. I think we win this one. And on Thursday, I&#039;m optimistic about taking on Johnson who has A HERNIATED DISK!!! Yeah. The next two games should be easier than tonight&#039;s was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it sure did seem like the ump thought the pitch was a ball as long as Jeter didn&#8217;t swing. That&#8217;s a little too much, isn&#8217;t it? Also, I have to tag Pudge for his not-so-great at-battage in this game. He goes 2 for 4 or something, and we&#8217;re that much closer to winning this game. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually really excited now about the Tigers&#8217; chances &#8211; before the game it seemed like there was no way we&#8217;d get any offence against Wang &#8211; the 19 game winner. Of course, it&#8217;s not hard to win 19 games when your team likes to light up things to the tune of 15 runs a game. Here&#8217;s some other thing &#8211; The Royals scored 9 runs in 2 of their games to beat us, while we kept the Yankees to just 8. Best team/worst team? Weird.</p>
<p>Verlander takes the hill tomorrow, and he&#8217;s one of the pitchers we haven&#8217;t seen take a dive in the last week or so. I think we win this one. And on Thursday, I&#8217;m optimistic about taking on Johnson who has A HERNIATED DISK!!! Yeah. The next two games should be easier than tonight&#8217;s was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17357</link>
		<dc:creator>T Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17357</guid>
		<description>That 3rd inning Jeter at-bat should become infamous.  I wonder if its possible (on the Internet, or wherever) to crop a strike zone up on the replay (like they do on Fox) and replay that at-bat?  How do you not call two of those pitches strikes?

This is a tough loss, but I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s a lopsided victory for the Yanks, despite the score.  We caught a very bad break in the 3rd inning.  If we catch Jeter looking (as he definately was out--and I&#039;m not just saying that as a Tiger fan), we are talking maybe a 4-3 Tiger victory here.  That whole infamous at bat sparked the 5 run rally for the Yanks.  I would really LOVE to see that bat with a strike zone cropped on the screen.  Two of those pitches were right down Broadway, so to speak.   I truly think replays with a strike zone would humiliate the ump, or at the very least, demonstrate he is perhaps really just vying for the &quot;Jeter for MVP&quot; campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 3rd inning Jeter at-bat should become infamous.  I wonder if its possible (on the Internet, or wherever) to crop a strike zone up on the replay (like they do on Fox) and replay that at-bat?  How do you not call two of those pitches strikes?</p>
<p>This is a tough loss, but I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a lopsided victory for the Yanks, despite the score.  We caught a very bad break in the 3rd inning.  If we catch Jeter looking (as he definately was out&#8211;and I&#8217;m not just saying that as a Tiger fan), we are talking maybe a 4-3 Tiger victory here.  That whole infamous at bat sparked the 5 run rally for the Yanks.  I would really LOVE to see that bat with a strike zone cropped on the screen.  Two of those pitches were right down Broadway, so to speak.   I truly think replays with a strike zone would humiliate the ump, or at the very least, demonstrate he is perhaps really just vying for the &#8220;Jeter for MVP&#8221; campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17355</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/10/alds-game-1-tigers-at-yankees/#comment-17355</guid>
		<description>Well, to be honest, I came away from the game feeling not too badly.  Yes, it sucks that we lost.  But I agree with Billfer (and several of the other posts) that the game was a lot closer than the box score would indicate.

The Tigers had some tough breaks.  The double-steal in the second inning was a gaffe.  And yes, in a couple of key at-bats, Nate Robertson had a couple of strikeouts that were not called.  

The Yankees also caught a couple of big breaks.  I don&#039;t know if people remember this, but Jeter&#039;s double in that inning would have been a double play if Guillen hadn&#039;t shaded toward the middle to cover the bag.  If that one play goes differently, we&#039;re looking at a very different ballgame.

What&#039;s even more encouraging is that everybody contributed today.  Granderson hit well; Polanco had a couple of good swings (including a great hit the opposite way), despite apparently being in some degree of pain; Casey had a pair of solid hits; Ordonez hit well; Monroe tagged one, of course; and Inge was as scrappy as ever.

Of course, they didn&#039;t put it all together in a big inning.  But they did all of this against a good pitcher.  (Wang wasn&#039;t at his best, but he wasn&#039;t bad, either.)  What&#039;s more, I think we have the heart of our rotation coming up.  I&#039;ll take Kenny Rogers or Jeremy Bonderman over Corey Lidle and Jaret Wright anytime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, to be honest, I came away from the game feeling not too badly.  Yes, it sucks that we lost.  But I agree with Billfer (and several of the other posts) that the game was a lot closer than the box score would indicate.</p>
<p>The Tigers had some tough breaks.  The double-steal in the second inning was a gaffe.  And yes, in a couple of key at-bats, Nate Robertson had a couple of strikeouts that were not called.  </p>
<p>The Yankees also caught a couple of big breaks.  I don&#8217;t know if people remember this, but Jeter&#8217;s double in that inning would have been a double play if Guillen hadn&#8217;t shaded toward the middle to cover the bag.  If that one play goes differently, we&#8217;re looking at a very different ballgame.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more encouraging is that everybody contributed today.  Granderson hit well; Polanco had a couple of good swings (including a great hit the opposite way), despite apparently being in some degree of pain; Casey had a pair of solid hits; Ordonez hit well; Monroe tagged one, of course; and Inge was as scrappy as ever.</p>
<p>Of course, they didn&#8217;t put it all together in a big inning.  But they did all of this against a good pitcher.  (Wang wasn&#8217;t at his best, but he wasn&#8217;t bad, either.)  What&#8217;s more, I think we have the heart of our rotation coming up.  I&#8217;ll take Kenny Rogers or Jeremy Bonderman over Corey Lidle and Jaret Wright anytime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

