<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 97:  A&#8217;s at Tigers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: H2OPoloPunk</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>H2OPoloPunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>I was pretty pissed about the non-coverage here (Florida) on Saturday too. Considering the outcome though, I&#039;ll remain satisfactorily satiated having watched the Tigers beat the White Sox on ESPN.

Oh, TV coverage... where art thou?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pretty pissed about the non-coverage here (Florida) on Saturday too. Considering the outcome though, I&#8217;ll remain satisfactorily satiated having watched the Tigers beat the White Sox on ESPN.</p>
<p>Oh, TV coverage&#8230; where art thou?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7948</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7948</guid>
		<description>srry.
6-2
okay .750
thats reflects even worse on u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>srry.<br />
6-2<br />
okay .750<br />
thats reflects even worse on u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7947</guid>
		<description>Scott.
R U seriously going to complain about Miner.
SERIOUSLY
He&#039;s a rookie. give him a chance. He&#039;s what 4-2, .666 is pretty good. Ur pretty stuck up to complain about .666</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott.<br />
R U seriously going to complain about Miner.<br />
SERIOUSLY<br />
He&#8217;s a rookie. give him a chance. He&#8217;s what 4-2, .666 is pretty good. Ur pretty stuck up to complain about .666</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7930</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7930</guid>
		<description>I swear, the people that &quot;run things&quot; and make decisions on which games are shown...they need to be shot. They&#039;re not baseball fans, they&#039;re &quot;TV executives&quot; with no sports clue whatsoever. They showed the Astros / Mets here, too (Florida). That, in itself, was ridiculous. Then, with the rain delay, we had to suffer, and I mean suffer, thru the Cubs / Nats for awhile. It was disgusting. I couldn&#039;t even watch it on mlb.com; I was totally shut out...... What I do know is: Miner&#039;s last 3 or 4 starts have not been good. He did fine when first brought up (maybe his first 4 starts), but has definitely faded his last 3 or 4. Here&#039;s his skinny: prior to June 30 - 5 starts, 31.1 IP, 2.59 ERA. Now: 9 starts, 48.2 IP, 4.07 ERA. At least we didn&#039;t lose any ground, both the Sox and Twins lost. No harm, no foul.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear, the people that &#8220;run things&#8221; and make decisions on which games are shown&#8230;they need to be shot. They&#8217;re not baseball fans, they&#8217;re &#8220;TV executives&#8221; with no sports clue whatsoever. They showed the Astros / Mets here, too (Florida). That, in itself, was ridiculous. Then, with the rain delay, we had to suffer, and I mean suffer, thru the Cubs / Nats for awhile. It was disgusting. I couldn&#8217;t even watch it on mlb.com; I was totally shut out&#8230;&#8230; What I do know is: Miner&#8217;s last 3 or 4 starts have not been good. He did fine when first brought up (maybe his first 4 starts), but has definitely faded his last 3 or 4. Here&#8217;s his skinny: prior to June 30 &#8211; 5 starts, 31.1 IP, 2.59 ERA. Now: 9 starts, 48.2 IP, 4.07 ERA. At least we didn&#8217;t lose any ground, both the Sox and Twins lost. No harm, no foul&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7916</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7916</guid>
		<description>Is all of the focus and fuss about needing another bat in the lineup a moot point?  If Miner continues to struggle will we see the 6-man rotation that Jim Leyland keeps hinting at?  Read this story from Mlb.com - &lt;a href=&quot;http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060722&amp;content_id=1569522&amp;vkey=news_mlb&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=mlb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;
Leyland talks about having a 6-man rotation at least one turn through the rotation to give everyone a breather for the stretch run.  

Anyway, Cleveland is pounding the Twins (11-0 in the 9th) and the White Sox are tied 1-1 with the Rangers in the bottom of the eighth.  Even the 1984 Tigers had their struggles in July.  Keep the faith.  These Tigers got bite, baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is all of the focus and fuss about needing another bat in the lineup a moot point?  If Miner continues to struggle will we see the 6-man rotation that Jim Leyland keeps hinting at?  Read this story from Mlb.com &#8211; <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060722&amp;content_id=1569522&amp;vkey=news_mlb&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=mlb" rel="nofollow">here.</a><br />
Leyland talks about having a 6-man rotation at least one turn through the rotation to give everyone a breather for the stretch run.  </p>
<p>Anyway, Cleveland is pounding the Twins (11-0 in the 9th) and the White Sox are tied 1-1 with the Rangers in the bottom of the eighth.  Even the 1984 Tigers had their struggles in July.  Keep the faith.  These Tigers got bite, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7915</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7915</guid>
		<description>I thought bad call. I agree with Lou, it looked like Scutaro attempted to push Placido&#039;s hand off the bag, but i&#039;m not sure it accually came off. From my view on TV and my limited lip-reading availibility, the Ump was saying, &quot;YOU WERE OFF THE BAG.&quot; it looked like Placido and the Ump were arguing about if the hand was on the bag or not, so Placido thought that he kept his hand on the bag. Also, the Ump looked for a while, then pointed at something, and called him out. I&#039;m not sure what he pointed at. It was a really delayed call. He was definetaly innitially safe however. (PMS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought bad call. I agree with Lou, it looked like Scutaro attempted to push Placido&#8217;s hand off the bag, but i&#8217;m not sure it accually came off. From my view on TV and my limited lip-reading availibility, the Ump was saying, &#8220;YOU WERE OFF THE BAG.&#8221; it looked like Placido and the Ump were arguing about if the hand was on the bag or not, so Placido thought that he kept his hand on the bag. Also, the Ump looked for a while, then pointed at something, and called him out. I&#8217;m not sure what he pointed at. It was a really delayed call. He was definetaly innitially safe however. (PMS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7910</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7910</guid>
		<description>It appeared on the broadcast that Scutaro pushed Polly&#039;s right hand off the bag with his glove before Polly could reach the base with his left.  But, it&#039;s not conclusive.  Plus, I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s against the rules to push a player off the base like that, but I&#039;m not 100% sure of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appeared on the broadcast that Scutaro pushed Polly&#8217;s right hand off the bag with his glove before Polly could reach the base with his left.  But, it&#8217;s not conclusive.  Plus, I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;s against the rules to push a player off the base like that, but I&#8217;m not 100% sure of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle J</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7909</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7909</guid>
		<description>Anyone have the skinny on Polanco getting tagged out at second?  Good call?  I was at the game, so I didn&#039;t have a good view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have the skinny on Polanco getting tagged out at second?  Good call?  I was at the game, so I didn&#8217;t have a good view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Y.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7908</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7908</guid>
		<description>WHAT is wrong with Zach Miner???

A classic case of a sinkerballer with control problems.  He&#039;s been all over the place his last few starts.  Worse is he&#039;s been up -- sinkerballer kryptonite.

Let&#039;s hope he regains some command.  Otherwise, Maroth&#039;s absence suddenly becomes the problem we thought it would be....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT is wrong with Zach Miner???</p>
<p>A classic case of a sinkerballer with control problems.  He&#8217;s been all over the place his last few starts.  Worse is he&#8217;s been up &#8212; sinkerballer kryptonite.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope he regains some command.  Otherwise, Maroth&#8217;s absence suddenly becomes the problem we thought it would be&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7905</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7905</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;WHAT is wrong with Zach Miner???&lt;/blockquote&gt;
He&#039;s a rookie and there is plenty of tape on him by now. He&#039;ll adjust, but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see a couple more rough starts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WHAT is wrong with Zach Miner???</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s a rookie and there is plenty of tape on him by now. He&#8217;ll adjust, but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see a couple more rough starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7895</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7895</guid>
		<description>WHAT is wrong with Zach Miner??? His sinker looks good, it&#039;s just too darn high in the strike zone. I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT is wrong with Zach Miner??? His sinker looks good, it&#8217;s just too darn high in the strike zone. I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick G</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>Ooops. I&#039;m in Southern California. They&#039;re probably getting the game in Oakland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops. I&#8217;m in Southern California. They&#8217;re probably getting the game in Oakland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick G</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7887</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7887</guid>
		<description>Out in California, we&#039;re getting &quot;Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles&quot; on Fox. Our game of the week is the Bos-Sea game at 1 p.m. PT.

I like the kids, but wish they would read or something instead of watching cartoons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out in California, we&#8217;re getting &#8220;Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles&#8221; on Fox. Our game of the week is the Bos-Sea game at 1 p.m. PT.</p>
<p>I like the kids, but wish they would read or something instead of watching cartoons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian A.</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7886</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7886</guid>
		<description>why in the sam hill am i getting Mets/Astros instead of A&#039;s/Tigs today?  is that considered the &quot;national game&quot; and the others are on only in local regions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why in the sam hill am i getting Mets/Astros instead of A&#8217;s/Tigs today?  is that considered the &#8220;national game&#8221; and the others are on only in local regions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2006/07/game-97-as-at-tigers/#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>is the game on TV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the game on TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

