<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005 in Review &#8211; Runs Created</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/</link>
	<description>News, views, and analysis on the Detroit Tigers and baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJC in Detroit</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>SJC in Detroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>The chart is readable now -- thanks.  A little perspective, please -- what would some of these charts look like for other teams?  Not that I&#039;m asking you to do the analysis for all the playoff teams but, for instance, while RC dropped at catcher, is the 2005 level something close to average?  And how does the overall level compare to an offensive team like the Red Sox or offensively challenged team like the Astros?  Thanks for the hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart is readable now &#8212; thanks.  A little perspective, please &#8212; what would some of these charts look like for other teams?  Not that I&#8217;m asking you to do the analysis for all the playoff teams but, for instance, while RC dropped at catcher, is the 2005 level something close to average?  And how does the overall level compare to an offensive team like the Red Sox or offensively challenged team like the Astros?  Thanks for the hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>SJC - I&#039;ll try to get league averages for each position.  It will be helpful for judging the talent on the Tigers relative to the rest of the league.  The main point of this exercise was to illustrate the Tigers progress (or lack of) since last year.  Thanks for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJC &#8211; I&#8217;ll try to get league averages for each position.  It will be helpful for judging the talent on the Tigers relative to the rest of the league.  The main point of this exercise was to illustrate the Tigers progress (or lack of) since last year.  Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>With all the discussion in the Tram/Leyland posts, you might not notice this, but I&#039;ll give it a try anyways. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The common response offensive letdown is to point to the injuries. It&#039;s generally held that the 2004 Tigers may have overachieved slightly due to a below average number of key injuries, while the reverse is true for the 2005 Tigers. Is there a way to quantify and evaluate that?&lt;br&gt;but I would be really interested to see some stats regarding how</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the discussion in the Tram/Leyland posts, you might not notice this, but I&#8217;ll give it a try anyways. </p>
<p>The common response offensive letdown is to point to the injuries. It&#8217;s generally held that the 2004 Tigers may have overachieved slightly due to a below average number of key injuries, while the reverse is true for the 2005 Tigers. Is there a way to quantify and evaluate that?<br />
<br />but I would be really interested to see some stats regarding how</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Scratch the &quot;but I would really...&quot; line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scratch the &#8220;but I would really&#8230;&#8221; line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>On Ordo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Ordo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>I now notice that you covered all that Maggs stuff during the run-up to his signing during the hot-stove season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please excuse the rehash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now notice that you covered all that Maggs stuff during the run-up to his signing during the hot-stove season.</p>
<p>Please excuse the rehash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billfer</title>
		<link>http://www.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/2005-in-review-runs-createdphp/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Billfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.detroittigersweblog.com/2005/10/04/2005-in-review-runs-created.php/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Bob - no problem.  I understand the issues around Ordonez decreased production.  I was just looking more from a overall contribution aspect.  The Tigers were looking to increase their production from RF, but ended up neutral.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff - I think there is some truth in that.  It wasn&#039;t just a matter of benefitting from team health - but from some guys having career type years as well.  However, I dont&#039; know a way to quantify that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; no problem.  I understand the issues around Ordonez decreased production.  I was just looking more from a overall contribution aspect.  The Tigers were looking to increase their production from RF, but ended up neutral.</p>
<p>Jeff &#8211; I think there is some truth in that.  It wasn&#8217;t just a matter of benefitting from team health &#8211; but from some guys having career type years as well.  However, I dont&#8217; know a way to quantify that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

